I beg to differ about the sqwebmail list. I've gotten spam from it in the past. Also, this discussion has been done before. When inter7 setup the list, it wasn't done with that option. When inter7 has time I'm sure they'll recreate the list with the appropriate options, but I'm guessing it's not a small job (though I can't say for sure) If you want complete details, search the archives, but this horse has been beaten to death already.
Regards, Tren. > -----Original Message----- > From: Lou Hevly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 3:41 AM > To: vpopmail > Subject: Re: test spam; should be rejected > > > No cc: please; I'm on the list. > > At 11:02 02/12/01, Harry (lists) wrote: > >on 12/2/01 1:56 AM, Lou Hevly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Is there any reason for allowing spammers to post to this list? > > > >Not sure about the vpopmail list, but this exact same argument just > >finished > >on the qmail list, which is also an open list - and thus spam > >friendly. > > Really, are you sure? Now I'm on best-of-qmail, but I don't remember > ever getting spam when I was on the regular list. Lots of > Outlook-based > clueless virus replies, but these were from subscribers. > > >How much spam were you getting? I have not been noticing any > >significant > >spam on this list. > > *Am* I getting. 3,4,5 a day. Since installing TMDA it's the only spam > I > get, so it's conspicuous. Other ezmlm-run lists I'm on from which I > *never* receive spam are [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I assume all these lists have the -u option > enabled. > > > > -- > All the best (Adéu-siau), > Lou Hevly > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.visca.com > >
