Re: Outbound quota suggestion.

What?? - Original Message - From: "Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:58 PM Subject: Re: Outbound quota suggestion. > Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outbound quota suggestion.

Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > roaming users smtping, may be used to put a 'RELAYCLIENT' tag on the [...] Sorry! Correcting: [...] roaming users smtping, may be used to put a 'DATABYTES' tag on the [...] Now it's right. Best Regards, -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Outbound quota suggestion.

Hi all, Forgive me about my english (it's not quite so good!) My idea is: When a user sucessfully authenticates on vchkpw the same schema used to allow roaming users smtping, may be used to put a 'RELAYCLIENT' tag on the same line of the 'allow' tag on the tcp.smtp file. Example: ro.am.ming.i

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

on 9/4/01 6:27 PM, Vladimir Kabanov at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > Good day friends! > > of course thats not completing SMTP blocks, > its just a possibility to disable user from sending to someone else using our > protected smtp-server. > > I guess there also could be such possibility as block

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

> SMTP blocking (via vmoduser) is something I wouldn't mind seeing in 5.0.. I > just implemented smtp auth in production, and could use that sooner than > later. ; ) If I get time today, I'll try to extract those changes from > Vladimir's code and submit it as a patch to 5.0pre1. > > Che

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

on 9/4/01 12:09 PM, Bill Shupp at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > SMTP blocking (via vmoduser) is something I wouldn't mind seeing in 5.0.. I > just implemented smtp auth in production, and could use that sooner than > later. ; ) If I get time today, I'll try to extract those changes from > Vladim

Re: all fixed up vaddaliasdomain() patch (I hope...)

In the future, please post a URL to the patch file instead of posting the patch. Why? Because it eats up our T1 connection deliverying the patch file to everyone on the mailing list. Thanks ken On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:59, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hello

Advisories

I'd like to comment on the advisory posted below. First of all, this issue is as old as databases and programs that interface with them automatically. Changes to file and library permissions fixes any problems people might have with this as stated in my advisory about valias. The point in my ad

Re[7]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 8:05:19 PM, you wrote: > and parse the integer it returns. Maybe I should add a > char *get_real_domain(char * domain, char * realdomain, int > sizeofrealdomain) > function, so vget_assign() and everything else can easily get the >

Re[6]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ken, Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:58:05 PM, you wrote: >> Ken, is vget_assign() used anywhere to do something else than >> getting dir, uid, gid of the domain to work on? If it isn't it >> would be ok if it simply returns the values for the masterdomai

Re: Re[4]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:25, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hello Bill, > > Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:02:38 PM, you wrote: > > on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > spake: > >> IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdo

Re[4]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:15:21 PM, you wrote: > Will there at least be something like: > b.com is aliased to a.com > vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is aliased to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. Fixing this would most likely involve hacking around

Re[4]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bill, Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:02:38 PM, you wrote: > on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > spake: >> IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdomain >> anyway cause an aliasdomain is an aliasdomain and nothing mo

Re: Re[2]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

Will there at least be something like: b.com is aliased to a.com vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] is aliased to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Rich - Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gabriel Ambuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tues

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

on 9/4/01 12:08 PM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:31, Vladimir Kabanov wrote: >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new >>> vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. >>> >>> I do not want to add in any new fe

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:07, Einar Bordewich wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:42 PM > Subject: vpopmail-5.0pre1 > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:55, sec wrote: > Hello , > > It will be great if you will add spam blocking for certain users. > > I mean black-lists for certain users. > we are working on a new filtering project http://www.inter7.com/eps/ That should be the building block for filtering on a site/dom

Re: Re[2]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdomain anyway > cause an aliasdomain is an aliasdomain and nothing more, the user is > user@masterdomain and thus one should work only on the masterdomain. Sounds like I'm in

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:31, Vladimir Kabanov wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new > > vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. > > > > I do not want to add in any new features which require a new > > round of testing. Any new featur

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

Hello , It will be great if you will add spam blocking for certain users. I mean black-lists for certain users. -- Best regards, Yuri mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

> Hi Folks, > > The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new > vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. > > I do not want to add in any new features which require a new > round of testing. Any new features can be added to 5.1 (devel version) > and later released as a pr

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

- Original Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:42 PM Subject: vpopmail-5.0pre1 > Hi Folks, > > The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new > vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. > > I

vpopmail-5.0pre1

Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. I do not want to add in any new features which require a new round of testing. Any new features can be added to 5.1 (devel version) and later released as a production versi

Re[2]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bill, Monday, September 03, 2001, 9:35:39 PM, you wrote: > This now works properly, except for the fact that vget_assign > (which many of the vpopmail tools rely on) no longer know about > this domain. Vuserinfo and vmoduser, for example, can't find the

RE: sqwebmail3.0.0 and vpopmail4.9.10

Hi, thanks it is working fine now Luc -Original Message- From: Tren Blackburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 15:21 To: Schiltz Luc Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sqwebmail3.0.0 and vpopmail4.9.10 Get vpopmail 4.10

Re: sqwebmail3.0.0 and vpopmail4.9.10

Get vpopmail 4.10.32 Tren. On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Schiltz Luc wrote: > Hi, > > I installed the mentionned packages and get the following error when > compiling sqwebmail : > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/home/vpopmail/include -g -O2 -Wall -I > .. -I./.. -c authvchkpw.c > authvchkpw.c: I

sqwebmail3.0.0 and vpopmail4.9.10

Hi, I installed the mentionned packages and get the following error when compiling sqwebmail : gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/home/vpopmail/include -g -O2 -Wall -I .. -I./.. -c authvchkpw.c authvchkpw.c: In function `auth_vchkpw_changepass': authvchkpw.c:142: warning: assignment from inc

RE: No user found (4.9.10)

Ok, I feel like a fool now. While browsing through some archives, my eyes caught the tcpserver command which used -u and -g of vpopmail/vchkpw, and it sparked a thought. Low and behold, when I copied over my rc file from the old server to the new server, I forgot the change the uid/gid that tcpser

No user found (4.9.10)

Hello all, I'm currently in the process of upgrading to a new server, and I've reached a brick wall. For the past few hours, I've been playing with vpopmail authentication errors that I can't find a reason for. Between the old server (which is working with no problems) and the new server, th

Re: compile troubles

Bill, hello! > gcc -I. -Icdb -g -O2 -Wall -c vpopmail.c > In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:79, > from vpopmail.c:30: > /usr/include/bits/waitstatus.h:78: duplicate member `__w_retcode' > /usr/include/bits/waitstatus.h:79: duplicate member `__w_coredump' >