-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:02:38 PM, you wrote:
> on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spake:
>> IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdomain
>> anyway cause an aliasdomain is an aliasdomain and nothing more,
>> the user is user@masterdomain and thus one should work only on the
>> masterdomain.
> Sounds like I'm in the minority!
That's why I'm asking. I'm generally not against fixing it but I
don't
mind if I don't need to cause I'm a lazy (the sales people would call
it efficient :-) person...
>> I could, of course, patch vget_assign() to call get_domain_type()
>> first and in case of an aliasdomain simply return dir, uid, gid of
>> the masterdomain, thoughts?
> Nah, if people feel strongly that alias domains should not be
> treated as real accounts, then it's probably best to leave things
> as they are.
I mean I don't know what the others involved would like to say about
it, but I for myself would leave things the way as they are.
Ken, is vget_assign() used anywhere to do something else than getting
dir, uid, gid of the domain to work on? If it isn't it would be ok if
it simply returns the values for the masterdomain if invented on an
aliasdomain, right?
Best regards,
Gabriel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5i
iQEVAwUBO5UAZ8Za2WpymlDxAQHVywgAjlZYbMqTQoBrpZrKNw0WkvRm2/Kijd/b
TuaPfQKUKIUT9mdpLq32ZsdzABpevUuW8j8f+iSeeXUvOC0c6ETDy7UwhmtgSZlz
bom8z0tN8xEriIgxD3V6zD/M9sKJBpMC2bJTBMahm7Sv/iS1h5pMt+PVFCNTg0oD
qFD+hJFg5+SYGilFoBP+kCXE+ppgnhL4iSI+GXqA+vE2+HafsgcAO4kGpKZnwzx3
6yFPVnVPz2Y7qxOPE304+yyy2BCnBm4UJHJ7diWkkcCti7pRgB3dzn69j7tNvmsk
dmsuAXULz9ot471qXMEFJeldWxenNPo1am8oUNgLuYRXfX+ordDRzQ==
=mpOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
