> On Feb 20, 2024, at 20:03, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
>
>
> On 20/02/2024 17:40, Andrea Vesco wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG
>> chairs, and they explained that typically defining a new credential type
>> is not something th
Farrell
Cc: Andrea Vesco , "uta@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Uta] New I-D on VC and TLS
You are welcome to surface a conversation that has happened on a list such as
UTA with the TLS list.
Having the same conversation at the same time on multiple lists can be
challenging, and or spammy de
You are welcome to surface a conversation that has happened on a list such
as UTA with the TLS list.
Having the same conversation at the same time on multiple lists can be
challenging, and or spammy depending on how many IETF lists you have
subscribed to (I am subscribed to more than I should be).
On 20/02/2024 17:40, Andrea Vesco wrote:
Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG
chairs, and they explained that typically defining a new credential type
is not something that has been of interest to the TLS WG.
Interesting. Not sure I'd agree with that (not
Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG chairs,
and they explained that typically defining a new credential type is not
something that has been of interest to the TLS WG.
@UTA chairs - Could you please advise on the process to follow?
Regards,
AV
> On 20 Feb 2
Hiya,
I had a quick flick look at the draft. ISTM that's
one that'd need processing by the TLS WG and not
UTA. (Even if you disagree with that, you may agree
that it'll be better to give the TLS WG a heads-up
as someone there is bound to dislike this and it'll
be better to know that sooner rathe
>> On
Behalf Of Andrea Vesco
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 4:57 PM
> To: uta@ietf.org <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Uta] New I-D on VC and TLS
>
> L.Perugini and I have written an I-D on the use of Verifiable
Credential (VC) as a ne
next version.
>>
>> Andrea Vesco
>>
>> [0] https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
>>
>>
>> > On 19 Feb 2024, at 13:40, Yanlei(Ray) wrote:
>> >
>> > The motivation for your design needs to b
ay) wrote:
> >
> > The motivation for your design needs to be described in the draft.
> > Why do you want to put the public key in the distributed ledger?
> >
> > Lei YAN
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Uta On Behalf Of Andrea Vesco
>
On Behalf Of Andrea Vesco
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 4:57 PM
> To: uta@ietf.org
> Subject: [Uta] New I-D on VC and TLS
>
> L.Perugini and I have written an I-D on the use of Verifiable Credential (VC)
> as a new means of authentication in TLS. We think it might be
The motivation for your design needs to be described in the draft.
Why do you want to put the public key in the distributed ledger?
Lei YAN
-Original Message-
From: Uta On Behalf Of Andrea Vesco
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 4:57 PM
To: uta@ietf.org
Subject: [Uta] New I-D on VC and
L.Perugini and I have written an I-D on the use of Verifiable Credential (VC)
as a new means of authentication in TLS. We think it might be of interest and
in the scope of the UTA WG.
Could you please give us your opinion?
Draft
Datatracker https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vesco-vcauth
12 matches
Mail list logo
