> On Feb 20, 2024, at 20:03, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > > > On 20/02/2024 17:40, Andrea Vesco wrote: >> Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG >> chairs, and they explained that typically defining a new credential type >> is not something that has been of interest to the TLS WG.
I think that the part that maybe got missed was that all roads for TLS extensions pretty much start in TLS. > Interesting. Not sure I'd agree with that (not that > it matters) but guess we'll see. > > S. YMMV, but I’m remembering other times credential types have come on by TLS, e.g., OpenPGP (was in, then out) and IEEE 1609Dot2 (out). spt _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta