> On Feb 20, 2024, at 20:03, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> 
> On 20/02/2024 17:40, Andrea Vesco wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG
>> chairs, and they explained that typically defining a new credential type
>>  is not something that has been of interest to the TLS WG.

I think that the part that maybe got missed was that all roads for TLS 
extensions pretty much start in TLS.

> Interesting. Not sure I'd agree with that (not that
> it matters) but guess we'll see.
> 
> S.

YMMV, but I’m remembering other times credential types have come on by TLS, 
e.g., OpenPGP (was in, then out) and IEEE 1609Dot2 (out).

spt

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to