Hiya,
I had a quick flick look at the draft. ISTM that's one that'd need processing by the TLS WG and not UTA. (Even if you disagree with that, you may agree that it'll be better to give the TLS WG a heads-up as someone there is bound to dislike this and it'll be better to know that sooner rather than later:-) Cheers, S. PS: I'm not sure I like the idea of the kind of OCSP-like lookaside for checking credentials, from the privacy POV. On 19/02/2024 08:57, Andrea Vesco wrote:
L.Perugini and I have written an I-D on the use of Verifiable Credential (VC) as a new means of authentication in TLS. We think it might be of interest and in the scope of the UTA WG. Could you please give us your opinion? Draft Datatracker https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vesco-vcauthtls/ Github https://github.com/Cybersecurity-LINKS/draft-vesco-vcauthtls Kind Regards, Andrea Vesco _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
