Hi Stephen, before contacting UTA WG we have shared the I-D with TLS WG chairs, and they explained that typically defining a new credential type is not something that has been of interest to the TLS WG.
@UTA chairs - Could you please advise on the process to follow? Regards, AV > On 20 Feb 2024, at 17:41, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > Hiya, > > I had a quick flick look at the draft. ISTM that's > one that'd need processing by the TLS WG and not > UTA. (Even if you disagree with that, you may agree > that it'll be better to give the TLS WG a heads-up > as someone there is bound to dislike this and it'll > be better to know that sooner rather than later:-) > > Cheers, > S. > > PS: I'm not sure I like the idea of the kind of > OCSP-like lookaside for checking credentials, from > the privacy POV. > >> On 19/02/2024 08:57, Andrea Vesco wrote: >> L.Perugini and I have written an I-D on the use of Verifiable Credential >> (VC) as a new means of authentication in TLS. We think it might be of >> interest and in the scope of the UTA WG. >> Could you please give us your opinion? >> Draft >> Datatracker https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vesco-vcauthtls/ >> Github https://github.com/Cybersecurity-LINKS/draft-vesco-vcauthtls >> Kind Regards, >> Andrea Vesco >> _______________________________________________ >> Uta mailing list >> Uta@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > <OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc> _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
