Hi everyone,
Thank you for all your help. I followed EJ's advice on adding the 2nd FIFO
block, also Michael's for making the file sink unbuffered and now I am
receiving the whole file no matter the size. :)
Another issue that now came is the overflow warning:
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version
Hi,
I have a couple of X310 each of them has UBX+SBX cards. The devices are
synchronized by external 10MHz + PPS signal. But in my test I see random
phase delay between all channels that varies between test runs. The test
creates multi usrp device, sets up time and tunes to the same frequency
usin
On 06/18/2018 07:50 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of X310 each of them has UBX+SBX cards. The devices
are synchronized by external 10MHz + PPS signal. But in my test I see
random phase delay between all channels that varies between test runs.
The test crea
The frequency is around 600 MHz. I also tried higher frequencies. The
offset is visible on picture attached.
thanks,
Dmitry
пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 14:50, Дмитрий Михайличенко :
> Hi,
>
> I have a couple of X310 each of them has UBX+SBX cards. The devices are
> synchronized by external 10MHz + PPS
On 06/18/2018 10:28 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
The frequency is around 600 MHz. I also tried higher frequencies. The
offset is visible on picture attached.
thanks,
Dmitry
If you look here:
https://kb.ettus.com/UBX
You can see that for frequencies below 1GHz, you have to u
Is it important to have PPS signal aligned with reference 10 MHz signal. In
my case they come from different sources.
thanks,
Dmitry?
пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 17:37, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>:
> On 06/18/2018 10:28 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
>
On 06/18/2018 10:57 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
Is it important to have PPS signal aligned with reference 10 MHz
signal. In my case they come from different sources.
thanks,
Dmitry?
That shouldn't matter
пн, 18 июн. 2018 г. в 17:37, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
mailto
On 06/18/2018 10:57 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users wrote:
Is it important to have PPS signal aligned with reference 10 MHz
signal. In my case they come from different sources.
thanks,
Dmitry?
Something to be aware of though is that trying to achieve fine phase
synchronization (with pr
Dmitry,
The PPS and 10MHz should (at the very least) be generated using the same
base clock so they don't drift with respect to one another. Since you are
using multiple X310 devices, it is also important that the PPS arrives at
each device on the exact same cycle of the 10MHz clock--otherwise you
On 06/18/2018 12:07 PM, Daniel Jepson wrote:
Dmitry,
The PPS and 10MHz should (at the very least) be generated using the
same base clock so they don't drift with respect to one another. Since
you are using multiple X310 devices, it is also important that the PPS
arrives at each device on the
OK. Now I am trying to synchronize channels on UBX only boards. I am able
to get them synchronized if I use default master clock rate 200 MHz.
For my test I use modified UHD driver that allows to set 122.88 MHz master
clock. It seems that phase sync procedure does not work in that case.
thanks,
Dm
Marcus,
There is a potential ambiguity of one clock cycle (of the reference clock used
to sample the PPS) if the PPS is generated from a different clock root as the
phase of PPS w.r.t the REF_CLK slowly shifts.
This is due to the possibility of a setup/hold violation at one or both of the
sampl
Dmitry ,
Yes that will cause you some pain. In this specific case the internal details
of the X310 are important.
The PPS is first sampled by a synchronizer (chain of registers) clocked with
the REF_CLK. But then there is a secondary synchronizer to the DSP clock, which
in the case of your modi
Hi,
My platform is B210. I am trying to setup 1 x TX (1st USRP) and 2 x RX (2nd
USRP).
I am able to transfer a file using OFDM from one USRP to other with single
TX-RX antenna (2.421 GHz). But I am unable to configure the 2 x RX antenna.
Configured at Receiver USRP (Source):
Mb0: Subdev spec -
On 06/18/2018 07:13 PM, Ayaz Mahmud via USRP-users wrote:
Hi,
My platform is B210. I am trying to setup 1 x TX (1^st USRP) and 2 x
RX (2^nd USRP).
I am able to transfer a file using OFDM from one USRP to other with
single TX-RX antenna (2.421 GHz). But I am unable to configure the 2 x
RX a
Hi,
Thanks for suggestion.
I have taken the rx_ofdm.grc (as the receiver) & tx_ofdm.grc as transmitter in
the /OFDM/example/.
In this case, if I choose number of channel = 2 at RX USRP, then a new output
port is turned on, which must be connected to the next block (snap attached for
better un
On 06/18/2018 09:46 PM, Ayaz Mahmud wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for suggestion.
I have taken the rx_ofdm.grc (as the receiver) & tx_ofdm.grc as
transmitter in the /OFDM/example/.
In this case, if I choose number of channel = 2 at RX USRP, then a new
output port is turned on, which must be connected
17 matches
Mail list logo
