Re: [USRP-users] Phase after Freq Hopping

2019-03-12 Thread Ian Buckley via USRP-users
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 3:05 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users > wrote: > > On 03/12/2019 12:49 PM, Patscheider, Dominik via USRP-users wrote: >> Hello , >> >> For a Radar I´m transmitting and receiving with the USRP X310 samples on >> different frequency steps. >> >> For instance, after 4

Re: [USRP-users] Phase after Freq Hopping

2019-03-12 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 03/12/2019 12:49 PM, Patscheider, Dominik via USRP-users wrote: Hello , For a Radar I´m transmitting and receiving with the USRP X310 samples on different frequency steps. For instance, after 4 frames I´m coming back to the first center freq and continue this a few times. Hope the follow

Re: [USRP-users] N310 Initial Connection Issues

2019-03-12 Thread Robin Coxe via USRP-users
Hi Marc. Are you trying to connect using 1 gigE or 10gigE? The default N310 FPGA bitstream is the HG image, which expects 10gigE on SFP port 1 (192.168.20.2) and/or 1 gigE on SFP port 0 (192.168.10.2). -Robin On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Nate Temple via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.c

Re: [USRP-users] N310 Initial Connection Issues

2019-03-12 Thread Nate Temple via USRP-users
Hi Marc, What version of UHD are you using? If you're not running with any 3.14.0.0-rcX release, can you please try v3.14.0.0-rc3 ? Regards, Nate Temple On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:37 AM Marc Lichtman via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Hey, > > I'm having issues connecting to

[USRP-users] N310 Initial Connection Issues

2019-03-12 Thread Marc Lichtman via USRP-users
Hey, I'm having issues connecting to a N310 with stock firmware. Its eth0 port works fine; it can get an IP address and I can even SSH into it from a different (host) computer, but when I set up a second ethernet port on my host with a static IP of 192.168.10.1 and mask 255.255.255.0, and connect

[USRP-users] Phase after Freq Hopping

2019-03-12 Thread Patscheider, Dominik via USRP-users
Hello , For a Radar I´m transmitting and receiving with the USRP X310 samples on different frequency steps. For instance, after 4 frames I´m coming back to the first center freq and continue this a few times. Hope the following description helps… f3 |phase4| |…| f2

Re: [USRP-users] The problem with setting the frequency of USRP B 210.

2019-03-12 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 03/12/2019 10:26 AM, Ivan Zahartchuk wrote: Sorry, but I do not fully understand how to work with frequency offset. For example, I have an instantaneous bandwidth of 25 MHz. Then I set the frequency offset to 13 MHz? Because my amplitude decreases, but the peak still remains with a large amp

Re: [USRP-users] The problem with setting the frequency of USRP B 210.

2019-03-12 Thread Ivan Zahartchuk via USRP-users
Sorry, but I do not fully understand how to work with frequency offset. For example, I have an instantaneous bandwidth of 25 MHz. Then I set the frequency offset to 13 MHz? Because my amplitude decreases, but the peak still remains with a large amplitude. вт, 12 мар. 2019 г. в 15:13, Marcus D. Lee

Re: [USRP-users] x300 fw communication failure #1

2019-03-12 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 03/12/2019 05:02 AM, Armin Schmidt via USRP-users wrote: Hallo Guys, We use an x310 device with ubx-160 daughterboards and we have several custome RFNoC blocks on it. It works at the moment quite well but we get at the end of the make() for a multi-usrp the following error: [ERROR] [X300]

Re: [USRP-users] The problem with setting the frequency of USRP B 210.

2019-03-12 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 03/12/2019 05:13 AM, Ivan Zahartchuk via USRP-users wrote: Thanks for the information. But do not tell me why then in N 210 with sbx there is no such problem? Just in the N 210 I am not satisfied with the large central frequency. As I understand this is a surge in direct current. But I can't

Re: [USRP-users] link led colour

2019-03-12 Thread Joe Martin via USRP-users
No problem, Marcus. Thanks! Best regards, Joe > On Mar 12, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Marcus Müller wrote: > > Hi Koyel, Wade and Joe, > > ah! My bad. I got my X310 out of the cupboard and was so concentrated > on figuring which red LED was meant that I really focused on the back > panel – and forg

Re: [USRP-users] The problem with setting the frequency of USRP B 210.

2019-03-12 Thread Ivan Zahartchuk via USRP-users
Thanks for the information. But do not tell me why then in N 210 with sbx there is no such problem? Just in the N 210 I am not satisfied with the large central frequency. As I understand this is a surge in direct current. But I can't get rid of him. And sometimes there are problems with the mirror

[USRP-users] x300 fw communication failure #1

2019-03-12 Thread Armin Schmidt via USRP-users
Hallo Guys, We use an x310 device with ubx-160 daughterboards and we have several custome RFNoC blocks on it. It works at the moment quite well but we get at the end of the make() for a multi-usrp the following error: [ERROR] [X300] 192.168.10.1: x300 fw communication failure #1 EnvironmentError:

Re: [USRP-users] link led colour

2019-03-12 Thread Marcus Müller via USRP-users
Hi Koyel, Wade and Joe, ah! My bad. I got my X310 out of the cupboard and was so concentrated on figuring which red LED was meant that I really focused on the back panel – and forgot there's literally a "LINK" LED on the front of the USRP. My apologies! You'll have to do a bit of a deeper dive, b

Re: [USRP-users] [EXTERNAL] Re: Recording the full X3x0 bandwidth

2019-03-12 Thread Mark-Jan Bastian via USRP-users
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:40:49PM +, Minutolo, Lorenzo (389I) wrote: > Hi All, > > We're using the USRP x3x0 for cosmology and many other applications: we > use them to read out our cryogenics detectors. > > Do you need the full spectral bandwidth of the device? Things get much > easier if