X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=18.4 - Still delivered.

2011-05-10 Thread snowweb
I'm getting many spams in the last few days, with spam scores far above my 4.0 threshold, which are still being delivered. Wondering if it's to do with the fact that they all seem to have no sender. I've included the source of a recent one: ** SOURCE STARTS HERE Return-path

Re: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=18.4 - Still delivered.

2011-05-12 Thread snowweb
S databases are user trainable too, so we never get any issues. Users can control most aspects of the service, including disabling it. Thanks again. Peter Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 23:26 -0700, snowweb wrote: >> I'm getting many spams in the last few

Re: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=18.4 - Still delivered.

2011-05-18 Thread snowweb
Joseph Brennan wrote: > > The reason the SMTP standard requires this is ensure that a delivery > status > notice does not generate another delivery status notice. > Thanks Joseph. You're right, seems a bit daft. Nevermind, at least I know it's not broken now! Will continue to score as usual

Training SA

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
Hi, I'm new to SA. I run an Exim/Dovecot CentOS 5.0 mailserver (VPS), on which I have recently installed SA. I have configured 'Autolearn = yes' but I have no way to know whether this is working. Please can someone explain to me how this works, since my understanding of this is as follows, and ma

sa-update error

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message when I ran it manually: [r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update && service spamassassin restart Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/li

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
Sorry for my ignorance. I'm very new to Linux. Which missing perl module is that please? pete Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 03:30 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: >> I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of >> setting up a cron to do

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
When I do "which perl" it only returns, "/usr/bin/perl" doesn't this mean that I only have one installed? (I'm not arguing.. just trying to understand, since I'm new to Linux). pete Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > On Mon, June 8, 2009 12:55, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > >> It may also be worth run

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
erl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386 -linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/bin/sa-update l pete Nigel Frankcom-2 wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:30:59 -0700 (PDT), snowweb > wrote

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
I tested for two versions of perl using "which perl" and it only returned one location. I'm using CentOS 5.0 and I'm running DirectAdmin hosting software. The SA was installed by the script which installed the DirectAdmin. I don't understand how or where it got the SA from. Again, I don't know wh

Re: sa-update error

2009-06-08 Thread snowweb
feedback, I don't get any errors either, so I guess it's fixed. regards and many thanks pete snowweb wrote: > > I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of > setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error > message whe

I want to use RelayCountry

2009-07-18 Thread snowweb
I want to use RelayCountry but I have no idea where to find IP::Country::Fast Perl module, which it apparently depends on. Please can someone point me in the right direction. I've tried ixquick.com but nothing. Tnx. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-want-to-use-RelayCount

Re: I want to use RelayCountry

2009-07-19 Thread snowweb
RW-15 wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:20:49 -0700 (PDT) > snowweb wrote: > >> >> I want to use RelayCountry but I have no idea where to find >> IP::Country::Fast Perl module, which it apparently depends on. >> > > I would suggest you look throug

Re: I want to use RelayCountry

2009-07-22 Thread snowweb
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > That is bad answer. The proper answer was the one that advised using your > OS/distribution's packaging system first, and only use CPAN when the first > variant is not possible. > > Always use your OS/distributions packages and only install them manually > if >

Re: I want to use RelayCountry

2009-07-22 Thread snowweb
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote: > > CentOS is heavily dependent of RedHat, so it probably uses: > > - yum as its command line package manager: run it as root. > "man yum" tells all > - PackageKit as the Gnome (GUI) package manager. Its in the Gnome menu > as System|Administration|Add/Remove soft

Certain spam not parsed by spamd!

2009-07-23 Thread snowweb
I've recently implemented relaycountry and seen 90%+ improvement in our ability to trap spam but there is one email which seems capable of avoiding getting parsed by spamd. All other messages get the x-spam headers added successfully but this one for some reason completely slips through without a

Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd!

2009-07-24 Thread snowweb
LuKreme wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote: > > Is the email with attachment over 250KB? > No, it's just 74Kb -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Certain-spam-not-parsed-by-spamd%21-tp24638560p24640402.html Sent from the SpamAssa

Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd!

2009-07-24 Thread snowweb
Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > It apparently was never seen by SpamAssassin, if there were no X-Spam-* > -headers. > > How you call SpamAssassin? Any whitelisting there, do you call > SpamAssassin for your own mail? It seems the sender address is same as > receiver address. Whitelisted somehow, a

Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd!

2009-07-24 Thread snowweb
Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> >> The headers of the strange spam are: >> >> Return-path: >> Envelope-to: u...@host.co.uk >> Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:38 +0800 >> Received: from [190.144.0.42] (helo=CWXNQKBTZ) >>by s1.host.info with esmtp (Exim 4.67) >>(envelope-fro

Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd!

2009-07-24 Thread snowweb
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> LuKreme wrote: >> > On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb wrote: >> > >> > Is the email with attachment over 250KB? > > On 24.07.09 01:13, snowweb wrote: >> No, it's just 74Kb > > the email or the

How can I view bayes score for individual words?

2009-07-24 Thread snowweb
I tried to view the files bayes.toks, bayes.journal, bayes.seen and autowhitelist but they just look jibberish when opened in a unix editor. What's the solution to this? I was hoping to be able to tweak some of the scores and add certain words etc. -- View this message in context: http://www.nab

bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-25 Thread snowweb
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf bayes_auto_learn 1 But when I examine the message headers, X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.4 Is there anywhere else that I need to switch this on? -- Vi

Score -71 for VERY spammy message!

2009-07-25 Thread snowweb
This is the result, X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-71.4 required=4.7 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DU

Re: Score -71 for VERY spammy message!

2009-07-25 Thread snowweb
Terry Carmen wrote: > >> >> This is the result, >> >> X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-71.4 required=4.7 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR, >> >> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3, >> >> MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCV

Solved: Tnx. Re: Score -71 for VERY spammy message!

2009-07-25 Thread snowweb
Rob McEwen wrote: > > snowweb wrote: >> USER_IN_WHITELIST > > That probably has something to do with it. And make sure you haven't > whitelisted your own user because it is common for spammers to put the > recipient's address in there as the "from&q

Re: bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-25 Thread snowweb
Sorry, got mixed up. In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf use_bayes 1 Is there anywhere else that I need to switch this on since it does not appear to be doing bayesian testing at all for any messages. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/bayes-not-active-although-enabled--tp2

Re: bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-26 Thread snowweb
Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > On Sun, July 26, 2009 04:43, snowweb wrote: >> >> In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf >> >> bayes_auto_learn 1 >> >> But when I examine the message headers, >> >> X-Spam-Status: No, sco

Re: bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-26 Thread snowweb
Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:10, snowweb wrote: >> Sorry Benny, my message wasn't very clear (although your information was >> interesting). However, my main concern is that it is not using bayes to >> analyse the messages, let alone t

Re: bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-26 Thread snowweb
Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote: > >> 0.000 0258 0 non-token data: nspam >> 0.000 0160 0 non-token data: nham > > try to have them more or less equal to have good baye

Re: bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-26 Thread snowweb
Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > One can also use > > bayes_sql_override_username spam > > in local.cf, if the bayes is in a SQL database. I have that, and there > seems to be no difference if I use -u or not. > > I was wondering whether it was a user issue earlier, but I tried sa-learn

Re: bayes not active although enabled?

2009-07-26 Thread snowweb
snowweb wrote: > > > I was wondering whether it was a user issue earlier, but I tried sa-learn > --username=user --dump magic and it seemed to give the same result as the > default user. I tried various different users (even made some up!) but it > didn't complain -

Many rules not being used?

2009-07-28 Thread snowweb
The following is the spam headers of a message received: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on s1.snowweb.info X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=4.7 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RELAYCOUNTRY_FR autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Relay-Count

Re: Many rules not being used?

2009-07-28 Thread snowweb
Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > What makes you think anyone can answer that? The message you posted to > pastebin for us to test and review was nonexistent. > > What is 'pastebin' and how do I use it? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Many-rules-not-being-used--tp246961

Any one interested in using a proper forum?

2009-07-28 Thread snowweb
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA! Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I personally think that it should have

Re: Any one interested in using a proper forum?

2009-07-28 Thread snowweb
Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > What kind of a forum do you see? > > I use this as an email list, straight from my email application. I don't > use Nabble or Google Groups (whatever those might be..). > > Quite convenient. Just subscribe and enjoy. > > I'm trying to view these threads onlin

Re: Any one interested in using a proper forum?

2009-07-28 Thread snowweb
OK! Thanks guys for all your inputs, regardless off which side of the discussion you're leaning towards. I read and considered all your pro's and con's carefully. I'm not trying to pry anyone away from your list (and I'm sure I won't). I'm just trying to reach out to those who don't want to be a p

Re: Any one interested in using a proper forum?

2009-07-28 Thread snowweb
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 07:31 -0700, snowweb wrote: >> spamassassin-forum > > One way to get that included in web filter block lists. > > Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. > > Then I noted; > >Administrat