Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> It apparently was never seen by SpamAssassin, if there were no X-Spam-*
> -headers.
>
> How you call SpamAssassin? Any whitelisting there, do you call
> SpamAssassin for your own mail? It seems the sender address is same as
> receiver address. Whitelisted somehow, and maybe not inspected by
> SpamAssassin?
>
It's called by this part of my exim.conf
# Spam Assassin
spamcheck_director:
driver = accept
condition = "${if and { \
{!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \
{!eq {$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}} \
{!eq {$received_protocol}{local}} \
{exists{/home/${lookup{$domain}lsearch{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}/.spamassassin/user_prefs}}
\
{<{$message_size}{100k}} \
} {1}{0}}"
retry_use_local_part
transport = spamcheck
no_verify
I guess if their was whitelisting, that would have to be in the exim.conf
too, but i can't see any explicit whitelisting there.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Certain-spam-not-parsed-by-spamd%21-tp24638560p24640480.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.