Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 
> It apparently was never seen by SpamAssassin, if there were no X-Spam-*
> -headers.
> 
> How you call SpamAssassin? Any whitelisting there, do you call
> SpamAssassin for your own mail? It seems the sender address is same as
> receiver address. Whitelisted somehow, and maybe not inspected by
> SpamAssassin?
> 

It's called by this part of my exim.conf

# Spam Assassin
spamcheck_director:
  driver = accept
  condition = "${if and { \
                        {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \
                        {!eq {$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}} \
                        {!eq {$received_protocol}{local}} \
                
{exists{/home/${lookup{$domain}lsearch{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}/.spamassassin/user_prefs}}
\
                        {<{$message_size}{100k}} \
                } {1}{0}}"
  retry_use_local_part
  transport = spamcheck
  no_verify


I guess if their was whitelisting, that would have to be in the exim.conf
too, but i can't see any explicit whitelisting there.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Certain-spam-not-parsed-by-spamd%21-tp24638560p24640480.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to