LuKreme wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2009, at 22:45, snowweb <pe...@snowweb.co.uk> wrote: > > Is the email with attachment over 250KB? > No, it's just 74Kb -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Certain-spam-not-parsed-by-spamd%21-tp24638560p24640402.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Certain spam not parsed by spamd! snowweb
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! Jari Fredriksson
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! snowweb
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! snowweb
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! Jari Fredriksson
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! LuKreme
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! snowweb
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spamd! Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: Certain spam not parsed by spa... snowweb
- Re: Certain spam not parsed b... Matus UHLAR - fantomas