Re: Postfix Add Header Question

> I know some of you out there use Postfix and I have a quick question > that is a little off topic so I will apologize in advance and beg > forgiveness. > > I was just wondering how in Postfix that someone could add a header > indicating the IP address of the connecting host. I'm asking for someon

Customizing the .out file

I know there are options for the display fo the report but that is not what I am looking to do. I have a large volume (to me at least) of email to go through. I was hoping that someone knew of a way that when spamassassin (or the exchange event sink) can put at the top of the .out file the subjec

Customizing the .out file

I know there are options for the display fo the report but that is not what I am looking to do. I have a large volume (to me at least) of email to go through. I was hoping that someone knew of a way that when spamassassin (or the exchange event sink) can put at the top of the .out file the subjec

Windows with ESA - statistics?

I am using spamassasin on windows with the ESA message sync ( http://www.christopherlewis.com/ExchangeSpamAssassin.htm ) and would like to have some statistics so that I can better tune the spam assassin (particularly with the minimum spam setting and the purge on discovery setting). As perl is al

Re: Windows with ESA - statistics?

SA\reportparse.pl line 2. C:\ESA\Ham>reportparse.pl * DateStatus Score Can't open *: Invalid argument at C:\ESA\Ham\reportparse.pl line 2. On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 11:32:47 -0500, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Tim P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I

Re: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 using older version of ImageInfo

On 2 May 2007 at 15:32, Rose, Bobby wrote: > The ImageInfo packaged with 3.2.0 isn't the latest version from SARE as > it's missing the image_name_regex method. > > -=B > > I can not even get the 3.2 to run cleanly due to ImageInfo. When I leave the ImageInfo in the init.pre and in the plugin dir

FW: how to configure tcp.smtp

Simscan is compulsory to use in tcp.smtp ? as I want both attachment filtering and content filtering for mails From: Suhag P Desai [mailto:spde...@gnvfc.net] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:46 PM To: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org' Subject: how to configure tcp.smtp I

RE: Updating spam signatures file

I gone through http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates Below is my version.. SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5 running on Perl 5.8.8 with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.31) with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.024) I have two directories.. under /var/lib/spamassassin 3.002005 3.003

Sought False Positives

Hi, we use spamassassin with the sought ruleset since several years at our company. After the upgrade to from 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 we notice tons of false-positives hitting on the rules JM_SOUGHT_1 and JM_SOUGHT_2. Unfortunaley I can not give examples as these messages contain confidental customer data

Re: Samples?

Am 25.8.2010 22:47, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > Jan, any chance you could provide the paragraphs or text parts > corresponding to the seeks? > > Just to clarify: We do *not* require the full message, even though it > makes things simpler. In fact, no headers (other than Subject) are ever > u

Re: dns*.registrar-servers.com as a rogue registrar?

> For this particular case it would be better to write a DNS plugin that > would do a DNS lookup for the domain nameservers and return that in a > matchable form. Going via the registrar to get the nameservers incurs > far too much overhead. Two examples with postfwd: # hard version id=REJECT_BA

Re: Spammer using my domain name in FROM field

Spammer apparently is using [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the FROm field of the emails he is sending out. Domain is one of my customers virtual domain, spammer made up the username in the email address. Now I am getting burried by mail notifications returning to sender...obviously wrong person. How do

Re: Spammer using my domain name in FROM field

Hello Predrag, Saturday, September 11, 2004, 9:47:42 AM, you wrote: PL> Spammer apparently is using [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the FROm PL> field of the emails he is sending out. Domain is one of my customers PL> virtual domain, spammer made up the username in the email address. PL> Now I am getting

RE: [ot] NASCAR fans gonna be mad at me :)

NAHHH!!! He just a reporter, though one of the more important ones!!! Now if you had broken the leg of one of the top ten drivers Rhode Island would be way too small to hide in.. FYI: Not all NASCAR fans are from the SOUTH!!! Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services

RE: locating/translating geography of IP addresses

Solaris. There are others on the market both Shareware and purchased. Just do a net Search on Graphical TraceRoute Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Celtic Spirit Networking Providing Web Hosting Services, Network and Systems installation for the home or office. Phone: 919-618-2557 Web

Re: sa-learn sql with username ?

Jason Frisvold wrote: You mean this? http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3766 Awesome, thanks for the link :) It's always interesting to watch the flow of thinking for something like this... I can agree with both sides of the permissions issue... In my case, the only users with dir

Re: SA or Maildrop

Currently I use a maildrop script that checks the score given to the email by SA and if it reaches a certain number or greater it gets sent to a different mailbox. My question is could you do that instead in SA local.cf and if so which one would be better in doing this? Should I keep the maildrop s

RE: spamassassin and web based mails !

gards, Peter P. Benac, CCNA Celtic Spirit Network Solutions Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web Hosting. Phone: 919-618-2557 Web: http://www.emacolet.com Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit http://www.nmsusers.org To have princ

RE: spamassassin and web based mail !

ing out of your business and attempt to filter out what might be a spam source. All I can say is Good Luck with that. Programs like SurfControl and WebSense filter on source and destination IP addresses and hostnames. You need something that goes deeper into a TCP/UDP packet. Regards, Pete --

RE: spamassassin and web based mail !

es, and wannabe hackers using your cybercafé to upload their dirty work, and a good virus scanner can fix that. Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Celtic Spirit Network Solutions Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web Hosting. Phone: 919-618-2557 Web: http://w

RE: Unsubscribe?

a better way of spending the money like maybe on Education, Law Enforcement, EMS Services, or Fire Services... Just a thought!! Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Celtic Spirit Network Solutions Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web Hosting. Phone: 919-618

RE: Unsubscribe?

And that makes it right because? Peter P. Benac, CCNA Celtic Spirit Network Solutions Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web Hosting. Phone: 919-618-2557 Web: http://www.emacolet.com Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit http

Re: SquirrelSAP 1.0.3 for Squirrel Mail is Ready!

SquirrelMail, for those that don't know, is an alternative web interface capable of accessing most of the most popular mail servers. I've just completed a major rewrite of the SourceForge project for the Spamassassin PHP-SA_MySQL plugin which I now maintain. This plugin allows your clients whi

[Fwd: Re: SquirrelSAP 1.0.3 for Squirrel Mail is Ready!]

tem to turn those off, since I am using a plugin that does the same thing a little more comprehensively (completely configurable, not necessarily tied to SA). That plugin is attached and might be released soon. Randy? - Paul On Mar 8, 2005, at 2:22 PM, p dont think wrote: Can you please expla

Multiple local configurations

Is it possible to use the spamc/spamd pair by invoking spamc with a per instance refernence to a list of customized local.cf files? I would like to have different rules on a per destination domain basis. Is this possible? -- Quist ConsultingEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 219 Donlea Dri

Test for no Subject line field

Is there a test that one can construct that would assign a weight to a message that is missing a certain header, completely? In my case, no Subject line at all. -- Quist ConsultingEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 219 Donlea DriveVoice: +1.416.696.7600 Toronto ON M4G 2N1

Adding addresses to blacklist manually

examined". I can not figure out where or what blacklist this command is adding the address; I would like to be able to check on the results in order to make sure it is working. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Greg -- Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Adding addresses to blacklist manually

from the template located in > /usr/share/spamassassin. > Hope this helps. > > Thanks, > > Antonio DeLaCruz > > > Quoting "Gregory P. Ennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Everyone, > > > > I installed 3.03 this afternoon and everything

Re: Folder redirection

t; Don't see how I do that. Help appreciated. > > Mark -- Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Adding addresses to blacklist manually

On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 16:01 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > >Everyone, > > > >I installed 3.03 this afternoon and everything looks good. > > > >I finally decided to set up a user alias e-mail address to take > >advantage of

MySpace

Greetings, More and more of my clients are using MySpace. The spam filters put them in the 4-5 point range. Your opinions are needed. Is it worth white listing MySpace? Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services, Inc Web and Mail Hosting. Phone: 252-657-9591

Re: Enable Spamcop only

Mofo_Jones schrieb: Just Postfix. In postfix and I believe Sendmail. John D. Hardin wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mofo_Jones wrote: One more question. This site has multiple domains that it does a MX backup for and there are a few domains that I do not want SA to scan and add any heade

Re: Anyone seeing this FP?

t would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege > ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy? > > Chris Santerre > SysAdmin and SARE/URIBL ninja > http://www.uribl.com > http://www.rulesemporium.com > > > Peter P. Benac,

3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

Everyone, I upgraded from 3.0.3 to 3.1.0 and have had a bunch of problems. I finally got a good install, but could not do it via cpan. There were many modules that I had to manually install. I have had it active for about a week and every night for some reason it stops filtering. When this hap

Re: 3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 12:27 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Here are the results of spamassassin --lint: > > > > [18110] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Can't locate > > Ma

Re: 3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:08 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > Is it in a "normal" location that perl will look for it? (the list of @INC > dirs from the error message) > I have a Red Hat 8.0 system with the plugins stored in : /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin which is th

Re: 3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 18:15 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis schrieb: > > Everyone, > > > > I upgraded from 3.0.3 to 3.1.0 and have had a bunch of problems. I > > finally got a good install, but could not do it via cpan. There were > > ma

Re: 3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:28 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 12:19:46PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > I have a Red Hat 8.0 system with the plugins stored in : > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin > > which is the normal d

Re: 3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 09:41 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 18:15 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote: > > Gregory P. Ennis schrieb: > > > Everyone, > > > > > > I upgraded from 3.0.3 to 3.1.0 and have had a bunch of problems. I > &g

Re: 3.1.0 upgrade/installation difficulties

On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 13:00 -0500, Chris wrote: > On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:44 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 01:20:10PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > [21132] warn: _(Can't locate object method "header" via package > > &g

Upgrade to 3.1.0 and spamd

Everyone, I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.1.0 on two Red Hat 8.0 machines; everything seems to be working on the faster mail server, but I am having problems with the slower server. On the slower machine spamd seemed to quit working allowing the mail to go through the system without being filtered.

Re: primary nameservers

o back to one set of > nameservers, and it would probably be pretty close to a 100% hit rate if I > could check that. > > --Russell > > -- > > Russell Miller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Agoura Hills, CA > Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services, Inc Providin

Re: dnsbl checks time out

Elsa Andrés schrieb: > OTOH, that server cannot be dead as I can perform any "host" or "dig" > queries with it: > Just a guess: Is /etc/resolv.conf readable by the uid you run sa/amavis?

RE: mcafee sees drop in spam?

-Original Message- From: Randy [mailto:rramsd...@livedatagroup.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:13 To: SpamAssassin Users List Subject: Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Michael Scheidell wrote: > looks like mcafee sees a 20% drop in spam? > > wonder what that is about. I'm not seeing a dr

RE: Whitelist_From Woes

/var/log/maillog output: May 13 10:53:46 cerberus MailScanner[3309]: Message n4DFrTip004779 from 63.93.193.30 (a...@easymatch.com) to saintjoe.edu is spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=68.739, required 4, AWL -33.17, BAYES_50 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, HTML_30_40 0

RE: Email from myself to myself

-Original Message- From: hateSpam [mailto:khwaja_a...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 09:48 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Email from myself to myself What is white_list and how can I check it. sorry about all these question I am new in Linux specially on server

RE: Email from myself to myself

-Original Message- From: hateSpam [mailto:khwaja_a...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:11 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Email from myself to myself I got it thanks. Yes i am not whitelisted but in spamassassin I put the domain of all spams to be marked as sp

Re: How many people are still using perl 5.6.x?

Justin Mason schrieb: > For the upcoming release, we're considering dropping support for that > interpreter version. If you're still using 5.6.x, or know of a > (relatively recent) distro that does, please reply to highlight > this > > --j. > Don't know if it's still relevant: Solaris 8 #

Re: How many people are still using perl 5.6.x?

Jan P. Kessler schrieb: > Justin Mason schrieb: > >> For the upcoming release, we're considering dropping support for that >> interpreter version. If you're still using 5.6.x, or know of a >> (relatively recent) distro that does, please reply

Re: How many people are still using perl 5.6.x?

Henrik K schrieb: >> sorry, just missed the "relatively recent" statement ;-) >> > > When the system gets old enough that it's not supported officially and you > are forced to manually CPAN fresh modules (and possibly wreak havoc on the > OS), there is no reason not to compile your own perl (o

Re: [NEW SPAM FLOOD] www.shopXX.net

Jason Haar schrieb: > All this talk about trying to catch urls that contain spaces/etc got me > thinking: why isn't this a standard SA feature? i.e if SA sees > "www(whitespace|comma|period)-combo(therest)", then rewrite it as the > url and process. How would you distinguish between ... go to

Re: [NEW SPAM FLOOD] www.shopXX.net

Martin Gregorie schrieb: >> ... go to WWW EVIL ORG for new meds ... >> >> and >> >> ... digging through the WWW HE SAW this link ... >> > Both IMO should be caught and given a positive score. I've never seen > legitimate mail containing URLs written this way. Maybe I was not clear: The last one is

Re: [NEW SPAM FLOOD] www.shopXX.net

Michelle Konzack wrote: > Is SAW a valid TOPLEVEL domain? > > SA could use a list of valid TLD's. > Ok, let's change that (do not forget that there's more than .com) the www seems to become the primary source of information these days (->www.seems.to?) And I think we agree, that it wo

Re: [NEW SPAM FLOOD] www.shopXX.net

Martin Gregorie schrieb: > What makes you think I'm using URI tests or that any of these would be > recognised as a URI? My tests are simple body tests with {1,n} limits on > repetitions to keep things under control. > So you want obfuscated urls to be recognised as urls but not treated as urls

RE: OT bad news

Glad I don't live in Virginia!! I hate to see my tax dollars wasted because people don't understand OpenSource.. Especially in these troubled times. From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 15:42 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: OT bad ne

Re: How to tell if sa-update is actually running

On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, mouss wrote: you can query DNS to get the "version" of the rules. for example: $ host -t txt "*.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org" *.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "895075" (2.3 is the "reverse" of 3.2, which corresponds to the SA version you use). Looks like 3.

SA 3.3.0 spamassassin taint issue

I have not gotten this into the bugzilla, but ... as it appeas a 3.3 release is imminent, I though I should mention seeing this in my log files: I am getting this: Jan 20 18:17:40 vm049244181 spamd[14023]: spamd: Insecure dependency in chown while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/v

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kaleb Hosie wrote: I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now. I ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr::IP module. I've installed it but when I try to install the built RPM file it gives me this error: error: Failed dependencies:

correction: was: WARNING CENTOS USERS! BEWARE AUTO YUM INSTALL OF 3.3.1!

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Charles Gregory wrote: Had a nice HEART-STOPPING moment this morning! Logged in and found my mailbox had no new mail! WTF!?? Checked the logs and discovered that my nightly automatic updates via YUM had pulled in the new SA 3.3.1-3. WARNING: Centos does NOT run t

SA scan internal to external / internal to internal

Hi Mailing List users, This is my first message in this mail community and I am evaluating SA very first time. I have few question in my mind regarding working of SA. I gone through a FAQ and some documentation from official SA websites. 1. Is SA for external to internal mail only

RE: SA scan internal to external / internal to internal

Anyone has any comment ? -Original Message- From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 8:16 PM To: Suhag P Desai Subject: Re: SA scan internal to external / internal to internal courier-authlib is the authentication database that stores userids and

spamassassin or simscan ???

Hi all, I can scan all the attachment as per rule define in simcontrol and tcp.smtp. But I am not able to detect the spam mail as define in rule set of /etc/mail/spamassassin/ ..please help My simcontrol file looks like below [r...@spd tcprules.d]# cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol hi.com

RE: spamassassin or simscan ???

;/var/qmail/control /domainkeys/%/private" But still spam detection is not done.. I am trying to scan internal mail i.e from same domain to domain Please help Thanks.. -Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:ri...@ummm-beer.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:43 P

RE: spamassassin or simscan ???

LIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 2>&1 -Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:ri...@ummm-beer.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:03 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamassassin or simscan ??? On 27/07/2010 1:21 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote: > Thanks Rick

RE: spamassassin or simscan ???

(Of course both incoming and outgoing). Thanks, Suhag. -Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:ri...@ummm-beer.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:24 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamassassin or simscan ??? On 27/07/2010 1:41 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote

server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address already in use

I have installed qmail toaster plus latest version. When I run the spamd it appears with below output. [r...@spd ~]# spamd [25502] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address already in use [25502] warn: server socket setup fail

RE: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address already in use

, 2010 12:08 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address already in use Suhag P Desai wrote: > > spamd: could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address already in > use > S

how to configure tcp.smtp

I am running qmailtoaster-plus on my centos box with below spamd version. [r...@spd ~]# spamd --version SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5 running on Perl 5.8.8 with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.31) with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.024) can anyone let me know how to configure

Yum Failure with mirrors unavailable

Everyone, I have an FC8 unit that for some reason has stopped allowing yum updates. unname -a results in : Linux .Domain.com 2.6.25.10-47.fc8 #1 SMP Mon Jul 7 18:31:41 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux When I tried to do so manually with the command : yum update I receive the foll

Re: Yum Failure with mirrors unavailable

Sorry... I posted this to the wrong list !!! On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 13:37 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > I have an FC8 unit that for some reason has stopped allowing yum > updates. > > unname -a results in : > > Linux .Domain.com 2.6.25.10-47.fc8 #

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

mouss schrieb: Micah Anderson a écrit : "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote: postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be white

sought rules update fails

Hi, sa-update currently fails with: http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: HTML 2.0//EN"> 403 Forbidden Forbidden You don't have permission to access /rules/stage/320725913.tar.gz on this server. Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.6 PHP/5.2.4-2ubuntu5.3 with Suhosin-Patch mod_ssl/2.2.8 Ope

FIXED: sought rules update fails

Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb: On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote: sa-update currently fails with: http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: [...] Any permission issues on yerp.org? Just tested, works for me. Did you try again? Jep, it's workin

Re: Novice Installation Help

dave_c00 schrieb: > I have run the 'perl Makefile.PL' in the correct directory but the 'make > install' isn't working. > Something is going wrong! So, you think my comment is not very helpful? Maybe your desciption of the problem is not that helpful, too. If you don't provide more information

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: > > > Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already > > (3.2.5 used here)? > > > My stats report those: > > URIBL_JP_SURBL > > URIBL_AB_SURBL > > URIBL_

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

> > > There are a very few queries to the individual lists. I suppose > > > it could be some very old installations of version 2.6. They > > > should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent. > > On 08.02.09 11:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Sorry t

Spam assasin query

v-0001BG-82 > > " I shall be highly obliged if you could let me know how the same can be enabled again. Thanx & Rgds., Ramdas P. Prabhu

Re: SA ignores mail from outside of the domain

On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Bures wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:11:42 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote: > > >Probably you haven't set trusted_networks and/or internal_networks > >correctly, and you are getting ALL_TRUSTED firing on the in

Re: SA ignores mail from outside of the domain

On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:31 -0500, Frank Bures wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:40:27 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > >On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Bures wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: SA ignores mail from outside of the domain

On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 13:36 -0500, Frank Bures wrote: > > My configuration: > > Quad Opteron 2GHz with 8GB RAM. > RHEL 4 > spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4 > procmail-3.22-14 > > My version of spamd does not recognize option --round-robin > Frank, Looks like I was not much help. I have not had any

Re: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

om their lists. All the lists I host have already done that. In the mean time you could try using AOL's whitelist program, but it is a joke. Regards, Pete Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services, Inc Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and We

Re: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

applied for AOL's > whitelist program. For my own edification, why is the whitelist program a > joke? > > Dimitri Peter P. Benac, CCNA Emacolet Networking Services, Inc Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web Hosting. Phone: 919-618-2557 W

RE: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

AOL members addresses then I'd like to know what you did to receive them, because you appear the only one is several list I belong to that are discussing this very issue that is seeing those addresses. > Peter P. Benac wrote: >> AOl will send you what they refer to as a TOS alert w

RE: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

I tried that Matthew. It too was changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What I haven't tried is removing the @aol.com. > Peter P. Benac wrote: >> Very true.. I went around and around with AOL over this every issue >> for three days. > > After inspecting some TOS reports...

Re: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

> In a mailing list manager app I wrote, I simply put a MD5 hash of the > address in the headers. Then I have something to check against the > subscriber list that AOL would never remove from the headers. Now if only > I > could make Mailman do the same thing... > > P

RE: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

s link to verify your > registration." > > If AOL complains about that reply, you pull up your logs and ask them "how > could it be spam when THEY emailed ME first??" > > -- > Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 > Hispa

RE: (OT, but relevant) Playing with AOL?

Don't tempt me, though that would pay for the goodmail payments. > Peter P. Benac wrote: >> Confirmation elimates bad addresses. The major problem comes >> from people too lazy to unsubscribe from a list. They just hit the >> spam >> button. AOL refuses to a

RE: /etc/shadow access from SA

d(0); > print "name=$name uid=$uid\n"; > > # perl test.pl > name=root uid=0 > > # strace perl test.pl 2>&1 | grep passwd > open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY) = 3 > open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY) = 3 > > # strace perl test.pl

Re: OR NOT Logic

> > A && (B || C || D || E || F) > > equivalent to?: > > A && (!B && !C && !D && !E && !F) > > as in: > > meta __FORGED_OUTLOOK_DOLLARS (__OUTLOOK_DOLLARS_MUA && ! > __OUTLOOK_DOLLARS_MSGID && !__OUT

End-user (not administrator) question

Hi all, the system administrator in our university recently started using spamassassin in our mail server. Unfortunately, I can't say this has been a good thing for me and for many other users, and I'll try to explain why. First, for each mail that the tool assumes to be a spam, I receive an ema

[FOLLOW-UP] End-user (not administrator) question

de 2006 16:32 Para: Ricardo P. Jasinski Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Assunto: Re: End-user (not administrator) question Most certainly. Ask to be put on the "Spam Lovers" list. Spamassassin is (IMHO) the best tool for dealing with SPAM. And the ability to give any user the freed

Re: SpamAssassin and Horde

regarding the problem where mail from horde gets hit with HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP rule due to sender's IP address. see below... do you mean SA 3.1? On Apr 14, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Justin Mason wrote: check the bugzilla -- I'm pretty sure this is fixed for 3.1.0. - --j. This is the IP from th

Inappropriate use of E-Mail addresses

Everyone, I have used spamassassin on our mail servers now for over 4 years and have nothing but high praise for what it has done for us. However, recently we have been hit by bounced e-mail that is related to the inappropriate use of some of our e-mail addresses. It appears that some spam art

Re: Inappropriate use of E-Mail addresses

n that I have pledged to NEVER EVER find in favor of > a spammer if I find myself on a jury with him as the plaintiff or defendant. > > Besides, I'd probably jump over the jury box railing and gouge his eyes out > before the trial was over. > > {^_^}Joanne > - Or

RE: Inappropriate use of E-Mail addresses

On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 09:53 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:50 AM > > To: jdow > > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject: Re: I

Re: R: Inappropriate use of E-Mail addresses

On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 16:19 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > -Messaggio originale- > > Da: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > > -Messaggio originale-

Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.

fact that we charge a relatively small monthly sum to the senders makes firing them pretty painless. Thus it has always been - best practices over money *always* - we can take this stand because we are, always have been, and always will be, privately held, and the buck stops with me). Anne -- Ann

Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email.

month that Scott Weiss started Bonded Sender). All we ask is that if you are going to do a ton of querying, that you transfer the zone to a local copy instead of querying directly. Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney Legislative Advisor Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPA

Re: netflix phishing emails forwarded via sendgrid

Does anyone have a copy of the netflix phishing that they could forward to me at amitch...@isipp.com, including the body of it? TIA! Anne > On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:04 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more? > > t

Re: OT - Hotmail/Outlook.com marking most of our email as Junk

ubject line of the test email. Anne --- Outsource your email deliverability headaches to us, and get to the inbox, guaranteed! www.GetToTheInbox.com Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. CEO Get to the Inbox by SuretyMail Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law) Au

  1   2   >