On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:38 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: > > > > > > > Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already > > > > (3.2.5 used here)? > > > > > > > My stats report those: > > > > URIBL_JP_SURBL > > > > URIBL_AB_SURBL > > > > URIBL_SC_SURBL > > > > URIBL_OB_SURBL > > > > URIBL_WS_SURBL > > > > > > > No report of multi in there but lots of individuals... > > > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote: > > > No changes are needed. Any versions of SpamAssassin within the > > > past 3 years use multi by default. Any SpamAssassin version 3 or > > > later should be ok. > > > > > > There are a very few queries to the individual lists. I suppose > > > it could be some very old installations of version 2.6. They > > > should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent. > > On 08.02.09 11:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Sorry to ask a basic question but is this feature activated with: > > > > # URIDNSBL - look up URLs found in the message against several DNS > > # blocklists. > > # > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL > > this urns on the whole functionality of using URI blacklists. > The original problem is only about SURBL.
Thanks for the response. How can I determine if SURBL is turned on?
