n]$
>
>
hm looks like some stuff isnt fixed final
Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm line 1415
i ve read some bug reports , any recent news to this ?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys
.net/p/courier/mailman/message/4591641/
spamassassin ( never used it like this )
http://jrs-s.net/2013/06/14/block-common-trojans-in-spamassassin/
best is that clam will detect the problem
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerst
Hi ,does anyone know something about this ?
Use of uninitialized value in lc at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm line 418
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft
Am 26.02.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Benning, Markus:
> On 2016-02-26 08:59, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi ,does anyone know something about this ?
>>
>> Use of uninitialized value in lc at
>> /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm line 418
>
> Thats
me extension.
>
> So the content type header may be "application/octet-stream" and totally
> missing a 'name=' component but if there's also a Content-Disposition
> header that has a 'filename=' component it will trigger file opening
> behaivor.
>
>
out everything but still nothing.
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> Regards.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
Am 17.04.2016 um 14:23 schrieb RW:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:42:59 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 17.04.2016 um 09:04 schrieb Benjamin Yeo:
>>> Hi Guys. I've just downloaded the latest SpamAssassin and I want to
>>> integrate with my mail server Ja
r. Feel free to file issues or
> pull requests there. If/when a spamass-milter project member takes an
> interest, changes can be merged back into the official CVS repository.
>
> Andy
>
I think you dont have to worry, recent ,the work on spamass-milter is
simply done
Best
spamassassin have
high "costs", so make sure to reject as most as possible by other stuff
before pass to spamassassin.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amts
hese days greylisting has lost his
effectiveness widly, so depending on your server it makes no sense
to use it anymore
content filter like spamassassin are "expensive"
always "try" to get them at a very last stage in you filter chain
best practise configs can be found via google, the rest is looking
at your logs and fix stuff in your filter chain when needed
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
it over years, if you use postscreen you will see
greylisting rate will go down to a minimal need, however
if done right you can still always combine both
can we now return to spamassassin here
and get that theme to the postfix list ?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sy
Am 29.07.2016 um 20:45 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:36:51 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 29.07.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
>>> I don't agree. Greylisting done properly is very effective and has
>>> minimal impact.
Am 29.07.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:13:56 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> so i.e measure mails tagged as spam by spamassassin
>> with pure greylisting setup running before tagging ,perhaps for one
>> week, then stop greylis
informative
>
>
>> On Jul 29, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Robert Schetterer > <mailto:r...@sys4.de>> wrote:
>>
>> the subject Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold
>> does not match spamassassin list theme
>>
>> however no need to flame in any ca
Am 29.07.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:21:04 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> now compare with pure postscreen
>
> I don't use postfix or postscreen.
hm.. that does not fit the subject..why did you involved yourself ?
All I
Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15 +0200
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>>> I don't use postfix or postscreen.
>>> hm.. that does not fit the subj
Am 30.07.2016 um 13:10 schrieb Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15
nection is handed over from postcreen to the smtpd
> process after a client has passed the tests
>
you may use a complete postfix server including postscreen etc "before"
sendmailbut then it might better to simply change to postfix in
total, but such setups are often use with M
Am 04.08.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Chris:
> Greylisting is just one of several tools available to a system
> administrator for filtering out spam
as multiple described it does not
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße
ub/5219815/+listing-archive-extra
>
> H ... do you think better backporting 3.4.1 from Xenial? Does it run
> on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and 14.04 LTS?
>
> Ciao!
>
>
tested and running with recompile debian way 3.4.1 from wily 15.04 does
run in 14.04
Best Regards
MfG Robert
Am 16.09.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Am Freitag, den 16.09.2016, 13:02 +0200 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.09.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2016, 22:02 -0400 schrieb
do expensive content filter to known not
wanted domains.
At the end ,at a server with many different users you will see that some
marketing is really wanted by some users, but others like to see it
so best way for this are users own white/blacklists after you filtered
the most bad things global.
Be
Am 30.09.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 30.09.2016 um 02:28 schrieb Alex:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone given any thought to special rules or methods designed to
>> catch greymail? That is, mail that perhaps may be opt-in, but abusive,
>> like marke
d-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/
but this solutions may not fit exact to "your" problem
fail2ban is a good well tested solution
so you should always decide by deep log analysis which way to go
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
traffic ,action should be taken etc ,such
exists but not as freeware and for sure it must be fitted to your needs
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
no server.
>>
>> The concept being that some spammers attempt that server, get nothing
>> and don't bother trying any other server.
>>
>> This has been fine for a decade.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 3
ls in
> Portuguese Language?
>
> Cheers,
>
> - heinrich
>
> key: 0xC15DAD56 -- 363D 5BC3 9C45 9D09 3D78 1C28 DB68 F047 C15D AD56
>
http://www.lafraia.com.br/spambr/
no idea if they are working fine
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30
Am 20.04.2017 um 15:57 schrieb RW:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:37:42 +0200
> Heinrich Boeder wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I tried the Ruleset Robert Schetterer suggested but I still get Sp
>
> On 07.05.17 12:46, Thore Boedecker wrote:
>> I have played around with it and SA is not performing actual SPF
>> queries/validations due to the use of spampd on localhost as a proxy.
>
> that's why I recommended trying policyd-spf on valhalla.nano-srv
ay of implementing plugins anyway,
for me
i use the rep plugin since 1 year with no major good or bad results
its use seems not wide spreaded by whatever reason
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
assin/amavis filter
afterwards
the recommended way is to let authed user use submission port
submission 587/tcp , without configured the filter for it in master.cf
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 17.12.2010 20:50, schrieb Jason Bertoch:
> On 2010/12/17 2:48 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> forget trusted_networks use i.e spamass-milter
>> with spamassassin with option -I: skip (ignore) checks if sender is
>> authenticated
>
> Though I've not used spama
E=spamass-milter
DAEMON=/usr/sbin/spamass-milter
SOCKET=/var/spool/postfix/spamass-milter/spamass.sock
PIDFILE=/var/spool/postfix/spamass-milter/spamass.pid
DESC="Sendmail milter plugin for SpamAssassin"
OPTIONS="-f -e -x -I -u vmail -r 15 -i 127.0.0.1"
RUNAS="postfix"
use spamass-milter!
as far i know this bug was fixed last year
on a standart default postfix this
rcpt to: root+:"|touch /tmp/foo"
doesnt work anyway
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
t; RCPT TO:
> 501 5.1.3 Bad recipient address syntax
> QUIT
> 221 2.0.0 Bye
>
> Can anyone confirm this?
>
> p@rick
>
>
Hi Patrick the Problem was fixed last year, as far i know,
it never worked with default postfix settings
also the x switch isnt wide used
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?29136
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ter/default
+ * Use new popenenv function instead of open; fixes remote code exploit
+ as the spamass-milter user when run using -x. (closes: #573228)
+
+ -- Don Armstrong Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:59:39 -0700
+
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
checkin that has since been fixed.
> There is little activity on the spamass-milter project because it
> doesn't need anything; almost all updates go to SA and the MTAs rather
> than the milter.
>
> As noted by Robert Schetterer, postfix doesn't allow this syntax
> anymo
our assistance.
>
> Simon
>
>
you might use spampd ( standalone ) or i.e chain it with clamsmtp
( did this for years ) , or better use clamav-milter,spamass-milter
try amavis...
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
max-conn-per-child=num Maximum connections accepted
by child
check for timeouts in
dns related stuff like rbls
and/or thing like razor,pyzor,dcc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 20.03.2011 22:09, schrieb JKL:
> On 03/20/2011 10:04 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 21:37 +0100, JKL wrote:
>>> I noticed a problem that started this morning, where postfix was
>>> timing out whilst talking with the spamass-milter. Looking further into
>>> this, I se
r/sbin/sendmail.postfix -oi -f ${sender}
> ${recipient}
>
>
>
>
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf <http://main.cf>:
> -
> eader_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
>
>
>
>
> /etc/postfix/header_checks:
> ---
>
>
> /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT s...@mikey.com <mailto:s...@mikey.com>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> --
>
> Jack
>
your setup postfix with spamassassin is not optimal ( after all it
should work, didnt checked your parameters ), better use i.e spamass-milter
i dont believe this mailto working
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT s...@mikey.com <mailto:s...@mikey.com>
i recommend to read again examples with your kind of setup
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
e there are some more, but these are those which I was able to grep.
> However, I have tried to train Spamassassin but it give only a score of
> 2-4.
>
> Does someone know more about this crap?
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
> Michelle Konzack
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
match SPF, it
> should not apply to domains we are designed to send mail for .
> (SPF records include us)
>
>
> ... any other ideas?
try using clamav-milter with sanesecurity antispam signatures
this should avoid a lot of outgoing spam
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
dns entries
so if you want blacklist with spf do it selective
i.e with some milter
but wouldnt recommend it anyway
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 07.10.2011 10:03, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:54:09 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> but wouldnt recommend it anyway
>
> why would i like to whitelist a unknown spammer ?
>
> thinking more about it would get me mad :-)
>
>
in my eyes the w
Am 07.10.2011 20:24, schrieb Dave Warren:
> On 10/7/2011 1:12 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> in my eyes the whole idea of spf was broken from beginning
>> but do what you want, no need for flame
>> in my real world it makes more problems then helping in antispam
>> i
er, at your site and on other sites
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 13.10.2011 10:07, schrieb jdow:
> On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
>>> The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
>>> their
>>> list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want AL
of servers out there arel configured correctly
> so that whitelist_auth works correctly?
>
>
you should choose another way for whitelisting,
i.e bypass spamassassin for trusted server ips etc
anyway why not using i.e. whitelist_from *@somebody.co ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
you may write some ruleset for domains but i dont think
it will help a lot, over the time
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
n age, as there where a possibility
for "tasting" domains, but as i remember this isnt possible anymore
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
it would be useful to list on the spamassassin wiki.
>
> The best RBLS for getting rid of snow-shoe spammers are from Invaluement,
> but it is avaiable by subscription only. I don't know if Rob McEwen
> has any interest in running it through GA...
>
>
the best rbl
but be aware
you might get doubles with bayes store, this should be ignored
but i am told PostgreSQL is better in replacation stuff
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
the same
sender address
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 16.12.2011 12:59, schrieb Ram:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 10:20 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 09.12.2011 13:58, schrieb Ram:
>>> If I want to mark *all* invite mails as spam
>>>
>>> linkedin, WAYN , facebook , google+ or anything else.
>>
;
>
> Office: 7020 0979
>
> Direct: 3336 9974
>
> Mobile: 5120 1096
>
> Fax:7020 0978
>
> Web: www.techbiz.dk <http://www.techbiz.dk>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
drives for
> speed. Also using InnoDB. I'm beginning to wonder if it is ever going to
> work and if someone is going to fix it?
>
what makes you think it does not work ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
users no Problem so far
>
> On 12/21/2011 8:54 AM, Christian Grunfeld wrote:
>> Bayes in MySQL works great for my with only one user !
>> In my previous setup with per user bayes in mysql was a mess !
>>
>> Cheers
>> Christian
>>
>> 2011/12/21 Robert
ormance tweaks
however 250K messages/day seems not that much to me
scanning outbound mail with spamd ,was slow here too,i only use
clamav-milter with sanesecurity for that, also for inbound before
spamass-milter
but no flames, for performance issues, a look to the total mailsetup
is needed ever, there is no straight right or wrong most cases
only analysing the bottlenecks will help
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 23.12.2011 02:45, schrieb Marc Perkel:
>
>
> On 12/21/2011 10:58 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 21.12.2011 19:10, schrieb Kris Deugau:
>>> Marc Perkel wrote:
>>>> I've been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work.
>>&g
nalyse your logs an make special setups related to ips
,domains etc sometimes
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ositive spam quota is mostly
relevant, this should be small as possible, but there will ever be spam
bypass filters, react on that, with fitting targetting actions is your
job as postmaster
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
the IP is caught from a previous spam campaign. But if you're not
> using all the best DNSBLs, you miss out on some of this!
>
> MORE: And, btw, really good /24 blacklists do _preemptively_ block much
> snowshoe spam, from the very 1st spam sent!
>
Hi Rob, read postfix archive
with postfix
and these are the problem senders
as short workaround make a sender reject table
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 27.01.2012 08:31, schrieb Tom Kinghorn:
> On 27/01/2012 09:25, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> if you are with postfix
>> and these are the problem senders
>> as short workaround make a sender reject table
> Hi Robert
>
> I have a regex sender reject table but t
and whitelist one reciept before from that domain
should work, did you test?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
oneiric (mail): Perl-based spam filter using text analysis
3.3.2-1: all
simple recompile the debian way
or look in a ppa
https://launchpad.net/~patrickdk/+archive/general-lucid/+packages
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ly sure if this fixes your problem but i have set
score RDNS_NONE 0
cause the "default" points at this parameter looks like nonsense to me
i have also a scenario with private net relays which will not have any
reverse dns records ever
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 24.02.2012 15:00, schrieb RW:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:32:35 +0100
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> > I am not realy sure if this fixes your problem but i have set
>> >
>> > score RDNS_NONE 0
>> >
>> > cause the "default" points a
>> the email at SMTP session.
>>
>> Can we do that with spamassassin 3.3.2 ?
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
installation with virtual users
> (vpopmail, LDAP, SQL) where all mailboxes are owned from the same ID and
> works fine also with a huge number of users.
>
> Plus, you can use user preferences in SQL for build custom interfaces or
> read it from external appliance.
>
> Ciao
agree ,users setup in sql or ldap is isp style
no need for other layouts
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
a learn-spam folder.
>
i use a spam/ham forward email transport
something like here
http://patrick-wessel.de/projektlinuxserver/spamtraining-mit-perl/
http://www.localside.net/sal-wrapper/
but to be honest, its not widly used and needed
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
This works well for me and could be trivially adapted to any country,
> but ymmv.
>
>
> Martin
>
>
more trival, if the sender address is always the same reject it on mta
level, if you arent afraid about loosing other mail from this ip
mailserver reject the ip in total
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
nged
> This method of language learning is super easy.
> Please confirm that this update is accurate.
> Teach yourself a new foreign language in 10 days
>
> Just being curious. Yesterday I got another 10 different domains.
>
>
Hi Per, nothing special like that, was
t. Thus
if you want to use this type of zone to change the behavior of the
global forward option (that is, "forward first to", then "forward only",
or vice versa, but want to use the same servers as set globally) you
need to re-specify the global forwarders.
so perhaps delete
somthing like
forward first;
in your config
and/or as said cancel forwarders section total
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
eality shows users dont use it very wise
perhaps clicking field spam and delte are to near etc or they are simply
dummy
my conclusion dont waste your time to implement complicated mechs
for ham/spam training, work on the tagging/rejecting side to reduce
false positive rate
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>
>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>>
>>
Am 22.03.2012 09:15, schrieb xTrade Assessory:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>
>>
>> however , i have a ham/spam transport learn mail address,
>> nearly null users forwards something to it, no wonder
>> the false positve rate is nearly null
>>
>> i
Am 22.03.2012 09:43, schrieb xTrade Assessory:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> spam often is very recipient related
>> i.e my beloved spambot armee relocated from china/us now to india/brasil
>> during last year , looks like thats trendy
>
>
> regarding BR
>
&g
Am 22.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>>>> Has anyone else noticed t
Am 22.03.2012 10:30, schrieb xTrade Assessory:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
>> what are they try to push...?
>
>
> I guess that is easy and simple ... the more the merrier
>
> they are smart but we got smarter too an
Am 22.03.2012 10:33, schrieb Axb:
> On 03/22/2012 10:19 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
Am 22.03.2012 10:40, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 22.03.2012 10:33, schrieb Axb:
>> On 03/22/2012 10:19 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>>>> Robert Schetterer wrote
Am 23.03.2012 09:02, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> It's also the rate of change that is
>>> interesting - I very rarely see two emails with the same link.
>>>
>>
>> one more in
1
>>>> Pompano Beach FL 33069
>>>> US
>>>>
>>>> I'm checking if anyone else seen this and has anyone able to stop
>>>> this tspam from these domains hiding behind (or they just a front
>>>> for) these domain privacy services for spamm
start spamassassin
afterwards
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
spf records, also strict ones
also any legal mail sender
in deed many spammers have valid spf entries in dns
in case of hacked accounts at big mailers like yahoo,aol etc
you have also valid dkim too, so at the end body content filtering needs
to be done however
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Am 12.07.2012 09:08, schrieb Andrzej A. Filip:
> On 07/12/2012 09:01 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:50:59 +0200
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> spf does not solve spam problems in general, its may only one from
>>> many paramete
oad.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/languages:/perl/SLE_10/.../perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1-46.1.i586.rpm
why are you thinking 3.3.1 isnt good enough for you ?
i am on 3.3.1-1 on ubuntu lucid lts it works still nice
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Am 11.10.2012 19:45, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 11.10.2012 18:52, schrieb Joseph Acquisto:
>>>>>> Kevin Miller 10/11/12 12:40 PM >>>
>>> In the past, when I've asked in the SUSE forums they have put out newer
>>> versions of cl
Am 15.10.2012 15:30, schrieb mgia:
>> which server is in charge of content filter? both of them?
> Yes, both of them.
>
>
use spamassassin mysql setup, as described in the faqs i.e master and
two slaves etc, bayes sql may not be ideal
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
um then unmonitor
if failed permission 755 then unmonitor
if failed uid root then unmonitor
if failed gid root then unmonitor
check file spamd_rc with path /etc/init.d/spamd
group mail
if failed checksum then unmonitor
if failed permission 755 then unmonitor
if failed uid
for my needs
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender:
is the best way to fight it?
first secure the account,
then consider using something like fail2ban to firewall auto
if possible use i.e postscreen, and rbls
normally it makes no sense to report botnets
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
F
Am 18.11.2012 19:35, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 18.11.2012 14:08, schrieb Michael Monnerie:
>> We've got one users e-mail password hacked, and at the sime time a lot
>> of different IPs started to use that address. Here is the list. How
>> should we report those IP
y one part of
the problem, postfix etc has few stuff to fight incomming spam, other
questions are not really topic of the postfix or spamassassin list ,
cause they are based in more complex and different reasons.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46
er of taste
amavis has tons of more features but therefor its more complex
anyway in milter mode you are able to reject on smtp income stage
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsg
an greatly mitigate the problems caused by initial greylisting delays.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
greylisting isnt state of art, however it might helpfull in some domains
( everyone has its own spam), using postscreen with postfix before
selective greylisting is a good choice
Best Regar
ore
individual targetting these days
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/sudden-increase-in-spam-tp103247.html
> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
ext:
> http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Whitelist-and-DNS-blacklists-in-SpamAssassin-tp103262.html
> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziska
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
