Am 29.07.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Dianne Skoll: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:21:04 +0200 > Robert Schetterer <r...@sys4.de> wrote: > >> now compare with pure postscreen > > I don't use postfix or postscreen.
hm.. that does not fit the subject..why did you involved yourself ? All I'm showing is that greylisting > stops a lot of mail, quite cheaply. hopefully not *g, i think you mean spam mails... you may get that quite better, i see a lot of server greylisting useless ,only filling up others queues waiting for a second slot ,so it may only cheap for you but not for your partners Dont slow down communication if you dont need to And hardly anyone notices it. > > This is a production system filtering email for hundreds of thousands > of people. :) It's not something I'm going to run experiments on > by turning off greylisting just to see what happens. its up to you using more up2date tec stuff, be sure postscreen is used in equal setups then yours and is well tested > > Regards, > > Dianne. > Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
