Am 05.03.2017 um 13:09 schrieb Groach: > Its called "NOLISTING" - but does it work?
everyone has his own spam nobody can say whats best at your site analyse your logs and the choose what to do best, you may follow best practice but Greylisting , Nolisting are very old practices there are better ones now ,like postscreen etc you should avoid use Greylisting , Nolisting cause of many its disadvantages by design however this was discussed extremly before , search list archive to catch pro/contra > > An experiment was carried out on a small throughput server. Here is the > conclusion: https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=185262#p185262 > > (You'll be surprised). > > > On 05/03/2017 06:32, Rob Gunther wrote: >> We have run our servers with a decoy, our MX records have been like >> this for 10+ years: >> >> mx0.example.com <http://mx0.example.com> >> mx1.example.com <http://mx1.example.com> >> mx2.example.com <http://mx2.example.com> >> >> mx1 & mx2 are real servers. mx0 is nothing, it points to an IP >> address that is controlled by us but there is no server. >> >> The concept being that some spammers attempt that server, get nothing >> and don't bother trying any other server. >> >> This has been fine for a decade. Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
