10 days and still being abused badly. Recommending for everyone to just
refuse any .pw
for those wanting an SA rule, here:
header PW_IS_BAD_TLDFrom =~ /\.pw\b/
describe PW_IS_BAD_TLDPW TLD ABUSE
score PW_IS_BAD_TLD3
Change score to whatever you want. Enjoy.
--Chris
The owner is NameCheap, Inc.
A quick google will bring up historical problems with NameCheap and its
owner and its DBAs.
I dare not say anything bad about them and let you judge for yourself on
their history. Richard Kirkendall has a tendency to yell "Slander!" when
someone even mentions their
g us know about the issue.
>
> So, if you are having problems with domains registered with
> Namecheap, I
> suggest that you open a support request for the "Domains -- Legal and
> Abuse" department. From the sounds of it, you'd be doing us
> all a big favor!
>
Hypothetically if one were running a reputation system and didn't want to
block all of a TLD like .pw, one could:
Locally cache whois info
create a local rbl
check against a sending domain on the whois info based on both the registrar
and the creation date
Created On:08-May-2013 05:24:04 UTC
Name
I posted this yesterday
for those wanting an SA rule, here:
header PW_IS_BAD_TLDFrom =~ /\.pw\b/
describe PW_IS_BAD_TLDPW TLD ABUSE
score PW_IS_BAD_TLD3
Change score to whatever you want. Enjoy.
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Orlitzky [mailto:mich...@orli
98.136.218.139
Host Name: nm12-vm10.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Listed on: Sorbs, Spamcop, and Lashback
Causing lots of FPs
Thanks,
Chris Santerre
SysAdmin and Spamfighter
> -Original Message-
> From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.eu]
> Sent: 2013-11-12 13:52
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Heads up, yahoo server on some blacklists!
>
>
> Chris Santerre skrev den 2013-11-12 19:24:
> > 98.136.218.139
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
> Sent: 2014-07-28 12:55
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Ready to throw in the towel on email providing...
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Greg Ledford wrote:
>
> The only thing that evolves faster than b
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 8:59 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Bogus Virus Warnings and RDJ
>
>
> I seem to be having another problem with getting the above
> ruleset again.
> Anyone else:
>
> Date: Sa
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Peuhkurinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:02 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Stupid rule question
>
>
>Michael W Cocke wrote:
>> This is really getting on my nerves... Using Spamassassin
>3.03, could
>> someone please t
b 208
Opening HTML code: (Note the double codes!)
as well. So Thunderbird for Mac is FUBAR and
hits our bad HTML coding. Which looks for HTML code before the opening
tag, as well as after the closing one.
HTH,
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:24 AM
>To: SATalk
>Cc: SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: Applying SURBL against blog comment spammers
>
>
>On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:25:40 PM, Matthew Hunter wrote:
>> I just whipped u
>-Original Message-
>From: Rob McEwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 9:54 AM
>To: 'SURBL Discussion list'; 'Jeff Chan'; 'SATalk'
>Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: Applying SURBL against blog comment
>spammers
>
>
>>SO I say, go ahead and add them.
>
>Chris..
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 1:24 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Apache to Microsoft: who needs Sender-ID?
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>http://apache.org/foundation/doc
--
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Matthew Hunter writes:
>> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:36:29AM -0400, Chris Santerre
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >-Original Message-
>> > >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >Sent: Thurs
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 2:04 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Matthew Hunter; SATalk; SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: Applying SURBL against blog comment spammers
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 9:04 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: Applying SURBL against blog comment spammers
>
>
>On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:43:26 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
>>> Given th
>-Original Message-
>From: Gordon Thagard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 2:29 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Those sneaky porno spammers
>
>
>Solaris 9
>Postfix 2.1.x
>Spamassassin 2.64
>Amavisd-new-20030616-p10
>Clamav-0.74
>Bayes
>Razor
>DCC
amcop_uri_rbl('sc.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')describe
>SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in spamcop database at
>sc.surbl.org
>tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL net
>score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 4.0
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>>>-Original Message-
*snip*
>
>Thanks for your stats and checking, and yes please anyone else
>with ham corpora, please check for FPs.
>
There is one SARE ninja testing guru that will come online with SURBL when
3.0 is released. I expect a LOT of testing, because he is addicted to it :)
He's actually been trying to wo
>-Original Message-
>From: William Stearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 10:33 AM
>To: ML-spamassassin-talk
>Cc: ML-spamassassin-talk; William Stearns
>Subject: Re: Learning the ropes
>
>
>Good morning, Tom,
>
>On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Tom wrote:
>
>> I am tryin
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 11:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: SpamAssassin help
>
>
>From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "lloe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> Hello lloe,
>>
>> Tuesday, September 7, 2004
h?q=define:+usability
Is MIT teaching a course in useless sarcasim now? Both of your responses do
nothing to help this conversation.
Next time Bob might just answer RTFM, instead of actually trying to help
you.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http:
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:51 AM
>To: Pierre Thomson
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Unreasonable penalty for AOL addresses ending in numbers?
>
>
>Hello Pierre,
>
>Wednesday, September 8, 20
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 4:05 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: ANNOUNCE: ApacheCon US 2004 (SpamAssassin Sessions!)
>
>
>ApacheCon US 2004
>
> Alexis Park Resort
> Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
> 13-1
>-Original Message-
>From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 10:52 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Usability. Spamassassin.
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>>
>>Is MIT teaching a course
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Sabatke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:35 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Unreasonable penalty for AOL addresses ending in numbers?
>
>
>Martin Hepworth wrote:
>> Jim
>>
>> Pierre's scores are similar t
ary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wed 9/8/2004 2:16 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: ApacheCon US 2004 (SpamAssassin Sessions!)
>
>
>
>Since no one else is offering I guess I'll go with you... Do
>you know if they a
>-Original Message-
>From: Rob Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 1:08 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Catching Windows executables as attachments
>
>
>I have currently tuned my SARE spam filters, and am humming
>right along, I get
>o
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:07 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: SARE_FRAUD vs SURBLs (Was: RE: Mass-check errors)
>
>
>On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:12:26 AM, Smart,Dan Smart,Dan wrote:
>> What I found was th
>-Original Message-
>From: John Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 1:25 PM
>To: Spamassassin users
>Subject: Re: rules_du_jour
>
>
>Chris Thielen said:
>> Hi John
>>
>> On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:10 -0500, John Fleming wrote:
>>> I've been manually updatin
OK, this isn't the first time we've had this discussion, but Raymond and I
felt this should be made public again. He ran thru some tests of 1500+
domains and found the following data. Looks like they maybe send from
zombies, and never their hosts. IPs are similar across the board.
So is there a w
>-Original Message-
>From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:10 PM
>To: Alex Broens
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SURBL
>Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>Hi!
>
>> Chris, Raymond ,
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:14 PM
>To: SpamAssassin Users; SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:05:28 PM, Alex Broens wrote:
>>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:17 PM
>To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
>Cc: Alex Broens;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; SURBL
>Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>-
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:26 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>On Thursday, September
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:18 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail)
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>At 04:56 PM 9/9/2004,
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:53 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail)
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: RE: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>At 05:23 PM 9/9
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 8:44 PM
>To: Jeff Chan
>Cc: Pete McNeil; SURBL Discussion list; Spamassassin-Talk
>Subject: Re: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 5:34:05 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 6:16 PM
>To: SURBL Discuss; SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: Start an IP list to block?
>
>
>On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:26:37
ED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Jeff Chan writes:
>> On Friday, September 10, 2004, 7:27:06 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> > WOW! I think this would hit more FPs then listing the IP!
>Am I wrong there!
>> > I would never list the name server, as they may be hostin
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:06 AM
>To: Spamassassin
>Subject: Re: SURBL
>
>
>On Friday, September 10, 2004, 5:31:48 AM, John Fleming wrote:
>> Of course, I have another question - Should I enable the redirects??:
>
>>
>-Original Message-
>From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:30 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Catching Windows executables as attachments
>
>
>On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 03:48:17AM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> > First, the body-mime head
>-Original Message-
>From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 11:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: what about non-marked spam?
>
>
>> What are you doing about spam that goes through being scored
>too low for
>> spamassassin to get it? Do y
emove. (I
don't think there are any of those.)
The 2 additions can be found here:
http://tinyurl.com/6meph
and
http://tinyurl.com/4j4ur
Enjoy!
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survive
I figured is you were gonna start another group flame war, we should do it
correctly.
1) SA should block viruses
2) Top posting makes girlz hot!
3) All lists need tags in subject.
3b) All democrats sell poison milk to school children.
5) OMGHI2Uone!!GOTPICS?
6) abortion
7) Afirmitive actio
In case people have been ignoring the Subject Line thread, I wanted to
really make sure people had a look at this post. I use the example below for
many things. When I write a particularly interesting SARE rule I am testing,
I will have procmail/formail tag the subject if the rule hits. This way I
>-Original Message-
>From: Chr. von Stuckrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 5:41 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Phishing obfuscated url detection
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:17:15AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September
ut on this page, feel free to
spam it to all your friends and family! ;)
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rant.html
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the
>-Original Message-
>From: Michele Neylon : Blacknight Solutions
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:02 PM
>To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: test
>
>
>Test.
C- at best.
You failed to fill out the extra credit. You didn't completely fill in the
circ
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Spammers Bypassing Whitelists
>
>
>I'm seeing spammers bypass whitelists by appending a few
>characters to my
>own username and us
ouldn't have to ever pay taxes ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:24 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Memory usage question
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 17,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:02 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: After starting spamd, spamc fails to connect to it and spamd
>stops running!?
>
>
>Will anyone please help me?
>
> I've recently ha
Passing this on
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:57 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Subject: Apache bounced my email
>
>
>Please pass this along to the list. Apache.org is using the dsbl.org
>blacklist tha
>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:12 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: O'Reilly Spamassassin book
>
>
>Has anyone got a copy and read through the O'Reilly book for
>SpamAssassin?
>http://www.oreilly.com/cata
ssage-
>> From: Matt Krause [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 6:05 PM
>> To: Robert G. Werner
>> Cc: Chris Santerre; Ken Jackson; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: O'Reilly Spamassassin book
>>
>> I finis
>-Original Message-
>From: Kang , Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 3:56 PM
>To: Spamassassin-Users (users@spamassassin.apache.org)
>Subject: [OT]: Charting the history of SPAM
>
>
>I got this off of boingboing.net:
>
>"I [Raymond Chen, Microsoft] ha
>-Original Message-
>From: Kang , Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:18 PM
>To: 'Chris Santerre'
>Subject: RE: [OT]: Charting the history of SPAM
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris
I just updated Bigevil, which now is 1.25 megs in size. It will consume the
souls of your server, your family, and that cute girl/guy at your local
coffee shop!
With the release of SA 3.0, for the love of all that is digital, use SURBL!!
Tell your ISP's to upgrade. Tell them to contact me to be
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:21 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SlashDotting spammers
>
>
>Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Is anyone else having trouble getting to the SA website?
--chris
I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
Anyone else?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:06 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: 'Jim Maul'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SlashDotting spammers
>
>
>On Thu, 23 Se
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Huber
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:49 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: timeout www.spamassasin.org ?
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> I keep getting a timeout go
ewing with people's minds. :-)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
LOL, it is official, I am taking my own advice. I am upgrading my live
server from 2.4x! And I think the experiment was a complete success
I never upgraded live server from 2.4x because I wanted to see how good I
could get that system working without Bayes and net tests. 2.4x ran
perfectly the
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob Apthorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 3:30 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [sa-list] Re: Bundle::SpamAssassin
>
>
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:26:04 +0100 Julian Field
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A
This is what I use:
> : sbl.spamhaus.org
> : bl.spamcop.net
> : cbl.abuseat.org
> : http.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : web.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : nomail.dnsbl.sorbs.net
Use DelayCh
>-Original Message-
>From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:56 PM
>To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
>
>
>At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=>
>>Hi!
>>
>>>Rejects Since Sunda
Just as it says. exit0.us seems to be down with a DB error.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Mário Gamito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:18 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Is there a way...
>
>
>... to prevent a single and specific account only to be parsed by
>spamassassin ?
>
>Any help would be apprecia
>-Original Message-
>From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 6:01 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Congratulations and Thank You!!
>
>
>Just wanted to pass along a note of congratulations for the release of
>version 3.0.0. My upgrade wen
What was the reason WS got such a low score in SA 3.0??? .5 is a joke! Hell
BigEvil was scored a 3 and now one complained, and it is the same data!! I
don't understand. Did the mass check not go well?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surb
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:31 AM
>To: SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Re: SA 3.0 and Bigevil
>
>
>On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 6:46:00 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 05:03:34PM -0700, Jeff
e 3.0 running. Best to tackle those later.
HTH,
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 11:10 AM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Why such a low score?
>
>
>Chris,
>
>&g
Any chance of getting a run for rescoring of the SURBL lists?
--Chris (Perceptron is on my list of things to master.)
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:26 PM
>To: Matt Kettler
>Cc: Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:56 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Why such a low score?
>
>
>At 01:31 PM 9/29/2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>Any chance of getting a
I decided not to go, because Gary wouldn't bunk with me :) Well, then there
is the whole bail money thing..
For those of you going, remember to bring your airhorns to heckle with! ;)
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Gary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:37 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: 'Spam Forensics: Reverse-Engineering Spammer Tactics'
>
>
>My slides from the presentation I gave at Toorcon 2004, 'Spam
>Foren
Yes, I asked SURBL a while back about this as well. I saw a slight decline
during the Huricane weeks.
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:10 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Sorry Florida.
>
>
>I've
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x2.7 seconds
3.0 30.4 seconds
OH MY! Network test :)
Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the sp
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:05 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: 2.6 -> 3.0 migration questions
>
>
>At 04:43 PM 9/30/2004, Ben Rosengart wrote:
>>we are pretty unhappy about the skimpy upgrade d
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:23 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: scan times up!
>
>
>At 05:10 PM 9/30/2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>Well...
>>
&
Island is part of NY, or I'd
be in trouble! Sorry for the OT post, but its not everyday you get to take
part in breaking a celeb's leg :)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that surv
>-Original Message-
>From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM
>To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: scan times up!
>
>
>On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Well...
>>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 8:14 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: spamassassin stats from the new log file format
>
>
>I've been admiring the new logging that SA 3.* does and wondered if
>anyone has
Something is seriously wrong with your setup! Move all cf files except
local.cf out of the
/etc/mail/spamassassin dir and restart spamd. What does it read then?
There is no way spamd should be that large!!
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I don't get his one at all!!! WTH???
I'm CC'ing to SURBL because look at the MX for this domain!
uniprepacademy.com dns_mx:
neti-outblaze-com.mr.outblaze.com
neti-outblaze-com-bk.mr.outblaze.com
I know it didn't come form that domain, but the advertised part of this
email points
er 01, 2004 11:52 AM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
>
>
>ok, all I had in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir was my local.cf and
>the init.pre. I've cleaned the local.cf according to th
>-Original Message-
>From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:11 PM
>To: Kurt Buff
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail); 'Chris Santerre'
>Subject: Re: [ot] NASCAR fans gonna be mad at me :)
>
>
>
>On Oct 1, 2004, at 1
>-Original Message-
>From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:48 PM
>To: Spamassassin-Users
>Subject: [SA-List] IPlanet and SA
>
>
>We are currently seeing emails from external customers being marked as
>spam in SA when they come from an ISP calle
if you're using procmail, you could put formail into the mix.
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob Branch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:42 AM
>To: sa-list
>Subject: multiple score based subject/headers
>
>
>I want to set spamassassin so that messages that
nt advice visit
>http://www.nmsusers.org
>
>To have principles...
> First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!!
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:23
This is from an FP I got this morning. Legit ham subject!
"See Children's Letters To God- as low as $25*!":-)
Its the name of a Broadway show. Good grief these legit newsletters need to
meet us halfway!
--Chris
essage-
>> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM
>> To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>> Subject: RE: scan times up!
>>
>>
>>
>> >-Original Message-
>> &g
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:50 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: HUMOR: Legit ham subject
>
>
>Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
>-Original Message-
>From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: RE: scan times up!
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> If
>-Original Message-
>From: Gaal Yahas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 9:39 AM
>To: Spamassassin talk list
>Subject: Spellcheck plugin?
>
>
>I'm wondering, would it be useful to have a plugin that
>penalizes messages
>with many spelling mistakes? This might he
1 - 100 of 642 matches
Mail list logo
