>-----Original Message----- >From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:50 PM >To: Chris Santerre >Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >Subject: Re: HUMOR: Legit ham subject > > >Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This is from an FP I got this morning. Legit ham subject! >> >> "See Children's Letters To God- as low as $25*!" :-) >> >> Its the name of a Broadway show. Good grief these legit >newsletters need to >> meet us halfway! > >Which rules caused the FP?
Content analysis details: (8.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 SARE_SUB_AS_LOW_AS Subject contains apparent spammer phrasing 0.4 MY_POWERMTA PowerMTA is evil???? 1.7 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally 0.6 MY_PHRS_LOW BODY: low scoring phrases found 0.4 EXCUSE_19 BODY: Claims you opted-in or registered 0.7 MY_LEARN BODY: Learn something new? 1.0 MY_PHRS_MED BODY: medium scoring phrases found 0.3 URI_OFFERS URI: Message has link to company offers 0.0 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 SARE_HTML_FONT_INVIS2 RAW: contains HTML color which is likely spamsign 0.2 MY_CLICK RAW: Asks to click 0.6 MY_WIDTH RAW: Width 1 or 0 0.4 MY_OBFU_LONG RAW: One long word! 0.6 MY_HEIGHT RAW: Height 1 or 0 0.2 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase 0.0 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay If I added right, 5.5 points came from my custom rules! Not the normal 3.0 install. I haven't changed my custom (Non SARE) rules since the upgrade from 2.4x to 3.0. I'm thinking of removing them for now, as with SARE+SURBL+SA 3.0 gets spam high enough already. So no worries mate! --Chris
