>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:37 PM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: 'Spam Forensics: Reverse-Engineering Spammer Tactics' > > >My slides from the presentation I gave at Toorcon 2004, 'Spam >Forensics: >Reverse-Engineering Spammer Tactics', are now up, if anyone's >interested >in having a read ;) > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/presentations/2004-09-Toorcon/html >
Very nice. Page 13: Detecting Hashbusters, 2, who the hell figured that out? Damn! SARE has run into the problem that there isn't much NEW in spam to tag on. SA, SURBL, and SARE have 99% of everything covered. Like you stated, most of their tricks now end up being tagged. I'm real curious as to what they try next....cause I'm kind of stumped as to how to get around this. Think like a spammer to catch one. --Chris
