>
> Thanks very much for your kindly help. I have done some testing this
> morning.
>
> And found that, all the SA 3.2.x versions are unworkable.
>
> Here are some output:
>
> #spamassassin -V
>
> SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
> running on Perl version 5.8.5
>
> The OS is CentOS 4.4 with perl
Hello, Matt,
Thanks very much for your kindly help. I have done some testing this
morning.
And found that, all the SA 3.2.x versions are unworkable.
Here are some output:
#spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
running on Perl version 5.8.5
The OS is CentOS 4.4 with perl version is 5.
Penghui Wang wrote:
I have tested via the sendmail command:
#sendmail wangph < none-subject
#sendmail wangph < have-subject
#cat none-subject
This is the message body.
#cat have-subject
Subject: This is the message subject
This is the message body.
Both of them marked with MISSING_SUBJEC
Matt Kettler wrote:
Penghui Wang wrote:
Hello, list,
I have tested three versions of SA. And found some special results.
SA 3.0.5 (RPM from DAG)
SA 3.1.7 (Debian Apt & RPM from DAG)
SA 3.2.4 (RPM from DAG)
In the default rule 20_head_test.cf
There are several lines like the follow
header
Penghui Wang wrote:
Hello, list,
I have tested three versions of SA. And found some special results.
SA 3.0.5 (RPM from DAG)
SA 3.1.7 (Debian Apt & RPM from DAG)
SA 3.2.4 (RPM from DAG)
In the default rule 20_head_test.cf
There are several lines like the follow
header __HAS_SUBJECT
On 04.03.08 17:56, Penghui Wang wrote:
> There are several lines like the follow
>
> header __HAS_SUBJECTexists:Subject
> meta MISSING_SUBJECT!__HAS_SUBJECT
> describe MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header
>
> In the VERSION 3.0.5 and 3.2.4, i found whether or not
Hello, list,
I have tested three versions of SA. And found some special results.
SA 3.0.5 (RPM from DAG)
SA 3.1.7 (Debian Apt & RPM from DAG)
SA 3.2.4 (RPM from DAG)
In the default rule 20_head_test.cf
There are several lines like the follow
header __HAS_SUBJECTexists:Subject
meta
