Hello, Matt,
Thanks very much for your kindly help. I have done some testing this
morning.
And found that, all the SA 3.2.x versions are unworkable.
Here are some output:
#spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
running on Perl version 5.8.5
The OS is CentOS 4.4 with perl version is 5.8.5.
I have test the follow versions comming from
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/spamassassin/
spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm
spamassassin-3.1.8-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm <spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm>
spamassassin-3.2.0-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm <spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm>
spamassassin-3.2.1-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm <spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm>
spamassassin-3.2.2-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm <spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm>
spamassassin-3.2.3-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm <spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm>
spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm <spamassassin-3.1.7-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm>
All the 3.1.x versions are working great:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -t < /var/mail/have-subject
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on
localhost.localdomain
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS,NO_RECEIVED,
NO_RELAYS,SUB_HELLO,TO_CC_NONE autolearn=no version=3.1.7
Subject: Hello
Hello
Spam detection software, running on the system "localhost.localdomain", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hello [...]
Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.8 SUB_HELLO Subject starts with "Hello"
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
0.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
0.1 TO_CC_NONE No To: or Cc: header
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -t < /var/mail/none-subject
Received: from localhost by localhost.localdomain
with SpamAssassin (version 3.1.7);
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:23:41 +0800
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on
localhost.localdomain
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.7 required=5.0
tests=EMPTY_MESSAGE,MISSING_HB_SEP,
MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,TO_CC_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_47CE123D.F36CA2C8"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_47CE123D.F36CA2C8
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "localhost.localdomain", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: [...]
Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message header
and body
0.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
1.5 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
Subject: text
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
0.1 TO_CC_NONE No To: or Cc: header
------------=_47CE123D.F36CA2C8
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello
------------=_47CE123D.F36CA2C8--
Spam detection software, running on the system "localhost.localdomain", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: [...]
Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message header
and body
0.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
1.5 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
Subject: text
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
0.1 TO_CC_NONE No To: or Cc: header
If i use SA 3.2.4.
Here are the output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -t < /var/mail/none-subject
[10310] warn: Possible unintended interpolation of @Mail in string at
/usr/share/spamassassin/00_jp_mailer-tests.cf, rule X_MAILER_SPAM, line 1.
[10310] warn: rules: failed to compile head tests, skipping:
[10310] warn: (Global symbol "@Mail" requires explicit package name at
/usr/share/spamassassin/00_jp_mailer-tests.cf, rule X_MAILER_SPAM, line 1.
[10310] warn: )
Received: from localhost by localhost.localdomain
with SpamAssassin (version 3.2.4);
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:27:13 +0800
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on
localhost.localdomain
X-Spam-Level: ********
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.9 required=5.0
tests=EMPTY_MESSAGE,MISSING_HB_SEP,
MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO
autolearn=no version=3.2.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_47CE1311.DAE65D76"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_47CE1311.DAE65D76
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "localhost.localdomain", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: [...]
Content analysis details: (8.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message header
and body
1.6 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
2.9 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
0.6 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
Subject: text
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
------------=_47CE1311.DAE65D76
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello
------------=_47CE1311.DAE65D76--
Spam detection software, running on the system "localhost.localdomain", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: [...]
Content analysis details: (8.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message header
and body
1.6 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
2.9 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
0.6 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
Subject: text
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -t < /var/mail/have-subject
[10316] warn: Possible unintended interpolation of @Mail in string at
/usr/share/spamassassin/00_jp_mailer-tests.cf, rule X_MAILER_SPAM, line 1.
[10316] warn: rules: failed to compile head tests, skipping:
[10316] warn: (Global symbol "@Mail" requires explicit package name at
/usr/share/spamassassin/00_jp_mailer-tests.cf, rule X_MAILER_SPAM, line 1.
[10316] warn: )
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on
localhost.localdomain
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS,
MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.2.4
Subject: Hello
Hello
Spam detection software, running on the system "localhost.localdomain", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hello [...]
Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
1.6 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
Whether or not has Subject in the header, it always hit the rule
"MISSING SUBJECT".
Do you have any suggestion?
Thanks in advanced
Penghui Wang
I have tested via the sendmail command:
#sendmail wangph < none-subject
#sendmail wangph < have-subject
#cat none-subject
This is the message body.
#cat have-subject
Subject: This is the message subject
This is the message body.
Both of them marked with MISSING_SUBJECT.
So, that's not the condition you have mentained. But thanks any way.
Best regards,
Penghui Wang.
