Matt Kettler wrote:
Penghui Wang wrote:
Hello, list,
I have tested three versions of SA. And found some special results.
SA 3.0.5 (RPM from DAG)
SA 3.1.7 (Debian Apt & RPM from DAG)
SA 3.2.4 (RPM from DAG)
In the default rule 20_head_test.cf
There are several lines like the follow
header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject
meta MISSING_SUBJECT !__HAS_SUBJECT
describe MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
In the VERSION 3.0.5 and 3.2.4, i found whether or not the mail have a
"Subject" in the header part, the MISSING_SUBJECT rules has been hitted.
But in the last version 3.1.7, it works great.
And the same condition with other similar rules, such as __HAS_REVD,
__HAS_RECEIVED etc..
I have diged this for about one day. But there's no result. Does
anyone meet the same problem? Please drop me a message.\
It should work fine in any version that supports metas. (ie: anything
newer than 2.5x)
However, be aware it will only match a message with NO Subject: header.
It will NOT fire off for a message with an empty subject. There must be
no Subject: at all for the rule to work.
I have tested via the sendmail command:
#sendmail wangph < none-subject
#sendmail wangph < have-subject
#cat none-subject
This is the message body.
#cat have-subject
Subject: This is the message subject
This is the message body.
Both of them marked with MISSING_SUBJECT.
So, that's not the condition you have mentained. But thanks any way.
Best regards,
Penghui Wang.
