On 04.03.08 17:56, Penghui Wang wrote: > There are several lines like the follow > > header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject > meta MISSING_SUBJECT !__HAS_SUBJECT > describe MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header > > In the VERSION 3.0.5 and 3.2.4, i found whether or not the mail have a > "Subject" in the header part, the MISSING_SUBJECT rules has been hitted. > But in the last version 3.1.7, it works great. > > And the same condition with other similar rules, such as __HAS_REVD, > __HAS_RECEIVED etc.. > > I have diged this for about one day. But there's no result. Does anyone > meet the same problem? Please drop me a message.\
afaik those headers have to be non-empty, e.g. empty Subject: header matches the MISSING_SUBJECT too. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages." "That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows."
