Hello
Please how i can filter/ban E-Mail from Hotmail, Outlook, with women
pictures.
Yes spamassassin and meny other tools installed and will block meny of bad
E-Mail, the email With picture and more will also transfer.
I think that I am on the right way with the application Spamassassin, I
On 2020-03-24 07:31, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
Anyway of blocking attached spam mail of Corona.
its not a problem if you dont have a bitcoin address, stay safe, only
change email password to be more safe, if the content is right all he
clams is he knows your leaked password
even strong
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:01:46PM +0530, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
> Team,
>
> Anyway of blocking attached spam mail of Corona.
>
it's hitting more than 9 points for me with updated rules.
Most relevant hits are:
1.0 FORGED_SPF_HELONo description available.
0
Team,
Anyway of blocking attached spam mail of Corona.
Regards,
Siddhesh Kadam
--- Begin Message ---
I know eνery dirty lιtτle secreτ αbοuτ yοur lιfe. Tο ρrοve my ροιnτ, tell me, does "28884060" rιng any bell το yοu? It was οne of your passwοrds.
What do I κnow αbοuτ yοu?
Tο
I have not seen that tutorial but you don't have mail flowing spam or
otherwise:
temporary failure. Command output: sendmail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/
main.cf: Permission denied
Fix that and try again.
Happy Friday the 13th, KAM
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 08:54 bobby wrote:
> I am following this
>
> I am following this tutorial:
https://janikarhunen.fi/tackle-spam-with-spamassassin-on-centos-7-and-postfix.
It says that the message should show up, labeled "Spam". But it never
shows up in my inbox. I would appreciate any help. Thanks!
Here is output from my maillog:
Dec 07 00:12:31 mail.
or check http://www.artica.fr that include spamassassin+amavis+end-user mgmt
On 08/07/2010 23:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
google mailzu-ng
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
google mailzu-ng
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On 08/07/10 16:44, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote:
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
-> , Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
DIGEST_MULTI
.
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
Thanks.
--
Salvatore.
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote:
> Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
>
> Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
> -> , Yes, hits=10.22
> tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
> DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
-> , Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.
Daniel Lemke wrote:
>
> Hi, following mail got through SpamAssassin today:
> http://pastebin.com/Z50yqmij
>
> I was just wondering why there were nearly none of standard
> SpamAssassin rules hitting, it's even been whitelisted by HostKarma.
It isn't spam, it's by-subscriber advertising from Sch
eader
* and mail body
* -2.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL RBL: HostKarma: unique whitelisted
* 0.5 KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST DNS-whitelisted sender is not verified
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Cyrillic-spam-mail-tp28327931p28327931.html
Sent from the SpamAss
Karsten,
You're correct in they both have scores. I was not paying close
attention to the headers and also you're correct about my confusion
with defualt SA headers and Amavisd-new headers. I didn't realize
Amavisd used custom SA headers for messages.
Thanks for clarifying this!
-Carlos
On 3/12
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:28 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> I guess I am still lost. SA appears to be working and everything looks
> fine however my emails don't appear to be getting a score and I don't
> understand how that link applies to why SA isn't setting a score on my
> messages when it is cl
> My headers look like:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on mail.iamghost.com
> X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=6.3
> tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.0
>
> *
>
The message scored a 1.0 (score=1.0)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> They'd normally be in local.cf and are needed for any of the URIBL etc
> blacklists to work correctly. See:
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#network_test_options
I guess I am still lost. SA appea
Hello,
Am 2010-03-10 22:17:05, schrieb Carlos Mennens:
> OK so today I got my 1st spam email from someone at a yahoo.com email
> address. Basically SA didn't score it at all and 'Postgray' did it's
> job. Below are the headers from SA:
Be happy, you got only one...
> My question is what do you r
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> You certainly changed the required score: the default is 5.0. The
> standard rule scores are set on that basis. Mine are:
>
> required_score 6.0
> rewrite_header subject SPAM:
> report_safe 1
> use_bayes
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:11 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > That 'male enhancement junk' advert may well contain something that
> > could be the basis of an additional rule - don't omit *anything* in
> > future, at least until you understa
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> That is hard. Only one URL in the body.
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
> DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
>
> L_UNVERIFIED_YAHOO,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSW
On 11.3.2010 16:41, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> You still posted not enough data. There is only the headers the link.
>
> Here is the entire message:
>
> http://pastebin.com/MtXWXdvc
That is hard. Only one URL in the body.
X-Spam-Status:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> You still posted not enough data. There is only the headers the link.
Here is the entire message:
http://pastebin.com/MtXWXdvc
On 11.3.2010 15:18, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
>> here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
>> something to work with.
>
> I am sorry I didn't post
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> That 'male enhancement junk' advert may well contain something that
> could be the basis of an additional rule - don't omit *anything* in
> future, at least until you understand how to write custom rules.
> Spammers often use an algorithm t
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 08:18 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
> > here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
> > something to work with.
>
> I am so
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
> here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
> something to work with.
I am sorry I didn't post enough data.
http://pastebin.com/r8Swp1mu
As for
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:17 +, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> OK so today I got my 1st spam email from someone at a yahoo.com email
> address. Basically SA didn't score it at all and 'Postgray' did it's
> job. Below are the headers from SA:
>
Thats not a lot to go on: only a few headers and no messag
OK so today I got my 1st spam email from someone at a yahoo.com email
address. Basically SA didn't score it at all and 'Postgray' did it's
job. Below are the headers from SA:
X-spam-checker-version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on mail.iamghost.com
X-spam-level:
X-spam-status: No, score=0.0 req
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:25:59 +1100
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2010/1/14 Mariusz Kruk :
> > BTW, as the check definitions seem to be pretty ok at first glance,
> > did you set scoring for those rules, or did you just add the rules?
> > You should get something like:
>
> Yes, I do try with
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:41 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> > Your initial question was not "how to not run articular messages thru
> > SA", but "How to score on existing spam headers". That's a different
> > issue.
> I wanted to mark as spam, mais already tagged spam . At the end of the
> day, I
2010/1/15 Mariusz Kruk :
> Your initial question was not "how to not run articular messages thru
> SA", but "How to score on existing spam headers". That's a different
> issue.
I wanted to mark as spam, mais already tagged spam . At the end of the
day, I achieve the same result.
> As I wrote bef
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:24 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> > that's just what I said - don't run mail through SA _again_.
> Uh Duh!
>
> Do you think I'll be asking here if I knew how to do it?
Your initial question was not "how to not run articular messages thru
SA", but "How to score on exist
Hi
2010/1/14 Mariusz Kruk :
> BTW, as the check definitions seem to be pretty ok at first glance, did
> you set scoring for those rules, or did you just add the rules?
> You should get something like:
Yes, I do try with score associated. I just posted the regex to
simplify thing ; I tried all the
2010/1/15 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
>
> that's just what I said - don't run mail through SA _again_.
Uh Duh!
Do you think I'll be asking here if I knew how to do it?
>
> Note that primary MX can score differently expecially if your users use
> BAYES, AWL etc. In suich case it may be desired to r
> 2010/1/14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> > well, you either trust SA on secondary MX - then don't run the mail through
> > SA again.
On 14.01.10 23:58, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> But not all mails go through the 2nd MX ; so this is exactly what I
> want to do: don't run SA if it went through the 2nd
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 23:58 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> 2010/1/14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> > well, you either trust SA on secondary MX - then don't run the mail through
> > SA again.
>
> But not all mails go through the 2nd MX ; so this is exactly what I
> want to do: don't run SA if it we
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:55 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> How can I write a rule on the primary server that will automatically
> consider the message as spam is the other server detected it as spam.
>
> I tried:
> header PREVIOUS_SPAM X-Spam-Flag =~ /YES/,
> header PREVIOUS_SPAM X-Spam-Status
2010/1/14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> well, you either trust SA on secondary MX - then don't run the mail through
> SA again.
But not all mails go through the 2nd MX ; so this is exactly what I
want to do: don't run SA if it went through the 2nd MX and was tagged
as spam.
On 14.01.10 21:55, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> I have spamassassin running on both my primary and secondary mail
> servers. Often, some spammers send through the secondary mail server ;
> which will then tag them as spam.
>
> When the same message goes through the primary mail server , it is
> tagg
Hi
I have spamassassin running on both my primary and secondary mail
servers. Often, some spammers send through the secondary mail server ;
which will then tag them as spam.
When the same message goes through the primary mail server , it is
tagged as spam once again.
Sometimes one server tags it
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 02:46 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > All scored the same. Can be written as a single rule.
>
> I've spent some time and tried to refine my rules based on your
> advice, guenther. Can I ask you to check them over again and see if
> this is any better, or at least more inclusive?
The
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 03:00 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > mimeheader LOC_CTYP_IMG ((Content-Type =~ /image\/png/) ||
> > (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/) || (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/) ||
>
> I thought this passed through my --lint, but I only caught it the
> second time. I was looki
On 20-Aug-2009, at 10:51, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-
mails:
http://pastebin.ca/1536577
You removed far too many headers for anyone to make a meaningful
comparison.
--
Can I borrow your underpants for 10 minutes?
Hi,
> mimeheader LOC_CTYP_IMG ((Content-Type =~ /image\/png/) ||
> (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/) || (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/) ||
I thought this passed through my --lint, but I only caught it the
second time. I was looking around for the (new) right way to do it,
and found this in 80_addit
Hi,
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_PNG Content-Type =~ /image\/png/
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPEG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/
>
> All scored the same. Can be written as a single rule.
I've spent some time and tried to r
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:58:02 -0500
Chris wrote:
> Ran it through sa-learn as spam, spamassassn -r and -t which scored
> much better:
> ...
>
> 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
Unfortunately that's not a good guide to future performance. Most spams
contain a l
age which is flag
> styled (as the one attached).
>
> Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated, same as the old
> styled spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect nothing,
> I understand because of flagged effect. Also, image file name changes,
>
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:07 PM, MySQL Student wrote:
mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
score AS_090508_CTYP_JPG 0.5
describe AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Rule by AS: Content-Type: JPG
This can probably be scored higher than the others. image/jpg isn't
a valid
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
> A few of these have slipped through on my systems, but for the most
> part, these rules have worked here:
>
> mimeheader AS_090505_CDIS_INLINE Content-Disposition =~ /inline/
> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_PNG Content-Type =~ /image\/png/
> mimeh
Hi,
> Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated, same as the old styled
> spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect nothing, I understand
> because of flagged effect. Also, image file name changes, if it have.
A few of these have slipped through on my system
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Marc Mu?oz Salvador wrote:
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-mails:
http: //pastebin.ca/1536577
http: //pastebin.ca/1536583
The headers on both of those spamples have been severely abridged. You
need to figure out how to get the comple
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:51 +0200, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
> Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two
> e-mails:
>
>
The two I looked at in any detail made it obvious the From: address was
forged because it didn't agree with the earliest Received: header: not
even t
-style JPEG
that works well with my settings.
Those two with only 2 prices are new to me. And there isn't enough
occurrences of the offending words to match with my settings in FuzzyOcr :-(
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spam-mail-with-flagged-style-images-tp25059821
styled (as the one attached).
Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated, same as the old
styled spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect
nothing, I understand because of flagged effect. Also, image file
name changes, if it have.
Any ideas about how to mark this
ket, I'll try to produce a
clean patch to FuzzyOcr & attach it & my scansets/preps to the ticket.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spam-mail-with-flagged-style-images-tp25059821p25064803.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:22 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but
I'm new to the list, and I've been searching before about it
with no success.
I
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:22 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but
> I'm new to the list, and I've been searching before about it
> with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of
he one attached).
>
> Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated, same as the old styled
> spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect nothing, I understand
> because of flagged effect. Also, image file name changes, if it have.
>
> Any ideas about how to m
one, never repeated, same as the old
styled spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect nothing,
I understand because of flagged effect. Also, image file name changes,
if it have.
Any ideas about how to mark this kind of e-mail as spam?
Thank you very much.
--
Marc Muñoz
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:48 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote:
> > I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to
> > COPY an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
> > Not this:
> > /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
> >
> This should work, right?
> http://onetf
I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to
COPY an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
Not this:
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
This should work, right?
http://onetforum.com/fourm/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34
--
Dan Schaefer
Web Developer/Syste
Evan Platt a écrit :
> At 11:22 AM 7/16/2009, you wrote:
>> I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to
>> COPY an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
>> Not this:
>> /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
if you use amavisd-new, configure it to add a "
Quoting Dan Schaefer :
As that's really a postfix question, not a SpamAssassin question,
if you don't get an answer here you may want to try on a postfix
mailing list.
I know. Since everybody here is so great at answering my questions
so far, I thought I'd try this list first.
$> cat
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 11:22 AM 7/16/2009, you wrote:
>> I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to
>> COPY an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
>> Not this:
>> /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
>
> As that's really a postfix question, not a Spam
> I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone
> knew how to COPY an email marked as spam instead of
> redirecting.
> Not this:
> /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
Needs scripting. If the target spambox is on same server, a cp will do with
correct owner adjustmetnts i
As that's really a postfix question, not a SpamAssassin question, if
you don't get an answer here you may want to try on a postfix mailing
list.
I know. Since everybody here is so great at answering my questions so
far, I thought I'd try this list first.
--
Dan Schaefer
Web Developer/System
At 11:22 AM 7/16/2009, you wrote:
I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to
COPY an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
Not this:
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
As that's really a postfix question, not a SpamAssassin question, if
you don'
I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to COPY
an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
Not this:
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
--
Dan Schaefer
Web Developer/Systems Analyst
Performance Administration Corp.
The Doctor a écrit :
> Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
>
Post a sample to pastebin so that we see which one(s) make it to your
inbox.
if your server does not need to allow unauthenticated access to your
users, then you can configure your MTA to block such mail except from
authenticated
On Fri, December 26, 2008 13:48, The Doctor wrote:
> Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/postfix_restriction_classes3_en.shtml
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Merry Christmas 2008 NOT 2o8 and Happy New Year 2009 NOT 2o9
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
Tangaish.en wrote on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:22:45 +0800:
> I want use "rewrite_header To" rewrite the spam mail "rcpt to:" address
> to one accont named "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
This won't work because rewriting a header doesn't change where the mail
goes.
hi,everyone!
I want use "rewrite_header To" rewrite the spam mail "rcpt to:" address
to one accont named "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", I know there's private problem,
but the mail box is for business use only, the user ask
administrator(me) to pick up normal mail from
have MS Exchange Server 2003 on windows 2003 server. We have
installed Mail-spamassassin-3.1.7, Active Perl, GUI tool for SA, ESA.
We have mail ids with 30 users. Here spam mail has detected. How to
quaratine this mail Please help me
Fundamentally, quarantining mail must be a function of
Sg wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We have MS Exchange Server 2003 on windows 2003 server. We have
> installed Mail-spamassassin-3.1.7, Active Perl, GUI tool for SA, ESA.
>
> We have mail ids with 30 users. Here spam mail has detected. How to
> quaratine this mail Please help me
>
Hi
We have MS Exchange Server 2003 on windows 2003 server. We have installed
Mail-spamassassin-3.1.7, Active Perl, GUI tool for SA, ESA.
We have mail ids with 30 users. Here spam mail has detected. How to
quaratine this mail Please help me
Spam detection software, running on the system
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:29:19PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Jon Armitage wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the
> > > headers to the email and not change the email in any othe
Jon Armitage wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the
> > headers to the email and not change the email in any other
> > way.
>
> Look at the options for report_safe in your local.cf. I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the
> headers to the email and not change the email in any other
> way.
Look at the options for report_safe in your local.cf. I think this will do
what you wan
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 05:02:10PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 04:28 PM 2/18/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >hello
> >
> >i have been using spamassassin for ages and it has always defaulted to
> >saying an email is spam and attaching the original message to the report
> >from spamassassin.
> >
At 04:28 PM 2/18/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
i have been using spamassassin for ages and it has always defaulted to
saying an email is spam and attaching the original message to the report
from spamassassin.
I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the headers to the
email
hello
i have been using spamassassin for ages and it has always defaulted to
saying an email is spam and attaching the original message to the report
from spamassassin.
I was wondering if its possiable to make it just add the headers to the
email and not change the email in any other way, so if y
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Q: **other** good "general" Spam/Mail Admin Lists?
>
>
> RE: Questiona
RE: Questiona bout **other** good "general" Spam/Mail Admin Lists?
About a month or two ago, I recall someone posting advice to another SA list
member about *other* lists which would be good lists to post general spam
and/or e-mail server administration questions to whenever th
san wrote:
> Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
> ruleset which helps me??
>
As many others have said, an upgrade is definitely in order. A 2 year
old copy of spamassassin just can't keep up, no matter what rulesets you
add to it. A significant portion of
Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
ruleset which helps me??
YOu can't, and if at all possible you should upgrade so you can. There is
lots of new stuff that will help in quite a lot of cases.
That said, the SARE stock rules will help some, although poss
At 02:00 PM 12/1/2006, you wrote:
Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
ruleset which helps me??
Spamassassin was released (If my google is correct) 08-05-2004.
More than 2 years ago.
Time to upgrade.
is attached,
>
>
> The FuzzyOCR Plugin.
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spam-mail-tf2740694.html#a7647037
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
At 01:45 PM 12/1/2006, you wrote:
Hi,
How to stop this type of mail, am recieving too many mails which has got
.gif file which is attached,
The FuzzyOCR Plugin.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
a small strip appreciate of muslin--parthat of red roses fading in the
distance she said softly to herself:
http://www.nabble.com/file/4412/test.gif
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spam-mail-tf2740694.html#a7646828
Sent from the SpamAssassin - User
> > Matt Kettler comcast.net> writes:
> One way to achieve your desired goal would be to have SA tag the
> messages at the MTA level and then craft your delivery agent
> (EG procmail) to parse the SA headers and take action at
> delivery time to drop a message or route it to a spam-bin folder
> fo
On Tue, 9 May 2006, martin wrote:
> Matt Kettler comcast.net> writes:
> > >
> > SpamAssassin cannot be configured to drop mail at all.
> >
> > Based on how SA integrates into the mail chain it can only modify the
> > contents of the message. It has no ability to delete or alter message
> > delive
Matt Kettler comcast.net> writes:
> >
> SpamAssassin cannot be configured to drop mail at all.
>
> Based on how SA integrates into the mail chain it can only modify the
> contents of the message. It has no ability to delete or alter message
> delivery.
i understood this, so just want to ask
martin wrote:
> Dear all,
> spamd/spamc can had a user pref. file for user defined socring/white list
> etc,
> and using milter (spamass-milter) to control drop the spam mail or not.
> my question is, can drop the spam mail based on user pref. file? e.g. some
> user can deci
Dear all,
spamd/spamc can had a user pref. file for user defined socring/white list etc,
and using milter (spamass-milter) to control drop the spam mail or not.
my question is, can drop the spam mail based on user pref. file? e.g. some
user can decide to drop [marked] spam email, while other
What I did against this , is first, have a virtusertable that lists all
your users, and at the end has something like
@mydomain.edu.trerror: sorry no one by that name
(syntax may be off I am writing this from the top of my head)
so it rejects it outright before the mail has to go thru spamass
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:05:13 AM, Monty Ree wrote:
> > Hello, all.
>
> > When I see maillog, I can see lots of logs like below..
> > Some spammer send spam mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I
> > guess.
> > So mail server load is hig
>> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:05:13 AM, Monty Ree wrote:
>> >
>> >>Hello, all.
>> >
>> >
>> >>When I see maillog, I can see lots of logs like below..
>> >>Some spammer send spam mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>> >>I guess.
>> >>So mail server load i
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
