> 2010/1/14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>: > > well, you either trust SA on secondary MX - then don't run the mail through > > SA again.
On 14.01.10 23:58, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > But not all mails go through the 2nd MX ; so this is exactly what I > want to do: don't run SA if it went through the 2nd MX and was tagged > as spam. that's just what I said - don't run mail through SA _again_. Note that primary MX can score differently expecially if your users use BAYES, AWL etc. In suich case it may be desired to re-score. the best will be not to score in subject but only in X-Spam- headers that are replaced by SA. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist "So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton
