On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:41 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > > Your initial question was not "how to not run articular messages thru > > SA", but "How to score on existing spam headers". That's a different > > issue. > I wanted to mark as spam, mais already tagged spam . At the end of the > day, I achieve the same result.
Yes, you get the same result but you're wasting resources pointlessly. I already told you what to do with the headers. > > As I wrote before - the apropriate way to achieve what you need (save > > CPU time by bypassing the SA stage completely) depends on how you feed > > SA in your server setup. > > You must think of the way of filtering mail before feeding it into SA. > I use sendmail with spamass-milter. > > I don't believe spamass-milter can provide that level of flexibility.. It's not the matter of believing but checking the docs ;-) BTW, could you please just reply to the list? -- /\-\/\-\/\-\/\-\/\-\/\-\/\ \ k...@epsilon.eu.org / / http://epsilon.eu.org/ \ \/-/\/-/\/-/\/-/\/-/\/-/\/
