On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:28 -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> I guess I am still lost. SA appears to be working and everything looks
> fine however my emails don't appear to be getting a score and I don't
> understand how that link applies to why SA isn't setting a score on my
> messages when it is clearly passing mail to and from Postfix.
>
> My headers look like:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on mail.iamghost.com
> X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=6.3
> tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.0
The default SA headers.
> The above snipper shows no score as I would expect to see below from a
> different server:
>
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
> X-Spam-Score: -1.15
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5
> tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449] autolearn=no
Headers based on the SA analysis, but NOT added by SA but a third-party
glue application that itself calls SA. Amavisd in this case.
> Am I missing something in my local.cf that is not properly scoring all
> incoming messages?
You really are confused about the word "score", aren't you? Check both
headers again, and you'll notice they both clearly show a score. The
total score the message... scored. ;)
The latter, the Amavisd headers, *additionally* show each rule's score
in the tests section. Any chance that tiny, merely cosmetic difference
is what you are after? And perceive as "missing scores"?
If so, you can customize the SA headers (as added by SA), to look more
like the Avamisd ones. In particular, there are Template Tags showing
rules hit plus their respective scores...
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
