On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Darxus, any chance you can add this information to the warning notice?
+1 for thresholds and current corpora size in that notice.
And I don't think it's obnoxious because once we get things working
again, it should be non-existent!
Agreed.
--
>>> On 4/12/2012 at 4:30 PM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> On 4/12/2012 1:34 PM, joea wrote:
>>> "SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
>>>
>> > From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
> (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in o
On 4/12/2012 1:34 PM, joea wrote:
"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
> From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
(3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update?
Err, 3.3.0 was the first that included sa-update..
Darxus, any chance you can add this information to the warning notice?
And I don't think it's obnoxious because once we get things working
again, it should be non-existent!
I'm cc'ing Warren again but perhaps someone has a phone number for
Warren so we can call him and see if he'll green ligh
On 04/12, John Hardin wrote:
The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341.
Duh. I got those reversed... :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507
On 04/12, joea wrote:
> >"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
>
> From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
> (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update?
No, I thought it was overly verbose to say it actually say
>
>"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
>
>From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
>(3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update?
joe a.
On 04/12, John Hardin wrote:
> >Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
> >qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be significant? Or
> >is our deficit significantly larger than that?
> The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341.
>
> I don
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
against. Sorry, known issue.
Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
qualify another coup
On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
> against. Sorry, known issue.
Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be signi
Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
against. Sorry, known issue.
Regards,
KAM
joea wrote:
when running sa-update in debug, always end up with this:
channel: current version is 895075, new version is 895075, skipping channel
Are there no updates, or am I m
On 2011-08-24 22:32, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Axb wrote:
On 2011-08-24 16:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hello,
For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get
its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down.
Can someone contact the admin of the mirro
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:32 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Axb wrote:
> > Would any of the biggish hosters reading this list be willing to donate a
> > small VPS to add a couple of update mirrors and offload Daryl's boxes?
>
> Coral
>
> Granted a coralified reference to daryl.
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Axb wrote:
On 2011-08-24 16:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hello,
For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get
its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down.
Can someone contact the admin of the mirror or remove it from the mirror
list?
On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:27 AM, "Walter Hurry" wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:14:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>> Most certainly distro specific.
>
I saw the same behavior on Mandriva Enterprise server 5.2, so I do
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> The cron job:
> 10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a
> /var/log/sa-update.log
>
> The cron job script:
> /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron
>
Yep: I see exactly the same cron.d script in Fedora 13
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:53:25 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 16:26 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> I don't think so. Fedora does not create a cron job for sa-update.
>> Perhaps OP would be well advised to inspect the script run by cron. My
>> guess is that it is something ma
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:46:47 +0200, Axb wrote:
Would any of the biggish hosters reading this list be willing to
donate a small VPS to add a couple of update mirrors and offload
Daryl's boxes?
imho Daryl is not down becurse of bandwidth problems, but more mirrors
is still nice
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 16:26 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> I don't think so. Fedora does not create a cron job for sa-update.
> Perhaps OP would be well advised to inspect the script run by cron. My
> guess is that it is something made locally.
>
Fedora 13 and 15 do! I have copies of both runnin
Walter Hurry wrote:
I don't think so. Fedora does not create a cron job for sa-update.
Perhaps OP would be well advised to inspect the script run by cron. My
guess is that it is something made locally.
The cron job:
10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a
/var/log/
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:14:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> > Like a successful update from the second mirror, or any other
>> > non-stock channel?
>>
>> I'm thinking this is the case (second mirro
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Like a successful update from the second mirror, or any
> > other non-stock channel?
>
> I'm thinking this is the case (second mirror) but the log file does not
> clearly state that the bad mirror is ig
On 2011-08-24 16:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hello,
For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get
its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down.
Can someone contact the admin of the mirror or remove it from the mirror
list?
Mirror: daryl.dostech.ca
Would any
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Like a successful update from the second mirror, or any
other non-stock channel?
I'm thinking this is the case (second mirror) but the log file does not
clearly state that the bad mirror is ignored and it continues with a
good mirror for an update file.
To my eyes
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> What's disappointing is that when sa-update fails this is written to the
> log:
> http: GET http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/1160585.tar.gz request
> failed: 500 read timeout: 500 read timeout
> 24-Aug-2011 05:18:11: SpamAssassi
On 8/24/11 10:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
http://www.sa-update.pccc.com/ weight=5
question is... why didn't it pull from pccc.com?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Int
Michael Scheidell wrote:
sa-update doesn't pull a new one automatically?
Nope!
$ cat /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY
# test mirror: zone, cached via Coral
#http://buildbot.spamassassin.org.nyud.net:8090/updatestage/
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/ wei
On 8/24/11 10:37 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
if you are trying to update this by hand, you are on your own.
just use sa-update (-D to watch)
it will delete MIRRORED.BY for you, pull a new one, and use it.
I *am* using sa-update. sa-update is continuously failing.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
if you are trying to update this by hand, you are on your own.
just use sa-update (-D to watch)
it will delete MIRRORED.BY for you, pull a new one, and use it.
I *am* using sa-update. sa-update is continuously failing.
Fedora 14 box. I'm using the default cron job, w
On 8/24/11 10:27 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
remove self the mirrored.by file
Where is this file? I cannot find it.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2.
if you are trying to update this by hand, you are on your own.
just use sa-update (-D to watch)
it will delete MIRRORED
On 8/24/11 10:26 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
pccm mirror is back up again.
Huh?
$ wget daryl.dostech.ca
--2011-08-24 09:25:17-- http://daryl.dostech.ca/
Resolving daryl.dostech.ca... 71.164.246.108
Connecting to daryl.dostech.ca|71.164.246.108|:80...
(hangs fore
Benny Pedersen wrote:
remove self the mirrored.by file
Where is this file? I cannot find it.
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
pccm mirror is back up again.
Huh?
$ wget daryl.dostech.ca
--2011-08-24 09:25:17-- http://daryl.dostech.ca/
Resolving daryl.dostech.ca... 71.164.246.108
Connecting to daryl.dostech.ca|71.164.246.108|:80...
(hangs forever)
On 8/24/11 10:02 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hello,
For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get
its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down.
Can someone contact the admin of the mirror or remove it from the
mirror list?
Mirror: daryl.dostech.ca
pccm m
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:02:58 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Mirror: daryl.dostech.ca
remove self the mirrored.by file
i remember this helped before, maybe also this time ?, could be a bug
in update mirrored.by that can be staled with mirrors that are not
mirror anymore
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 11:37 -0500, Chris wrote:
> Does this have something to do with not being able to connect to
> Justin's site for sought updates?
Yes. And no. ;)
The server actually is available currently. The advertised rule-set
version isn't. Anyway, that's the reason for the exit code 4.
On 11/25/08, bernard rule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what do i need to do to change to a the new version? please let me know the
> commands
> will it change any configurations etc?
>
> Bernard Rule
> Technical Consultant
>
How are you integrating SA? At this time installing from
http://www.bac
what do i need to do to change to a the new version? please let me know the
commands
will it change any configurations etc?
* Bernard Rule
* Technical Consultant
* 3-Sixty NZ Limited*
Information Technology Specialists*
Project Management Software and IT Support
* www.teamworksPM.co.nz
On 23.11.08 15:46, bernier wrote:
> i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never
> been updated
upgrade the server, 3.0.3 was default afaik in sarge, which is obsolete and
unsupported. Is not possible, there was newer version in volatile and even
newer in volatile-slo
bernier wrote:
> hi
> i am not very technical so please help
>
> i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never
> been updated
>
> do i just use the cmd
>
> sa-update && service spamassassin restart
>
> what do i need to do?
>
No. sa-update only updates the ruleset.
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 15:46 -0800, bernier wrote:
> hi
> i am not very technical so please help
>
> i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never
> been updated
>
> do i just use the cmd
>
Use cron to do a periodic update. Here's my set-up:
I put a file called sa_up
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 15:46 -0800, bernier wrote:
> hi
> i am not very technical so please help
>
> i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never
> been updated
sa-update isn't available with 3.0.3, it has been added since 3.1.0.
> do i just use the cmd
>
> sa-updat
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 05:40:29PM +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
> So would it not make more sense to have the automatic update generation
> operate on the latest stable version?
Patches welcome. :)
ie: it's not a policy/etc decision to do this. the current automated
system doesn't have support f
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They're both done manually. 3.2 used to automatic, now it's 3.3 that's
> automatic. It follows the development tree.
Pardon me for saying so, but is that not backwards? People following the
development branch (which I have done in the past) normally
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:31:30AM -0400, Kevin Plested wrote:
> I'm using sa-update with SA 3.2.1. I think I was told on this list whe I was
> using 3.1.8 that updates weren't as frequent with the 3.1.8 version because
> they had to be done manually, but with 3.2.x they are more frequent due to
>
45 matches
Mail list logo