Re: updates

2012-04-13 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Darxus, any chance you can add this information to the warning notice? +1 for thresholds and current corpora size in that notice. And I don't think it's obnoxious because once we get things working again, it should be non-existent! Agreed. --

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread joea
>>> On 4/12/2012 at 4:30 PM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > On 4/12/2012 1:34 PM, joea wrote: >>> "SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25." >>> >> > From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions > (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in o

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/12/2012 1:34 PM, joea wrote: "SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25." > From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update? Err, 3.3.0 was the first that included sa-update..

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Darxus, any chance you can add this information to the warning notice? And I don't think it's obnoxious because once we get things working again, it should be non-existent! I'm cc'ing Warren again but perhaps someone has a phone number for Warren so we can call him and see if he'll green ligh

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread John Hardin
On 04/12, John Hardin wrote: The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341. Duh. I got those reversed... :) -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread darxus
On 04/12, joea wrote: > >"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25." > > From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions > (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update? No, I thought it was overly verbose to say it actually say

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread joea
> >"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25." > >From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions >(3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update? joe a.

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread darxus
On 04/12, John Hardin wrote: > >Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand > >qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be significant? Or > >is our deficit significantly larger than that? > The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341. > > I don

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Daniel McDonald wrote: On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules against. Sorry, known issue. Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand qualify another coup

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules > against. Sorry, known issue. Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be signi

Re: updates

2012-04-12 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules against. Sorry, known issue. Regards, KAM joea wrote: when running sa-update in debug, always end up with this: channel: current version is 895075, new version is 895075, skipping channel Are there no updates, or am I m

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Axb
On 2011-08-24 22:32, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Axb wrote: On 2011-08-24 16:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down. Can someone contact the admin of the mirro

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:32 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Axb wrote: > > Would any of the biggish hosters reading this list be willing to donate a > > small VPS to add a couple of update mirrors and offload Daryl's boxes? > > Coral > > Granted a coralified reference to daryl.

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Axb wrote: On 2011-08-24 16:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down. Can someone contact the admin of the mirror or remove it from the mirror list?

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:27 AM, "Walter Hurry" wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:14:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >> Most certainly distro specific. > I saw the same behavior on Mandriva Enterprise server 5.2, so I do

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > The cron job: > 10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a > /var/log/sa-update.log > > The cron job script: > /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron > Yep: I see exactly the same cron.d script in Fedora 13

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Walter Hurry
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:53:25 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 16:26 +, Walter Hurry wrote: > >> I don't think so. Fedora does not create a cron job for sa-update. >> Perhaps OP would be well advised to inspect the script run by cron. My >> guess is that it is something ma

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:46:47 +0200, Axb wrote: Would any of the biggish hosters reading this list be willing to donate a small VPS to add a couple of update mirrors and offload Daryl's boxes? imho Daryl is not down becurse of bandwidth problems, but more mirrors is still nice

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 16:26 +, Walter Hurry wrote: > I don't think so. Fedora does not create a cron job for sa-update. > Perhaps OP would be well advised to inspect the script run by cron. My > guess is that it is something made locally. > Fedora 13 and 15 do! I have copies of both runnin

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Walter Hurry wrote: I don't think so. Fedora does not create a cron job for sa-update. Perhaps OP would be well advised to inspect the script run by cron. My guess is that it is something made locally. The cron job: 10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a /var/log/

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Walter Hurry
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:14:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >> > Like a successful update from the second mirror, or any other >> > non-stock channel? >> >> I'm thinking this is the case (second mirro

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Like a successful update from the second mirror, or any > > other non-stock channel? > > I'm thinking this is the case (second mirror) but the log file does not > clearly state that the bad mirror is ig

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Axb
On 2011-08-24 16:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down. Can someone contact the admin of the mirror or remove it from the mirror list? Mirror: daryl.dostech.ca Would any

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Like a successful update from the second mirror, or any other non-stock channel? I'm thinking this is the case (second mirror) but the log file does not clearly state that the bad mirror is ignored and it continues with a good mirror for an update file. To my eyes

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:46 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > What's disappointing is that when sa-update fails this is written to the > log: > http: GET http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/1160585.tar.gz request > failed: 500 read timeout: 500 read timeout > 24-Aug-2011 05:18:11: SpamAssassi

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/24/11 10:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: http://www.sa-update.pccc.com/ weight=5 question is... why didn't it pull from pccc.com? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Int

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Michael Scheidell wrote: sa-update doesn't pull a new one automatically? Nope! $ cat /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY # test mirror: zone, cached via Coral #http://buildbot.spamassassin.org.nyud.net:8090/updatestage/ http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/ wei

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/24/11 10:37 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: if you are trying to update this by hand, you are on your own. just use sa-update (-D to watch) it will delete MIRRORED.BY for you, pull a new one, and use it. I *am* using sa-update. sa-update is continuously failing.

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Michael Scheidell wrote: if you are trying to update this by hand, you are on your own. just use sa-update (-D to watch) it will delete MIRRORED.BY for you, pull a new one, and use it. I *am* using sa-update. sa-update is continuously failing. Fedora 14 box. I'm using the default cron job, w

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/24/11 10:27 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Benny Pedersen wrote: remove self the mirrored.by file Where is this file? I cannot find it. I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2. if you are trying to update this by hand, you are on your own. just use sa-update (-D to watch) it will delete MIRRORED

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/24/11 10:26 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: pccm mirror is back up again. Huh? $ wget daryl.dostech.ca --2011-08-24 09:25:17-- http://daryl.dostech.ca/ Resolving daryl.dostech.ca... 71.164.246.108 Connecting to daryl.dostech.ca|71.164.246.108|:80... (hangs fore

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Benny Pedersen wrote: remove self the mirrored.by file Where is this file? I cannot find it. I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2.

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Michael Scheidell wrote: pccm mirror is back up again. Huh? $ wget daryl.dostech.ca --2011-08-24 09:25:17-- http://daryl.dostech.ca/ Resolving daryl.dostech.ca... 71.164.246.108 Connecting to daryl.dostech.ca|71.164.246.108|:80... (hangs forever)

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/24/11 10:02 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, For the past few days, my SpamAssassin instance has been trying to get its updates from one mirror and the mirror is down. Can someone contact the admin of the mirror or remove it from the mirror list? Mirror: daryl.dostech.ca pccm m

Re: updates mirror is down

2011-08-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:02:58 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Mirror: daryl.dostech.ca remove self the mirrored.by file i remember this helped before, maybe also this time ?, could be a bug in update mirrored.by that can be staled with mirrors that are not mirror anymore

Re: updates complete, exiting with code 4

2009-04-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 11:37 -0500, Chris wrote: > Does this have something to do with not being able to connect to > Justin's site for sought updates? Yes. And no. ;) The server actually is available currently. The advertised rule-set version isn't. Anyway, that's the reason for the exit code 4.

Re: updates

2008-11-27 Thread Gary V
On 11/25/08, bernard rule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what do i need to do to change to a the new version? please let me know the > commands > will it change any configurations etc? > > Bernard Rule > Technical Consultant > How are you integrating SA? At this time installing from http://www.bac

Re: updates

2008-11-25 Thread bernard rule
what do i need to do to change to a the new version? please let me know the commands will it change any configurations etc? * Bernard Rule * Technical Consultant * 3-Sixty NZ Limited* Information Technology Specialists* Project Management Software and IT Support * www.teamworksPM.co.nz

Re: updates

2008-11-24 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 23.11.08 15:46, bernier wrote: > i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never > been updated upgrade the server, 3.0.3 was default afaik in sarge, which is obsolete and unsupported. Is not possible, there was newer version in volatile and even newer in volatile-slo

Re: updates

2008-11-23 Thread Matt Kettler
bernier wrote: > hi > i am not very technical so please help > > i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never > been updated > > do i just use the cmd > > sa-update && service spamassassin restart > > what do i need to do? > No. sa-update only updates the ruleset.

Re: updates

2008-11-23 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 15:46 -0800, bernier wrote: > hi > i am not very technical so please help > > i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never > been updated > > do i just use the cmd > Use cron to do a periodic update. Here's my set-up: I put a file called sa_up

Re: updates

2008-11-23 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 15:46 -0800, bernier wrote: > hi > i am not very technical so please help > > i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never > been updated sa-update isn't available with 3.0.3, it has been added since 3.1.0. > do i just use the cmd > > sa-updat

Re: Updates ?

2007-08-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 05:40:29PM +0100, Graham Murray wrote: > So would it not make more sense to have the automatic update generation > operate on the latest stable version? Patches welcome. :) ie: it's not a policy/etc decision to do this. the current automated system doesn't have support f

Re: Updates ?

2007-08-08 Thread Graham Murray
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > They're both done manually. 3.2 used to automatic, now it's 3.3 that's > automatic. It follows the development tree. Pardon me for saying so, but is that not backwards? People following the development branch (which I have done in the past) normally

Re: Updates ?

2007-08-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:31:30AM -0400, Kevin Plested wrote: > I'm using sa-update with SA 3.2.1. I think I was told on this list whe I was > using 3.1.8 that updates weren't as frequent with the 3.1.8 version because > they had to be done manually, but with 3.2.x they are more frequent due to >