On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
against. Sorry, known issue.
Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be significant? Or
is our deficit significantly larger than that?
If you visit ruleqa.spamassassin.org and hover over a hit% in the Ham
column it will tell you the size of the corpus; same for spam.
The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341.
I don't remember what the thresholds currently are, but the numbers used
in the past have been a multiple of 50k, so 100k, 150k, 200k or 250k.
Darxus, you're more in tune with this than I am, what are the current
thresholds?
We probably need at least 50k more ham for ruleqa to start pushing rule
updates again. Of course, the more the better.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...to announce there must be no criticism of the President or to
stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and
servile, but is morally treasonous to the American public.
-- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Thomas Jefferson's 269th Birthday
