On 2025-02-16 at 10:38:38 UTC-0500 (Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:38:38 -0500)
Alex
is rumored to have said:
[quoting me]
TxRep (like AWL) is fed not by Bayes learning (sa-learn) but rather
it
tracks the combination of an address and a source IP range (/24) with
a
tally of the SA scores of messages usi
>
>
>
> > Is there any benefit to training an email that's already hitting
> > bayes99?
>
> Yes. The tokens which made it hit 99% are already doing their jobs, but
> the rest of the message that Bayes isn't seeing as spammy may turn out
> to be what makes the next spam hit 99.9%
>
I have noticed t
On 2025-02-14 at 17:00:03 UTC-0500 (Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:00:03 -0500)
Alex
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
I'm using SA v4 and trying to find ways to minimize the amount of junk
that
isn't tagged. Emails like "1-hour free consultation" or "buy this
event
list" or "salesforce optimization" or "HR
Alex writes:
> These also aren't always one-offs, but maybe a dozen or twenty of each over
> a short period that get through, likely before the URIs are blocked through
> other means. Other times they don't have a link at all.
Sounds like fairly aggressive greylisting is in order.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SA v4 and trying to find ways to minimize the amount of junk that
isn't tagged. Emails like "1-hour free consultation" or "buy this event
list" or "salesforce optimization" or "HR consulting" that already hit
bayes99 (and bayes999) but are still jus
day differenc now :)
Regards,Gregor
From: hg user
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:58
To: Grega
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Yes
Il Mar 12 Nov 2024, 13:53 Grega via users
mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
> As documented:
>
> # perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
> NAME
> Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL - SQL Bayesian Storage Module
> Implementation
>
> DESCRIPTION
> This module implements a SQL based bayesian storage module. It's
> compatible with SQLite and possibly other standard SQ
Yes
Il Mar 12 Nov 2024, 13:53 Grega via users
ha scritto:
> If we used SQL and now switched to MySQL do we have to re-train bayes?
>
> --
> *From:* Bill Cole
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:35
> *To:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subj
If we used SQL and now switched to MySQL do we have to re-train bayes?
From: Bill Cole
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2024 13:35
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On 2024-11-12 at 00:33:13 UTC-0500 (Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:33:13
On 2024-11-12 at 00:33:13 UTC-0500 (Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:33:13 -0500)
Shawn Iverson
is rumored to have said:
[...]
> The "-D bayes" parameter was quite informative. Thank you. Turns out the
> database wasn't being read properly with the bayes_store_module in use.
> Maybe it has something to do wit
: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Grega
Cc: hg user
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 4:48 PM hg user
mailto:mercurialu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In spamassassin 3 you could debug bayes points running command line
spamassassin with "-D bayes" parameter. I
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 4:48 PM hg user wrote:
> In spamassassin 3 you could debug bayes points running command line
> spamassassin with "-D bayes" parameter. I think you can in version 4 too.
>
> In the log all the tokens extracted from the message are listed with the
> points assigned, so you c
values like BAYES_05 and
>BAYES_99 ?
>
>
> Thanks for listening and any input 😊
>
> Regards,G
>
> --
> *From:* Grega via users
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 September 2024 20:02
> *To:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Baye
via users
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 20:02
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Oh god I`m idiot...
I had:
score BAYES_20 0.0
So now every mail has bayes score in it (changed it to score BAYES_20 0.1)
Still puzzling why I have no extreme low or
off.
From: Matija Nalis
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 18:23
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not?
&
Hi.
Im on mysql backend.
Load is none ..
From: Matija Nalis
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 18:24
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 08:10:38AM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Also this:
>
> RuleDescriptionScoreTotalHamCol6SpamCol8
> BAYES_40Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%0.002,784
> 2,72197.7632.3
> BAYES_50Bayes spam probability is 40 to 6
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +, Grega via users wrote:
> Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not?
>
> 4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder)
What backend are you using for storing bayer data?
I'm not yet on 4.x (Debian Stable FTW), but in SA 3.x default was a
local file storage (BDB?
via users
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2024 15:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Hi again.
In V4 there is something wrong with bayes...
I received 3 identical mails (1 external sender, 3 internal recipients) and
scores are like this:
2 X like
es to skip some?
4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder)
5. Bayes behaves non consistent on BOTH installs I have it on
From: John Hardin
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 20:38
To: SpamAssassin-Users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024,
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024, Bill Cole wrote:
Please send any replies to the list only.
...or to Harald only.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C
Grega via users skrev den 2024-09-13 16:16:
Sorry guys if I replied to all, my intentions were not to spam :)
top posters :)
imho not impossible to request 3dr party list archives to make a
password for users, never mind
eggs came before chickens :=)
Sorry guys if I replied to all, my intentions were not to spam :)
From: Benny Pedersen
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 15:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
> Please send
On 2024-09-13 at 09:13:58 UTC-0400 (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:13:58 +0200)
Benny Pedersen
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
Please send any replies to the list only.
unsubscribe listarchivers ?
and make archived on apache.org with bugzilla login
don't know if it wil
On Friday 13 September 2024 at 15:13:58, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
> > Please send any replies to the list only.
>
> unsubscribe listarchivers ?
> and make archived on apache.org with bugzilla login
> don't know if it will help or not, but chicken and egg
I do
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-09-13 15:03:
Please send any replies to the list only.
unsubscribe listarchivers ?
and make archived on apache.org with bugzilla login
don't know if it will help or not, but chicken and egg
9-13 at 05:00:17 UTC-0400 (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:00:17 +)
Grega
is rumored to have said:
Do you have V3 or V4 SA?
From: Reindl Harald (privat)
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 10:57
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Do you have V3 or V4 SA?
From: Reindl Harald (privat)
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 10:57
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
autolearn was always a blackbox
that below are the stats for the current month and that
September 2024 10:22
To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
Am 13.09.24 um 06:53 schrieb Grega via users:
> And I`m reconfiguring autolearn to -4 for HAM and 12 for SPAM to really
> auto-train on correct mails...
this is even more nonsense than autolearn
September 2024 21:38
To: Grega via users
Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3
On 2024-09-12 at 14:05:11 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:05:11 +)
Grega via users
is rumored to have said:
Hi.
I have SA 4.0.1 configured it, all is good, except for bayes. It IS working, it
IS learning b
On 2024-09-12 at 14:05:11 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:05:11 +)
Grega via users
is rumored to have said:
Hi.
I have SA 4.0.1 configured it, all is good, except for bayes. It IS
working, it IS learning but when it classifies mail it is really not
so decisive as it was in V3.
I have:
db
On 2024-01-31 at 08:16:13 UTC-0500 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:16:13 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, alt
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, although I have
disabled nearly all rules with negative scores, like
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
RCVD_IN_IADB_* DKIMWL_WL_*
RCVD_IN_
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, although I have
disabled nearly all rules with negative scores, like
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
RCVD_IN_IADB_* DKIMWL_WL_*
RCVD_IN_
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back
to 2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
On 1/30/2024 10:58:52, Matus U
On 1/30/2024 10:58:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too ol
On 2024-01-30 at 09:59:52 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:59:52 -0500)
joe a
is rumored to have said:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
Yes. That is why it has an expiration model. Expiration may be de facto
blocked on some busy systems so you may need to explicitly force it
occas
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
I did retrain on old spam a fe
This is what I believe: the words need to be trimmed or separated, and
careful consideration is required to determine the language in order to
perform accurate cutoffs.
Jimmy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 5:16 PM wrote:
> "ทุก" is not considered a word because it's part of the token
> "ทุกวันพุธเล่นช
"ทุก" is not considered a word because it's part of the token
"ทุกวันพุธเล่นชนะรับเพิ่ม".
Words must be separated by spaces, otherwise we should skip the word "theme" just because
"the" is in english stopword list.
No idea if this makes sense for asian languages.
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 11:04, J
The sample email and word list should contain at least these words.
ถูก
เลย
ทุก
Jimmy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:47 PM wrote:
> I do not speak Thai but I cannot see any word in the sample email that
> should match that list.
> Which word do you think should match the regexp ?
> Giovanni
>
> O
I do not speak Thai but I cannot see any word in the sample email that should
match that list.
Which word do you think should match the regexp ?
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 10:08, Jimmy wrote:
You can use this word list
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stopwords-iso/stopwords-th/master/stopwords-th
You can use this word list
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stopwords-iso/stopwords-th/master/stopwords-th.txt
Jimmy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:59 PM wrote:
> To create the stopwords regexp I used the script I shared in a previous
> email and a list of words one per line.
> Could you share the
To create the stopwords regexp I used the script I shared in a previous email
and a list of words one per line.
Could you share the list you are using ?
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
$ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
Dec 29 15:17:56
I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
$ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=en
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=th
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=ru
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420]
Config line produces a syntax error for me:
config: failed to parse line in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (line 1):
bayes_stopword_th
Could you share the word list in utf8 ?
I tried adding "บาท" to
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stopwords-iso/stopwords-th/master/stopwords-th.txt and
it pr
bayes_stopword_th https://pastebin.pl/view/0838138d
Sample mail https://pastebin.pl/view/e5a2c5b8
Jimmy
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 10:59 PM wrote:
> Could you share a config line and a sample you are using ?
> Giovanni
>
> On 12/28/23 16:26, Jimmy wrote:
> > Yes, I have done that, and I am also
Could you share a config line and a sample you are using ?
Giovanni
On 12/28/23 16:26, Jimmy wrote:
Yes, I have done that, and I am also editing Plugin/Bayes.pm to investigate why
it is not being skipped. I suspect that if words are not separated by spaces,
longer words may not match those pa
Yes, I have done that, and I am also editing Plugin/Bayes.pm to investigate
why it is not being skipped. I suspect that if words are not separated by
spaces, longer words may not match those patterns.
Jimmy
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 10:13 PM wrote:
> "spamassassin -D bayes" will tell you, you sho
"spamassassin -D bayes" will tell you, you should see a line like:
bayes: skipped token 'from' because it's in stopword list for language 'en'
Giovanni
On 12/28/23 15:45, Jimmy wrote:
The pattern has successfully passed the test script, but it needs to check
whether Bayes learning will identi
The pattern has successfully passed the test script, but it needs to check
whether Bayes learning will identify and possibly exclude the word from
matching this pattern.
Thank you.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 9:22 PM wrote:
> On 12/28/23 12:59, Jimmy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm seeking assistance i
On 12/28/23 12:59, Jimmy wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeking assistance in incorporating a stopword for Asian languages in
Unicode. Although I possess comprehensive word lists, my attempts to generate a
regex pattern and test it have been unsuccessful; the pattern fails to match or
skips tokens in the new
> From: Pierluigi Frullani
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:49:24 +0100
>
> Hello all,
> I'm facing a strange problem.
...
> tests=BAYES_95,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_HEADERS,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
How did you feed this message into SpamAssassin?
Did you do something to strip of
On 2023-12-13 at 01:49:24 UTC-0500 (Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:49:24 +0100)
Pierluigi Frullani
is rumored to have said:
Hello all,
I'm facing a strange problem.
Not really. MANY people run into this issue...
I've feed the bayes db for a while and now I would like to put it in
use
but all message
joe a skrev den 2023-02-28 17:37:
Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
Noted in a header this morning:
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.2 BAYES_999
From: "Bill Cole"
It is my understanding that an automated rescoring job was run quite some
time ago (before I was on the PMC) to generate the Bayes scores, which
determined that to be the best supplemental score to give to the greater
certainty.
I was around in those days. My memory isn't
joe a skrev den 2023-02-28 17:37:
Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
Noted in a header this morning:
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.2 BAYES_999
On 2023-02-28 at 13:38:35 UTC-0500 (Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:38:35 -0500)
joe a
is rumored to have said:
On 2/28/2023 12:05 PM, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> From: joe a
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:37:34 -0500
>
> Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they
are.
> I'd expect
>From my small experience... I score BAYES_999 with 2.00, it was
suggested to me months ago.
But nowadays I'd be more careful and do some more testing: I'd check which
messages have only BAYES_99 and which have BAYES_999, If you are
absolutely certain that BYES_999 are only and definitively spam,
On 2/28/2023 12:05 PM, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> From: joe a
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:37:34 -0500
>
> Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
> I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
>
> Noted in a header this morning:
>
> * 3.5
> From: joe a
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:37:34 -0500
>
> Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
> I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
>
> Noted in a header this morning:
>
> * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 1
Heh, I know this thread is so old it might as well be dead, but this does work. Note that you may
need to apply the patch from Bug 7932 until the next release.
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
bayes_sql_dsn DBI:SQLite:/path/to/bayes.sqlite
On 5/26/22 9:25 AM, Michael Grant
On Mon, 10 May 2021 20:39:31 +0200
Bert Van de Poel wrote:
> Based on what I've read, I agree that this is indeed a bug (or
> actually several). I've filed the following bug reports:
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7904 (missing body
> types, as mentioned by RW)
> https://bz
Dear Loren,
Thank you very much for your email. Based on your message I could deduce
there were earlier messages (which I then read through a web archive).
For some unexplained reason I never received the previous 3 responses to
my email. I hope the university network isn't randomly over-filte
so you don't have points from body rules.
your mentioned URI_DEOBFU_INSTR is a meta rule:
meta URI_DEOBFU_INSTR __URI_DEOBFU_INSTR && !__MSGID_OK_HOST
so maybe it's not considered.
They are treated as header, or ignored if marked as net.
I think a bug report should be submitted for this.
E
On Sun, 9 May 2021 20:03:27 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> so you don't have points from body rules.
>
> your mentioned URI_DEOBFU_INSTR is a meta rule:
>
> meta URI_DEOBFU_INSTR __URI_DEOBFU_INSTR && !__MSGID_OK_HOST
>
> so maybe it's not considered.
They are treated as header, or ign
On 09.05.21 04:17, Bert Van de Poel wrote:
Dear fellow Spamassassin users,
I recently noticed that quite a lot of spam emails with high scores
weren't marked for Bayes autolearning. While some senders and
receivers were a common match, explaining why autolearn was nog, there
was no clear expl
On Sun, 9 May 2021 04:17:26 +0200
Bert Van de Poel wrote:
> Within the same realm, I'm also wondering whether these expected
> numbers for body and header can be tweaked and if so, how.
You can create a meta-rule for definite spam and set:
tflags autolearn_force
a hit on any rule with th
On 2/4/2021 5:32 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 2/4/21 10:47 AM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
Hey there all,
In looking at my sql server, it looks like the on-disk size of my MySQL DB's is
like 9G (because of InnoDB, it's hard to glean just from the filesystem what
tables are which).
Anyway,
On 2/4/21 10:47 AM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
> Hey there all,
>
> In looking at my sql server, it looks like the on-disk size of my MySQL DB's
> is like 9G (because of InnoDB, it's hard to glean just from the filesystem
> what tables are which).
>
> Anyway, I'd like to move over to a global r
Alex skrev den 2020-11-30 17:33:
2020-11-30 10:11:46 2772099 [Note] InnoDB: *** (2) WAITING FOR THIS
LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
have you tryed do the bayes with AriaDB ?
note i am not expert at all
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:46:00 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, RW wrote:
>
> > I was looking at it in a bit more detail and it looks like there
> > isn't a reader-writer lock, just write locks for the toks and seen
> > files. As scans defer their writes through the journal t
On Friday, February 14, 2020, 7:46:18 PM GMT+1, John Hardin
wrote:
>> I was looking at it in a bit more detail and it looks like there isn't
>> a reader-writer lock, just write locks for the toks and seen
>> files. As scans defer their writes through the journal they are
>> lockless.
>S
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, RW wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:38:05 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
On Friday, February 14, 2020, 1:17:29 PM GMT+1, RW
wrote: That would defeat the object of
having a journal file.>>Even if you are right, it doesn't really
explain anything because it>applies to ev
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:38:05 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
>
>
> >On Friday, February 14, 2020, 1:17:29 PM GMT+1, RW
> > wrote: That would defeat the object of
> >having a journal file.>>Even if you are right, it doesn't really
> >explain anything because it>applies to everyone using BD
>On Friday, February 14, 2020, 1:17:29 PM GMT+1, RW
> wrote:
>That would defeat the object of having a journal file.>>Even if you are right,
>it doesn't really explain anything because it>applies to everyone using
>BDB/DBM/SDBM. >>IIWY I'd be looking at what's different for you.
I basically
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:29:46 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
>
>>On 13.02.20 12:30, RW wrote:
> >>Bayes doesn't write on scans (unless it does an opportunistic sync
> >>or
> >expiry):
> >
> >doesn't it record token access times to journal?
>
> i think SA always does an EXclusive
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:05:57 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:03:01 + (UTC)
> >Pedro David Marco wrote:
> >> i am getting errors from Byes because it is not able to lock Bayes
> >> files... Error log is:
> >> bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> >> /etc/spama
>On 13.02.20 12:30, RW wrote:
>>Bayes doesn't write on scans (unless it does an opportunistic sync or
>expiry):
>
>doesn't it record token access times to journal?
i think SA always does an EXclusive lock despite the parameters, probably
because of that, Fantomas
I will try with SDBM...
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:03:01 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
i am getting errors from Byes because it is not able to lock Bayes
files... Error log is:
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /etc/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
SA tries to lock bayes fi
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:03:01 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Hi..
> i am getting errors from Byes because it is not able to lock Bayes
> files... Error log is:
> bayes: cannot open bayes databases /etc/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_*
> R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
>
>
> SA tr
On 12.02.20 19:02, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Fully aligned with my suspicions...
I love Redis... i think someone posted sometime ago a performance table
showing local / sql / redis ... i will look for it...
but it would not surprise me if remote Redis is even faster than local DB...
On 13.02.
On 12.02.20 19:02, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Fully aligned with my suspicions...
I love Redis... i think someone posted sometime ago a performance table
showing local / sql / redis ... i will look for it...
but it would not surprise me if remote Redis is even faster than local DB...
last time
On 2020-02-13 04:11, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Hi..
i am getting errors from Byes because it is not able to lock Bayes
files...
Error log is:
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /etc/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Hi..
i am getting errors from Byes because it is not able to lock Bayes files...
Error log is:
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /etc/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: Interrupted system call
SA tries to lock bayes files always in
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-02-12 23:14:
I don't know for sure but Alex Broens aka axb is a master at Bayes
with Redis. Definitely look for his postings.
lets see sqlite with DBI: supported in spamassassin
i am happy with postgresql
I don't know for sure but Alex Broens aka axb is a master at Bayes with
Redis. Definitely look for his postings.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:02 PM P
Fully aligned with my suspicions...
I love Redis... i think someone posted sometime ago a performance table
showing local / sql / redis ... i will look for it...
but it would not surprise me if remote Redis is even faster than local DB...
Thanks! Ďakujem mnohokrát Fantomas!
Pedro.
On Wedne
On 12.02.20 18:03, Pedro David Marco wrote:
i am getting errors from Byes because it is not able to lock Bayes files...
Error log is:
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /etc/spamassassin/bayes/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: Interrupted system call
SA tries to lock bayes files always in "EXclus
Zitat von Benny Pedersen :
i came after using it this way for long time now that it could be
more optimized with bayes user id vars, currently it creates new ids
each time there is a new user, but it does not reuse old ids that is
not used anymore after sa-learn --username f...@example.org,
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:31:10 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i came after using it this way for long time now that it could be
> more optimized with bayes user id vars, currently it creates new ids
> each time there is a new user, but it does not reuse old ids that is
> not used anymore after sa-lea
Can I bump this one to the top again? I had great bayes reports in
every email for 30 minutes. Then nothing for the last three days, even
after restarting SA. Is it possible that my bayes db got corrupted?
The sa-learn --dump magic looks ok as far as I can tell.
Thanks for any suggestions.
This is getting stranger by the minute... After playing around and
verifying permissions and everything, I actually started getting a bayes
score item for each email. So I celebrated and went to dinner. Came
back a few hours later and checked the logs. Bayes consistently added a
score line t
On 11/25/2019 3:02 PM, Mikael Syska wrote:
Try and run:
sa-learn --dump magic
Should give you some information like:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 493422 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 3867414 0 non-
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 22:02:03 +0100
Mikael Syska wrote:
> Try and run:
>
> sa-learn --dump magic
That needs to be run as the spamd user (using su or otherwise) for db
files.
Try and run:
sa-learn --dump magic
Should give you some information like:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 493422 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 3867414 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:35:16 -0600
Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks again to everyone who helped me get everything up and running
> over the past couple of days.
>
> Now that I have SA finding my bayes database, I'm curious about bayes
> reporting. My bayes db is not new. I migrated my previous
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Dec 6, 2018, at 12:14 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Runaway backtracking that was killing masscheck for several people.
Hrm, that is disconcerting. I'm not sure where any backtracking might be
occurring...
This sort of thing is risky, especially in a ra
On Dec 6, 2018, at 12:14 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> Runaway backtracking that was killing masscheck for several people.
Hrm, that is disconcerting. I'm not sure where any backtracking might be
occurring...
Can anyone help improve this suggested rule?
rawbody AC_HTML_ENTITY_BONANZA_NEW
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Dec 1, 2018, at 10:31 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Amir Caspi wrote:
A) Could you sandbox the proposed rule change (AC_HTML_ENTITY_BONANZA_NEW) and
see how it performs, including possible FPs?
Done.
Any preliminary results?
Run
1 - 100 of 1737 matches
Mail list logo
