This strategy worked really great in V3 and bayes was excellent even with autotrain and ocasionally manual training.
Now it`s non decisive and useless at least for me. We have around 5k-7k daily mails... ________________________________ From: Reindl Harald (privat) <ha...@rhsoft.net> Sent: Friday, 13 September 2024 10:22 To: Grega; Bill Cole; Grega via users Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Am 13.09.24 um 06:53 schrieb Grega via users: > And I`m reconfiguring autolearn to -4 for HAM and 12 for SPAM to really > auto-train on correct mails... this is even more nonsense than autolearn itself what you really want to train are wrong classified messages and decision can only be made by an human if you train wrong classified mails in both directions you amplify the incorrect result it happens that HAM MAILS have a score above 12 from time to time because of blacklists and over-aggressive rules and when you then atolearn the content as spam your bayes will result in what it is now
