Hi all.
I`m posting this here as well. Now I sorted out this score and disabled rules thing, but I still have bayes issues even after I re-trained the whole thing by hand AND disabled autolearn. Here is post: https://forum.efa-project.org/viewtopic.php?p=20226#p20226 I just don`t get 2 things: 1. Why same mail with different recipient is treated different by SA bayes? (one has bayes added other not) 2. Why my bayes scoring is missing extreme values like BAYES_05 and BAYES_99 ? Thanks for listening and any input 😊 Regards,G ________________________________ From: Grega via users <users@spamassassin.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 20:02 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Oh god I`m idiot... I had: score BAYES_20 0.0 So now every mail has bayes score in it (changed it to score BAYES_20 0.1) Still puzzling why I have no extreme low or extreme high values. Also still puzzling why out of 3 identical mails one had bayes_60 and other 2 bayes_20. Autolearn is off. ________________________________ From: Matija Nalis <mnalis-sa-l...@voyager.hr> Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 18:23 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:14:25PM +0000, Grega via users wrote: > Why one has "BAYES_60" and other 2 not? > > 4. Race condition (IDK I`m not coder) What backend are you using for storing bayer data? I'm not yet on 4.x (Debian Stable FTW), but in SA 3.x default was a local file storage (BDB?) which used file locking, and that locking was prone to timing out when several mails came in quick succession. For me, switching to MySQL backend for Bayes (and AWL) fixed such issues... -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.
