> From: joe a <joea-li...@j4computers.com> > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:37:34 -0500 > > Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are. > I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY. > > Noted in a header this morning: > > * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% > * [score: 1.0000] > * 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% > * [score: 1.0000] > > Was this discussed recently? I added a local score to mollify my sense > of propriety.
Those two rules overlap. A message with bayes >= 99.9% hits both rules. BAYES_99 ends at 1.00 not .999. -jeff
