Re: razor?

2018-03-10 Thread RW
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:39:20 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>>For example those scores were for a totally legit email that had > >>>some screenshots embedded in the email... > > some screenshots? afaik razor only work on text parts, so short mail > is quite possible to be detected (as

Re: razor?

2018-03-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300 Robert Boyl wrote: Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor? razor is great at spam detection. It says on their site " Detection is done with statistical and randomized signatures that efficiently spot mutating spam content. " For example those scores we

Re: razor?

2018-03-09 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2018-03-09 09:26, David Jones wrote: > RAZOR like DCC and PYZOR shouldn't be used as a sole source of > determining spam. These are indicators that combine with other rule > hits and scores to be one of many factors. If the score was 10 or > more then you would worry about reporting FPs. Wel

Re: razor?

2018-03-09 Thread David Jones
On 03/09/2018 08:58 AM, RW wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300 Robert Boyl wrote: Hi, everyone Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor? Havent analysed big amount of emails yet, but Ive had a few cases where it causes very strange false positives that make no sense. and adds a lot

Re: razor?

2018-03-09 Thread RW
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300 Robert Boyl wrote: > Hi, everyone > > Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor? > > Havent analysed big amount of emails yet, but Ive had a few cases > where it causes very strange false positives that make no sense. > > and adds a lot of points... > > RAZ

Re: Razor FP on simple http link (by itself)

2017-05-05 Thread RW
On Fri, 5 May 2017 11:37:38 -0400 Rob McEwen wrote: > Does RAZOR extract domains from links and checks them against a bad > domain database... sort of how SURBL works... and/or check the IP > that they resolve to? (I don't think so, but now I have to ask just > to be sure!) > > If not... this s

Re: razor default in SA 3.3.1?

2010-03-25 Thread Charles Gregory
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote: (you using the freebsd SA port?) CentOS 4 (RHEL 4) rpm from rpmforge - C

Re: razor default in SA 3.3.1?

2010-03-25 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 3/25/10 12:08 PM, Charles Gregory wrote: Hallo! Follow-up on SA 3.3.1 upgrade yesterday My system changes log reported the addition of several files named .razor/... which brought to my attentino that 'RAZOR2' tests are now enabled by default in SA 3.3.1 A long time ago, in a gal

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Michael Scheidell
Patrick Proniewski wrote: Hi all, No idea on this one? I run: # su vscan -c 'spamassassin -r < /tmp/spam' did you register with razor? error message is pretty clear: "report requires authentication" su - vscan -c "/usr/local/bin/razor-admin -create; wait;\ /usr/local/bin/razor-admi

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Patrick Proniewski
On 04 sept. 2009, at 11:49, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: I have IMAP folders as "to be reported SPAM" and "Reported SPAM". A cronjob reads every mail on the first and reports it, then moves the file to to the latter. I use instead the amavis' quarantine folder, reporting viruses and spam above

RE: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Original Message- > From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk] > Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:02 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: razor/spamcop report question > > > > Reporting can't be automatic,

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > Reporting can't be automatic, as there will be or may be false > > positives. As well as false negatives. On 04.09.09 11:49, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > Razor, DCC, maybe IxHash and surely others do state in their policies that > automatic reporting is forbidden. DCC? DCC is based on automat

RE: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Reporting can't be automatic, as there will be or may be false > positives. As well as false negatives. Razor, DCC, maybe IxHash and surely others do state in their policies that automatic reporting is forbidden. SpamCop, however, doesn't. This is probably because of the very nature of the Spam

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> On 04 sept. 2009, at 09:48, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > And I only get an email like this one when I'm running `su vscan -c 'spamassassin -r < /tmp/spam'`. During normal operations, I don't get any email from Spamcop asking me to finish a spam report. >> >> Define "normal oper

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Patrick Proniewski
On 04 sept. 2009, at 09:48, Jari Fredriksson wrote: And I only get an email like this one when I'm running `su vscan -c 'spamassassin -r < /tmp/spam'`. During normal operations, I don't get any email from Spamcop asking me to finish a spam report. Define "normal operations". Do you have a cron

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-04 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> Hi all, > > No idea on this one? > > On 27 août 2009, at 21:18, Patrick Proniewski wrote: > >> -> spamcop send me an email : >> >>> SpamCop is now ready to process your spam. >>> >>> Use links to finish spam reporting (members use >>> cookie-login please!): >>> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=

Re: razor/spamcop report question

2009-09-03 Thread Patrick Proniewski
Hi all, No idea on this one? On 27 août 2009, at 21:18, Patrick Proniewski wrote: Hello, I'm using the amavisd-new/spamassassin 3.2.5/clamav combo on some servers (Freebsd, Mac OS X Server). I would like spamassassin to report spam using razor and spamcop services. in /usr/local/etc/mai

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-02 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
I'm starting to seriously wonder, what your homework actually is about. On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 13:05 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: > Your command works! I found in spamassassin -D razor2 < sample.msg 2>&1 | > less message the following: > check[9444]: [ 6] a=c&e=4&ep4=7542-10&s=4uO_brp

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-02 Thread monolit
Your command works! I found in spamassassin -D razor2 < sample.msg 2>&1 | less message the following: check[9444]: [ 6] a=c&e=4&ep4=7542-10&s=4uO_brp3_KWEDuqMYXBVHI-4-FwA But I dont know how to recognize that is a signature(hash) of the mail. In the old version it was clearly marked for example

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-02 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0700, monolit wrote: > I understand that I must read whole output(message(TOP message)). But the > output this command is very fast and it stop at the end. I dont catch TOP of > message. I tried "| more" switch but it didint help. I tried redirecting > output to the fil

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-02 Thread monolit
I understand that I must read whole output(message(TOP message)). But the output this command is very fast and it stop at the end. I dont catch TOP of message. I tried "| more" switch but it didint help. I tried redirecting output to the file but it doesnt work. The file was empty:( I dont know ho

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-02 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Getting kind of a headache, trying to wrap my head around this confusing mess. Anyway, here's my shot at this. On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 03:31 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: > > > When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 < /tmp/spam > > > so I dont get the hash and so on but content analysis > > >

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-02 Thread monolit
I am really sorry it was mistake - I was yesterday very tired. Back on-list. I'm not a personal help-line. When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 < /tmp/spam so I dont get the hash and so on but content analysis > > details...bayes clasification and so on. I expected message like debug: Razor i

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-01 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Back on-list. I'm not a personal help-line. On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 16:40 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote privately: > I tried it without --lint just "spamassassin --lint -D razor2" so the ^^^^ You did not. > command line freeze(dont work). O

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-01 Thread monolit
I tried it without --lint just "spamassassin --lint -D razor2" so the command line freeze(dont work). > When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 < /tmp/spam > so I dont get the hash and so on but content analysis details...bayes > clasification and so on. I expected message like : debug: Razor is a

Re: Razor, spamassassin - network test

2009-08-01 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 16:10 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: > Hi I need help with antispam. I use spamassassin with razor. And when I test > spamassassin --lint -D razor2 then I get result that razor2 : test local > only, skipping razor. I need test razor in connection to the internet. I > d

RE: Razor agents sdk woes

2009-04-01 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com] Sent: woensdag 1 april 2009 18:03 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Razor agents sdk woes > > Wanting to update my Razor, too -- as I'm doing an overall > > spamassassin update -- I just

RE: Razor agents sdk woes

2009-04-01 Thread Bowie Bailey
Mark wrote: > Wanting to update my Razor, too -- as I'm doing an overall > spamassassin update -- I just downloaded razor-agents-sdk-2.07 > (needed) from sourceforge.. It seems this install overwrites > existing, newer packages, like Digest::SHA, with older versions! What > gives? Pretty annoying,

Re: Razor timeout

2008-05-29 Thread Sébastien AVELINE
Lukas Garberg a écrit : Sébastien AVELINE wrote: Hello, Did anyone experience razor timeout today ? I saw my spools grew and grew up, and saw that spamassassin took very long time to check messages. I tried to disable plugin after plugin and saw that the problem came from razor. Any feedbac

Re: Razor timeout

2008-05-29 Thread Lukas Garberg
Sébastien AVELINE wrote: Hello, Did anyone experience razor timeout today ? I saw my spools grew and grew up, and saw that spamassassin took very long time to check messages. I tried to disable plugin after plugin and saw that the problem came from razor. Any feedback would be appreciate. Ta

Re: Razor suddenly throwing errors.

2008-05-22 Thread Chris
On Thursday 22 May 2008 5:08 pm, James Lay wrote: > Anyone have any ideas? Just started cropping up a few ago. > > James > > > May 22 16:05:32 myshield spamd[2914]: razor2: razor2 check failed: Invalid > argument razor2: razor2 had unknown error during get_server_info at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-12 Thread Marc Perkel
Matt Kettler wrote: Michael Grant wrote: -report? Ahh, I had to do a razor-admin like this: su - root # razor-admin -create # razor-admin -register Even though I had done this initially as just 'su', it was using my homedir to create the .razor directory. Yep. Techni

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Grant wrote: > >> -report? >> > > Ahh, I had to do a razor-admin like this: > > su - root > # razor-admin -create > # razor-admin -register > > Even though I had done this initially as just 'su', it was using my > homedir to create the .razor directory. > Yep. Technically you only n

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-12 Thread Michael Grant
On Dec 12, 2007 5:05 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Grant wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2007 1:09 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Marc Perkel wrote: > >> > >>> What causes this? > >>> > >>> reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report > >>>

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Grant wrote: > On Dec 12, 2007 1:09 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Marc Perkel wrote: >> >>> What causes this? >>> >>> reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report >>> requires authentication >>> >> You didn't run razor-admin --register?

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-11 Thread Marc Perkel
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:19:38AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote: Funny, I too just got this same error and yes, I did a razor-agent -create and -register. [88199] warn: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report requires authentication at [.

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:19:38AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote: > Funny, I too just got this same error and yes, I did a razor-agent > -create and -register. > > [88199] warn: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or > directory report requires authentication at [...] > [88199] info: reporte

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-11 Thread Michael Grant
On Dec 12, 2007 1:09 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Perkel wrote: > > What causes this? > > > > reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report > > requires authentication > You didn't run razor-admin --register? Funny, I too just got this same error and yes, I

Re: Razor Problems

2007-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Marc Perkel wrote: > What causes this? > > reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report > requires authentication You didn't run razor-admin --register?

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-14 Thread Phil Barnett
On Monday 14 May 2007 09:48, Gary V wrote: > >Do you mind if I include your notes with attribution to my document on > >building a MailServer applicance? > > > >-- > >Phil Barnett > > No, of course I don't mind, and credit isn't necessary. But thanks. Great, now if I can learn how to properly spel

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-14 Thread Gary V
Do you mind if I include your notes with attribution to my document on building a MailServer applicance? -- Phil Barnett No, of course I don't mind, and credit isn't necessary. But thanks. Gary V _ More photos, more messages, mor

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-14 Thread Phil Barnett
On Monday 14 May 2007 06:20, Mikael Syska wrote: > Will your notes be available online ? Yes. -- Phil Barnett AI4OF SKCC #600

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-14 Thread Mikael Syska
Phil Barnett wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:25, Gary V wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote: Thanks for the excellent notes! The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and port to the main pyzor server. Don't use th

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-14 Thread Phil Barnett
On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:25, Gary V wrote: > >On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote: > > > >Thanks for the excellent notes! > > > > > The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates > > > /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and > > > >port > > > > > to the main pyzor server

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-13 Thread Gary V
Pyzor is not actively maintained. It has not been for a while. All new pyzor installations use the main pyzor server. That server is overloaded and queries will often timeout (5 seconds wasted). Some generous person (Milton?) created a mirror a while ago and it responds much quicker. The mailin

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-13 Thread Gary V
On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote: Thanks for the excellent notes! > The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates > /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and port > to the main pyzor server. Don't use that server. Edit and change to > 82.94.255.100:24441 Why? --

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-13 Thread Loren Wilton
The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and port to the main pyzor server. Don't use that server. Edit and change to 82.94.255.100:24441 Why? I believe I've read that the main Pyzor servers are noted for returning timeouts rat

Re: razor and pyzor

2007-05-13 Thread Phil Barnett
On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote: Thanks for the excellent notes! > The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates > /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and port > to the main pyzor server. Don't use that server. Edit and change to > 82.94.255.100:24441 Why? -- P

RE: razor and pyzor

2007-05-13 Thread Gary V
PS wget http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/sample-spam.txt razor-check -d sample-spam.txt | more The razor servers run on tcp port 2703. _ PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows Live

RE: razor and pyzor

2007-05-13 Thread Gary V
Greetings I am not new to SA However, I am new to razor and pyzor... I must admit to only cursory viewing of any of those type of posts for the past year or more... Are those of you running medium to high volume mail servers happy with razor and pyzor for just the scoring they provide? Sho

Re: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory - solved

2006-11-24 Thread Chris Purves
Gary V wrote: Gary V wrote: I noticed today that razor-agent.log is placed in the root directory. I have --helper-home-dir=/etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir set as a spamd option, but the log is not being written to there. How can I fix this problem? Thanks. -- Chris This may be an ind

Re: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory

2006-11-24 Thread Chris Purves
Gary V wrote: Gary V wrote: I noticed today that razor-agent.log is placed in the root directory. I have --helper-home-dir=/etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir set as a spamd option, but the log is not being written to there. How can I fix this problem? Thanks. -- Chris This may be an ind

Re: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory

2006-11-24 Thread Gary V
After creating the /root/.razor files, copy the .razor directory to the helper home. cp -r /root/.razor/ /etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir/ Note that this is functionally equivilent to: razor-admin -create -home=/etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir/.razor Gary V ___

Re: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory

2006-11-24 Thread Gary V
Gary V wrote: I noticed today that razor-agent.log is placed in the root directory. I have --helper-home-dir=/etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir set as a spamd option, but the log is not being written to there. How can I fix this problem? Thanks. -- Chris This may be an indication there is

Re: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory

2006-11-24 Thread Chris Purves
Gary V wrote: I noticed today that razor-agent.log is placed in the root directory. I have --helper-home-dir=/etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir set as a spamd option, but the log is not being written to there. How can I fix this problem? Thanks. -- Chris This may be an indication there is

RE: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory

2006-11-24 Thread Gary V
I noticed today that razor-agent.log is placed in the root directory. I have --helper-home-dir=/etc/spamassassin/helper-home-dir set as a spamd option, but the log is not being written to there. How can I fix this problem? Thanks. -- Chris This may be an indication there is no razor-agent

RE: razor-agent.log being placed in root directory

2006-11-24 Thread Sietse van Zanen
I beleive razor log files and config go into the homedir of the user running spamassassin. For me, Í run SA as user spamassassin and that user's homedir is /var/lib/spamassassin. There is a .razor dir there, wheere all the files are. -Sietse From: Chris Purves Sent: Fri 24-Nov-06 0:50 To: u

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-14 Thread Rejaine Monteiro
Thanks all for tips! Anyway, I disabled fuzzy_ocr plugin and cpu load was reduced to ~2. The results without fuzzy are good enough. But, I'll go to make rcpto checks too, to reject invalid messages during the initial SMTP conversation, which is a good thing... Ollie Acheson escreveu: On Fri, N

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-13 Thread Ollie Acheson
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:12:44PM -0200, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > > Ok, validrcptto seems to be nice for me... > I just can't forget to insert all -default aliases (qmail-default) and > use a validrcptto version with this support (to using with qmail-rocks) > > Thanks for all tips > In ca

RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-13 Thread Ring, John C
I've seen a big CPU load with pyzor, but not with razor or DCC (using dccifd). I'd say disable these checks one at a time to see which one is causing the highest loads on your machine, and if your machine can't quite handle the current load, disable the ones with the highest loads, at least tempor

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-10 Thread Rejaine Monteiro
Ok, validrcptto seems to be nice for me... I just can't forget to insert all -default aliases (qmail-default) and use a validrcptto version with this support (to using with qmail-rocks) Thanks for all tips Jim Maul escreveu: Rejaine Monteiro wrote: Like a text-file based (it's not a se

RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-10 Thread R Lists06
> > > Like a text-file based (it's not a security hole?!) or a ldap-replica on > mail-server? > I'm searching for more examples and other ideas and find this patch for > qmail: > http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml > > I don't no if this patch is really necessary.. but it's a su

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-10 Thread Jim Maul
Rejaine Monteiro wrote: Like a text-file based (it's not a security hole?!) or a ldap-replica on mail-server? I'm searching for more examples and other ideas and find this patch for qmail: http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml I don't no if this patch is really necessary.. but

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-10 Thread Rejaine Monteiro
Like a text-file based (it's not a security hole?!) or a ldap-replica on mail-server? I'm searching for more examples and other ideas and find this patch for qmail: http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml I don't no if this patch is really necessary.. but it's a sugestion too...

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-10 Thread Jim Maul
Rejaine Monteiro wrote: But I have various servers with qmail-ldap configuration, where the a first server (simple qmail installation, without ldap) receives mails from internet and check domain using rcpthosts only, does spam and virus checks and them forwards the mail to the others qmail-

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-10 Thread Rejaine Monteiro
il which, obviously, hugely decreased the traffic through spamassassin. Ollie -Original Message- From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:50 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load Rejaine Monteiro wrote:

Re: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-09 Thread Ollie Acheson
reased the traffic through spamassassin. Ollie > > -Original Message- > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:50 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load > > Rejaine Monteiro

RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-09 Thread Jason Little
@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > my system had a high cpu load with spamassassin with network tests , > dcc + razor and fuzzy_ocr because off this, we are considering disable > razor or dcc from tests... > > but we h

RE: razor and dcc : high cpu load

2006-11-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > my system had a high cpu load with spamassassin with network tests , > dcc + razor and fuzzy_ocr > because off this, we are considering disable razor or dcc from > tests... > > but we have doubt about which is better: disable razor or dcc? > > any recomendations?? If t

Re: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, October 2, 2006 18:57, Robert Swan wrote: > I have a legitimate client that I receive e-mail from and they are > listed by Razor (sourceforge.net), among other things. Does any know how > to get someone off of Razor's list? Any help would be appreciated. http://razor.sourceforge.net/docs/

RE: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Bowie Bailey
ce he would say instead of goodbyepeace my brother. > > -Original Message- > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:19 PM > To: SpamAssassin Users > Subject: RE: Razor removal > > Robert Swan wrote: > > I have a legitim

Re: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Bookworm
Robert Swan wrote: These guys are having lots of trouble sending email to people, they are using an exchange 2003 server and are not listed on any SPAM database anywhere, per.. http://www.dnsstuff.com/ Robert They may be using an Exchange Server for actually forwarding emails out, but it loo

Re: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
You can also do a "razor-revoke" on the message. It doesn't necessarily lower the cf rating, but it's a vote none-the-less. :) On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:22:27PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote: > You could try telling the spammer (sorry, sender), to fix their spamming > (sorry, emailing) software. >

RE: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Robert Swan
: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 1:19 PM To: SpamAssassin Users Subject: RE: Razor removal Robert Swan wrote: > I have a legitimate client that I receive e-mail from and they are > listed by Razor (sourceforge.net), among other things. Does any know > h

RE: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Coffey, Neal
Robert Swan wrote: > I have a legitimate client that I receive e-mail from and they are listed > by Razor (sourceforge.net), among other things. Does any know how to get > someone off of Razor's list? Any help would be appreciated. As has been pointed out, Razor does not have a "list" that they pu

Re: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Kelson
Robert Swan wrote: I have a legitimate client that I receive e-mail from and they are listed by Razor (sourceforge.net), among other things. Does any know how to get someone off of Razor’s list? Any help would be appreciated. Razor doesn't list senders. It analyzes the message body, generates

RE: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Randal, Phil
You could try telling the spammer (sorry, sender), to fix their spamming (sorry, emailing) software.   Phil --Phil RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK   From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 October 2006 17:57To: SpamAssassin UsersSubject: Raz

RE: Razor removal

2006-10-02 Thread Bowie Bailey
Robert Swan wrote: > I have a legitimate client that I receive e-mail from and they are > listed by Razor (sourceforge.net), among other things. Does any know > how to get someone off of Razor's list? Any help would be > appreciated. >From the Razor2 FAQ: Q: Razor has blacklisted my email addr

Re: Razor vs Pyzor

2006-08-13 Thread John Andersen
On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:12, David Baron wrote: > Which is best and what do these actauly offer over spamassassin's own > rulesets? The intent of Razor is to use hashes of the body to identify spam by comparing it to previously reported spam.Spam previously trapped by other means is report

RE: Razor vs Pyzor

2006-08-13 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: David Baron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 6:12 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Razor vs Pyzor > > > Which is best and what do these actauly offer over spamassassin's own > rulesets? > Pyzor was a fork of razor

Re: Razor - Does it Work thru Spamc (NEVER MIND)

2006-07-21 Thread John Andersen
On Thursday 20 July 2006 23:49, John Andersen wrote: > Setting my procmailrc script to call spamassassin directly instead > of spamc cause my razor logs to indicate razor is being hit. Doh! Yast still sets spamd to run with the -L flag. I knew I'd seen this before... --

Re: Razor

2006-07-06 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:13:34PM +1000, Leigh Sharpe wrote: > Is there something I need to do to make spamassassin recognize that > Razor is installed? Nope. The modules just have to be found in an @INC path. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Stop searching forever. Happiness is just next to yo

Re: Re: razor is not working ...

2006-06-25 Thread Screaming Eagle
Yeah, it's in init.pre and I just moved it to v312.pre and it's still have the same error.  Any idea?

Re: Re: razor is not working ...

2006-06-25 Thread Nigel Frankcom
Hi, Did you enable: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre file? KR Nigel On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:51:50 -0400, "Screaming Eagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hmm, I know I installed razor, because I just ran a razor-report. >razor-report -v >Raz

Re: razor is not working ...

2006-06-25 Thread Screaming Eagle
Hmm, I know I installed razor, because I just ran a razor-report. razor-report -v Razor Agents 2.82, protocol version 3 Any idea? why spamassassin assassin is saying it's not available. config in local.cf: use_razor2 0 razor_config /etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor/razor-agent.conf I had try both "

Re: razor is not working ...

2006-06-24 Thread Matt Kettler
Screaming Eagle wrote: > I thought I had razor2 working. From the debug output, it does not > seem so. Am i missing something? If so, where can I download it and > install it? Thanks. > >From the looks of it, you enabled the plugin, but you never installed razor itself. http://razor.sf.net > [413

Re: razor-whitelist never works

2006-03-17 Thread Roger Taranto
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 11:34, Matt Rossiter wrote: > Does anyone have some suggestions for me to try? You'll probably have better luck on the razor-users list: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users -Roger

Re: Razor template tags?

2006-02-18 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Marc Perkel wrote: hI, > I see DCC and PYZOR template tags, are there RAZOR template tags? you are missing check symbols of razor, like RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100? look in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre if you uncomment this line: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Raz

Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Thank you :) > > I will learn and also inform you after talk with Cloudmark ! I suspect such contract terms are private.. If you do get anything useful back from them, please make sure it's OK to share them before reposting. That said, if they do agree, please do shar

RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Vahric MUHTARYAN
Thank you :) I will learn and also inform you after talk with Cloudmark ! Thanks Vahric -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:02 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Okey clear ! > > And Do you have license for Razor2 because you said that its for who > has a huge system or You can use it for a shot time ! Merely using the razor client generally doesn't require such negotiations or money. However, they do reserve the right

RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Vahric MUHTARYAN
: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > I will check DCC and Razor2 licensing sir, thanks for informations ... > And I understand from your chart what you mean ;) > > Then you said that " I ran DCC and razor "

Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > I will check DCC and Razor2 licensing sir, thanks for informations ... > And I understand from your chart what you mean ;) > > Then you said that " I ran DCC and razor " which razor are you running ? is > it razor1 sorry I don't understand ... Razor 1?? Does

Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Jim Maul
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: Hi , I will check DCC and Razor2 licensing sir, thanks for informations ... And I understand from your chart what you mean ;) Then you said that " I ran DCC and razor " which razor are you running ? is it razor1 sorry I don't understand ... Most likely razor2. I don

RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Vahric MUHTARYAN
Thank you for all info :) -Original Message- From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:16 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > I want to get some adives ab

RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Vahric MUHTARYAN
I got it sir ;) Thanks -Original Message- From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:10 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor > I want to get some adives about RAZOR / DCC / Pyzor usage ! I don't know &g

RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Vahric MUHTARYAN
balk and spam , also spammers is bulk mailer isn't it ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:08 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor Vahric MUHTARYAN w

RE: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > I want to get some adives about RAZOR / DCC / Pyzor usage ! I don't > know how many people is using they but I need some advise ? > > - I think that DCC and RAZOR will improve spam finding , right ? at > this moment I know that querying will take a tim

Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > I think that DCC and RAZOR will improve spam finding , right > ? at this moment I know that querying will take a time but How many > spamcleanhouse we should use ? That's up to you. I run both DCC and razor with no trouble. > - As for me DCC / RAZOR can be

Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor

2006-01-30 Thread Mike Jackson
I want to get some adives about RAZOR / DCC / Pyzor usage ! I don't know how many people is using they but I need some advise ? - I think that DCC and RAZOR will improve spam finding , right ? at this moment I know that querying will take a time but How many spamcleanhouse we should u

  1   2   >