On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300
Robert Boyl wrote:

> Hi, everyone
> 
> Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor?
> 
> Havent analysed big amount of emails yet, but Ive had a few cases
> where it causes very strange false positives that make no sense.
> 
> and adds a lot of points...
> 
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.36, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 2.43,
> RAZOR2_CHECK 1.73


That's out of date

score RAZOR2_CHECK 0 1.729 0 0.922 # n=0
score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0 2.430 0 1.886 # n=0 n=2


> It says on their site " Detection is done with statistical and
> randomized signatures that efficiently spot mutating spam content. "
> 
> For example those scores were for a totally legit email that had some
> screenshots embedded in the email...

It's nothing to do with that, currently it's based on a combination of
text size and URI domains, it's not far-off being a URIBL.


> Also, how to report FP?

In theory (if it hasn't fallen-off) you can do it through SA (spamc or
spamassassin) or razor-revoke after registering via razor-admin,
but you would need to build-up a reputation before it carries any
weight. There may be something on the cloudmark site as well.

Reply via email to