I got it sir ;) Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:10 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RAZOR or DCC or Pyzor > I want to get some adives about RAZOR / DCC / Pyzor usage ! I don't know > how many people is using they but I need some advise ? > > - I think that DCC and RAZOR will improve spam finding , right ? > at this moment I know that querying will take a time but How many > spamcleanhouse we should use ? > > - As for me DCC / RAZOR can be better thing then bayes rules then > why people fightIng for setting bayes , instead of this informing spams to > DCC/Pyzor and Razor better I guess ? > > - I know that there was a DCC server , any possibility to install > Razor2 server I can't answer all your questions, but on one of the servers I administer, I use both Razor and Pyzor. Here's the stats for the spam received on the server yesterday: Top spam rules: Ham: Spam: % Ham: % Spam: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RAZOR2_CHECK 90 1098 4.32 68.33 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 94 1085 4.52 67.52 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 65 622 3.12 38.71 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 70 861 3.36 53.58 PYZOR_CHECK 75 611 3.60 38.02 Unfortunately, that doesn't provide any data about messages that were detected by both Razor and Pyzor, or by only one or the other, or by neither. I do know that they're quite effective. I figure the overhead of checking messages against both is worth it.
