Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > I want to get some adives about RAZOR / DCC / Pyzor usage ! I don't > know how many people is using they but I need some advise ? > > - I think that DCC and RAZOR will improve spam finding , right ? at > this moment I know that querying will take a time but How many > spamcleanhouse we should use ?
DCC and Razor will improve your detection rate. They do take a bit more time and resources, but it shouldn't be unreasonable. Try it and see. I don't know what you mean by "how many spamcleanhouse?" > - As for me DCC / RAZOR can be better thing then bayes rules then why > people fightIng for setting bayes , instead of this informing spams to > DCC/Pyzor and Razor better I guess ? DCC / Razor are not better than bayes, just different. From my point of view, the more different ways you have to find spam, the better. Some people like Bayes, some don't, but it is completely different from either Razor or DCC. > - I know that there was a DCC server , any possibility to install > Razor2 server ! I'm not sure about that, I haven't looked into either. > - in DCC docs said that DCC mark mails like a SPAM , any possibility > to adding point to spamassassin because if it's sure then makine spam > check with spamassassin will be unnecessary ! When DCC is used with SpamAssassin, it is given a score like any other rule. Nothing is a sure bet where spam is concerned! -- Bowie
