On 6/9/2015 4:25 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:16:00 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets
TO_
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:16:00 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
> >> TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
> >> Can one please explain to me why message A gets
> >> TO_NO_BRKTS
Am 09.06.2015 um 15:55 schrieb Reindl
Harald:
Am 09.06.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Martin Fernau:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On
with
TO_NO_BRKTS
Am 09.06.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Kevin A.
McGrail:
On
6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On
with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY h
On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
HTML_ONLY means what it says - no plaintext a
On 6/9/2015 9:49 AM, Martin Fernau wrote:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
Message A:
Content-Type: multipart
Am 09.06.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Martin Fernau:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
HTML_ONLY means what it says - n