On 6/9/2015 9:49 AM, Martin Fernau wrote:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
Message A:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_2_207789126.1433844820251"
Message B:
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
As you can see, message A gets higher rating because of
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY. But for both messages the "To" is identical and
both mails only have HTML content.
The TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY builds on MIME_HTML_ONLY which requires a
multipart message.
describe MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME
parts
The rule doesn't fire because B is not a multipart message.
The reason why I ask is because message A is generated by a piece of
software from me and sometimes those messages are marked as spam
(because they sometimes get DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 and XPRIO with 1.0
points each). I try to understand why my "To" is so wrong and if it is
'better' to change the software to always produce
To: "martin.fer...@fernausoft.de" <martin.fer...@fernausoft.de>
just to get rid of this.
Is it always a better idea to generate the To-Line like this even if I
have no real name for the receiver?
I would likely focus on generating a multipart email with text/plain and
text/html parts as well as the URIBL_BLOCKED which will fix the issue in
a different way.
regards,
KAM
