On 6/9/2015 4:25 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:16:00 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY and why message B didn't?
HTML_ONLY means what it says - no plaintext alternate
I believe that's on the right track but slightly misleading. My quick
analysis is that the rule is really TO_NO_BRKTS & MIME_HTML_ONLY. So
if it's not a MIME multipart email but still in HTML only, it won't
trigger.
It looks like it will:
sub check_for_mime_html_only {
my ($self, $pms) = @_;
my $ctype = $pms->get('Content-Type');
return 1 if $ctype =~ m{^text/html}i;
$self->_check_attachments($pms) unless exists
$pms->{mime_body_html_count}; return ($pms->{mime_body_html_count} >
0 && $pms->{mime_body_text_count} == 0);
Interesting. I didn't check the eval but assuming the get on the content
type hits, I would think it would return 1 on that based on:
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
