RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK|On a side note, to anyone watching this
seemingly incredible
long discusion about one FP:
|This is typically what URIBL member do. We take every FP and delist request
seriously. We do deep
research on |each one. Much deeper then anything you have seen here in
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
On a side note, to anyone watching this seemingly incredible long discusion about one FP:
This is typically what URIBL member do. We take every FP and delist request seriously. We do deep research on each one. Much deeper then anything you have
jdow wrote:
> From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Let's look at their IPs they are hosting their domain from:
>> $ host uhmcargo*MUNGED*.com
>
> Fascinating - even the whois registration seems to have MPD, er Multiple
> Personality Disorder. This is what I got in part:
> ===8<---
> Regist
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM
To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler'
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: My only problem with
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got
captured. The mailing was from
Monster.com and the customer is livid :-(
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message
> -Original Message-
> From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:36 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
>
>...
>> What are your thoughts guys? Lower the score for URI_BLACK and JP?
>>
>
>seriously? the domains is 3 days old and is unreachable, and uses
>outfitter.net NS's which appear to have an identity crisis.
>
>April 25th,
>ns1.outfiter.net 206.173.156.105
>ns2.outfiter.net 24.98.13.40
>
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
>>
>> http://www.joewein.net/fraud/fraud-job-2006-04.htm
>>
>>
>
> i posted that, and reposted it due to list reject, about 30 min ago.
> did it not come through?
It depends upon how you define "came through"...
Posted to the list - [OK]
Delivered from list to my serv
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 15:29
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
> Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > resend aga
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> resend again because SA is bouncing them..
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:51
>> To: Chris Santerre
>> Cc: ''; users@spamassassin.a
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 17:37 wrote:
> Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this
> specific mailing.
He should just filter back those mails from the SPAM folder. You do send
all SPAM to him anyway, just marked, don't you? So he has it.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monn
resend again because SA is bouncing them..
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:51
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: ''; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLA
e-
> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:42
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
> Chris and Dallas,
>
> Thank you for pointing this out. I will convey th
Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
| Chris Santerre wrote:
| >
| >
| >> -Original Message-
| >> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM
| >> To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettl
Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM
>> To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler'
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: My only proble
Chris and Dallas,
Thank you for pointing this out. I will convey this back to the customer.
- Original Message -
From: "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
| > --
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:12
> To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler'
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
> RE: My only problem with U
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler'
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URI
RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got captured. The
mailing was from
Monster.com and the customer is livid :-(
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
* 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
* [URIs: uhm
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:12 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:32 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>>
>> I've scored GREY at 0.1 as an informational rule. It's S/O is
>> so poor it is more
>> qualified to be a nonspam rule. ( 0.354 in the nightly
>> mass-check Theo posted)
>
> Thats actually perfect. Exactly what it was designed to be :)
>
> Had it been around .8xx I w
Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Are you referring to 's customers, or anyone who's using
>> URIBL_BLACK?
>
> Just his customer. :)
>
> I'm not that crazy!
Are you sure? :)
Oh, wait.. I forgot.. the first rule of the crazy sysadmins club is...
Chris Santerre wrote:
>>
>> Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who
>> wants this specific mailing.
>
> Voluntary Human Shileds. They should find another provider, as the needs
> of the many outweight the needs of the few.
>
Are you referring to 's customers, or anyone who'
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
> I've scored GREY at 0.1 as an informational rule. It's S/O is
> so poor it is more
> qualified to be a nonspam rule. ( 0.354 in the nightly
> mass-check Theo posted)
Thats actually perfect. Exactly what it was de
wrote:
> | >
> | > Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this
> specific mailing.
> | >
> | Have you tried lowering the score of the spamassassin rules that are
> | getting hit?
> |
> | Jay
>
>
> I'll look at a couple of the examples and see what else is firing. I
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:44
> To: Jay Lee
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
> | >
> | > Easier said than done when you have a paying cu
| >
| > Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this
specific mailing.
| >
| Have you tried lowering the score of the spamassassin rules that are
| getting hit?
|
| Jay
I'll look at a couple of the examples and see what else is firing. I may have
to tune URI_BLACK
down
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
> | But.
> |
> | There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists.
> |
> | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example.
> |
> | I call this stuff "subscription spam&q
wrote:
| But.
|
| There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists.
|
| I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example.
|
| I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway.
|
| Cheers,
|
| Phil
Easier said than done when you hav
| But.
|
| There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists.
|
| I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example.
|
| I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway.
|
| Cheers,
|
| Phil
Easier said than done when you have a paying cust
But.
There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists.
I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example.
I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway.
Cheers,
Phil
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
32 matches
Mail list logo
