On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
It is, however, a seriously
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
>>> address this.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch
>>
>> Thanks John, I'v
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
address this.
http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch
Thanks John, I've read this before I posted my question on the ML.
You said you're using de
> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
> address this.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch
>
Thanks John, I've read this before I posted my question on the ML.
> You said you're using debain squeeze...
>
> http://bu
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
All I can think of at this point is permissions issues somehow.
The FuzzyOcr/Misc.pm might be masking the real exit code. It evals a bunch
of Perl code in the child process and then:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> All I can think of at this point is permissions issues somehow.
The FuzzyOcr/Misc.pm might be masking the real exit code. It evals a bunch
of Perl code in the child process and then:
# couldn't open file descriptors or exe
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
I took a quick look at the sources for jpegtopnm and could not see
anything that would return an error code of 2048. What OS is this on?
FuzzyOCR is returning $? as the "retcode", which is
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> I took a quick look at the sources for jpegtopnm and could not see
> anything that would return an error code of 2048. What OS is this on?
FuzzyOCR is returning $? as the "retcode", which is not the exit code.
It's the exit _status_,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
Mail through mail server does does not recognise the spam image and
generates an error.
Through manual test works fine.
That strongly suggests something in the environment of mail delivery is
different than during manual testing.
The most likely problem i
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> Okay, no error with the test message.
>>>
>>> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>>>
>>> Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Ok.
>
>>> Was this test message me
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
Okay, no error with the test message.
So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
Yes.
Ok.
Was this test message menually composed for testing purposes, or was it a
real incoming message that had g
> Okay, no error with the test message.
>
> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>
> Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
Yes.
>
> Was this test message menually composed for testing purposes, or was it a
> real incoming message that had generated errors when processed?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
...okay. What was the debugging output from that run?
See attachment.
Jul 11 14:55:35.969 [14578] dbg: FuzzyOcr: Elapsed [14581]: 0.007670 sec.
(/usr/bin/jpegtopnm: exit 0)
Okay, no error with the test message.
So far we haven't been able to reproduce t
> ...okay. What was the debugging output from that run?
>
See attachment.
> Does normal delivery run as root, or as a different user? If it runs as a
> different user, can that user perform the above manual test successfully?
>
Runs as root.
> Are you still seeing errors for normal mail deliv
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
The example eml from Spamassassin works fine:
# spamassassin --debug FuzzyOCR > output
# cat output
Content analysis details: (24.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- ---
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:18 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>>
>>> OK. Just to be clear, you took a jpeg-format image file and used
>>> jpegtopnm
>>> to convert it to a pnm file, and got a correct .pnm image file
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
OK. Just to be clear, you took a jpeg-format image file and used jpegtopnm
to convert it to a pnm file, and got a correct .pnm image file out? Did you
do this to verify the exit code from jpegtopnm:
echo
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Sergey Tsabolov ( aka linuxman )
wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2011 06:34 μμ, polloxx wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Works fine at the CL.
>> Nothing about the error. (It's a SA error I think)
>> apt-get did not alter jpegtopnm.
>
> I think you need update you Debian repositories
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Brian Bebeau wrote:
>> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
>> following error in the log:
>>
>> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
>> [2048], skipping...
>
> I had this problem too, after upgrading SA to 3.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>> Works fine at the CL.
>
> OK. Just to be clear, you took a jpeg-format image file and used jpegtopnm
> to convert it to a pnm file, and got a correct .pnm image file out? Did you
> do this to verify the ex
On 06/07/2011 06:34 μμ, polloxx wrote:
John,
Works fine at the CL.
Nothing about the error. (It's a SA error I think)
apt-get did not alter jpegtopnm.
I think you need update you Debian repositories to newest and try to
update packages.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
O
> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
> following error in the log:
>
> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
> [2048], skipping...
I had this problem too, after upgrading SA to 3.3.x and FuzzyOCR to 3.6.0.
Upgrading netpbm fixed it for me.
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
Works fine at the CL.
OK. Just to be clear, you took a jpeg-format image file and used jpegtopnm
to convert it to a pnm file, and got a correct .pnm image file out? Did
you do this to verify the exit code from jpegtopnm:
echo $?
Nothing about the er
John,
Works fine at the CL.
Nothing about the error. (It's a SA error I think)
apt-get did not alter jpegtopnm.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>> nobody?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear,
>>>
>>> after
Sergey,
reinstall fuzzyocr did not help.
What should I see in the OSSpecificNotes?
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Sergey Tsabolov (aka linuxman)
wrote:
> Στις 06/07/2011 04:53 μμ, ο/η polloxx έγραψε:
>
> nobody?
>
> You are try to reinstall it ?
> See the notes here http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
nobody?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in the log:
FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
[2048], skipping...
System is a De
06/07/2011 04:53 ??, ?/? polloxx ??:
nobody?
You are try to reinstall it ?
See the notes here http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/OSSpecificNotes
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in t
nobody?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
> Dear,
>
> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
> following error in the log:
>
> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
> [2048], skipping...
>
> System is a Debian Squeeze Running Spa
John Wilcock wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:31:07 +0100:
> Presumably because you didn't run sa-update while the ruleset was
> missing from the update...
Hm, it *is* missing. But maybe not from the compiled rules, well.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.co
Le 27/01/2010 22:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Presumably becaus
At 10:02 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, John Wilcock wrote -=>
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
> someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
> sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http:/
g the same rules...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: John Wilcock [mailto:j...@tradoc.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:03 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fuzzyocr and rule errors after upgrade to 3.3.0
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
>> Either someon
On 1/27/2010 1:02 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the bu
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the build scripts does
the wrong thing with the 3.3
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:43, John Wilcock wrote:
> To state the problem again, 463 of the scores in the 50_scores.cf from 3.3.0
> sa-update refer to rules that used to be in 72_active.cf or 80_additional.cf
> in 3.2.5, but that neither of these two files are anywhere to be found in
> the 3.3.0 s
Le 27/01/2010 17:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
No, absolutely not. On this test box I haven't changed the scores of any
rules. There are absol
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
> Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
> However, these two files don't seem to exist in
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000/updates_spamassassin_org/
Indeed, that's why you are getti
Le 27/01/2010 07:30, Ed Kasky a écrit :
Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after teand continue to get
a slew of them...
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
With the exception of ACCESSDB where the score is set to 0 anyway
At 03:31 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-ex
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after tean
troxlinux wrote:
> hi list , I add the FuzzyOcr from the svn to my spamassassin, install
> all dependences that FuzzyOcr needs to work, but when they send me an
> image it shows me this error:
>
> amavis[4056]: (04056-06) (!)SA error: FuzzyOcr: /usr/bin/pngtopnm:
> Returned [256], skipping...
Y
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:19:50 -0400
David Ronis wrote:
> I've been playing with FuzzyOcr and FacileOCR in spamassassin (current
> trunk). Both plugins are built and installed, and test properly;
> however,
> ...
> Doesn't look like the tests are being triggered. Anybody know why?
I don't know
decoder wrote:
> after quite some time, I've decided to release another version of
> FuzzyOcr...
Where's the best place to provide feedback/bug reports for FuzzyOCR? Is
this list okay, or would you prefer folks open tickets on the website,
or something else?
Nels Lindquist
Chris,
> > AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
> > don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
> > something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
>
> If you consider this feature so important, then I could implement a
> max_score feat
RW wrote:
AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
If you consider this feature so important, then I could implement a
max_score feature that
On Wed, 27 May 2009 21:19:58 -0500
René Berber wrote:
> RW wrote:
>
> > AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR
> > score. I don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the
> > likelyhood of something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
>
> Isn't that done by s
RW wrote:
> AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
> don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
> something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
Isn't that done by setting focr_add_score to 0.0? The total score in
this case should be
On Wed, 27 May 2009 19:10:57 -0500
René Berber wrote:
> You should mention that scores and sensitivity are configurable (even
> individually for each word / term; I use low scores for short words,
> for instance). And all is documented on the fuzzy perl library used.
AFAIK though it isn't possi
decoder wrote:
[snip]
> See http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads for more details.
>
> Although I still can't invest that much time into the project at this
> point, there are some features I'd like to add though in the near
> future, such as regex support. I also considered rewriting the
Andrew Bruce wrote:
>
> I've been looking at some of the spam emails I've received lately with
> images attached and noticed that FuzzyOCR wasn't running against them.
>
>
>
> The same seems to be true when I take these messages and run them with:
>
> spamassassin -t < img-email.eml
>
>
>
> How
Andrew Bruce wrote:
> I've been looking at some of the spam emails I've received lately with
> images attached and noticed that FuzzyOCR wasn't running against them.
>
[snip]
> However if I run them through as follows, I get FuzzyOCR showing up in
> the results:
>
> spamassassin -t -D < img-emai
Sorry this reply is a bit late, but the problem is a bug in FuzzyOCR. When a
message has multiple images, it ends up appending to the text file instead
of replacing it. The bug is in routine open_on_specific_fd in Misc.pm:
$fname =~ s/> *// and $flags |= O_CREAT|O_WRONLY;
should be
$fname =~ s/
NFN Smith wrote:
[snip]
On the Pillz, there's one that looks like a Yambo one, and I finally
tweaked my terms list enough that I'm getting a couple of FuzzyOcr
points on that, but not quite enough to force a rejection. There's also
one pillz that's pretty offensive (but fairly infrequent) --
Loren Wilton wrote:
Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ?
I haven't seen any changes recently, nor any discussion on the FuzzyOCR
mailing list. But then I haven't seen a lot of OCR spams going by since the
stock spams cut down in volume a while back.
I'd say its a good tool to kee
Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ?
I haven't seen any changes recently, nor any discussion on the FuzzyOCR
mailing list. But then I haven't seen a lot of OCR spams going by since the
stock spams cut down in volume a while back.
I'd say its a good tool to keep around just to keep
Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phon
Hi Rob,
> I'm using FuzzyOCR from SVN (don't know if that's the problem) and was
> unable to apply the patch because I got this error:
>
> patching file FuzzyOcr/Deanimate.pm
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 64 (offset 17 lines).
> patch: malformed patch at line 115:
>
> I manually applied the chan
Dear Matus,
> > Olivier Nicole writes:
> > > This ticket in FuzzyOcr http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ticket/15 is
> > > proposing to send the text resulting from from the OCR process back to
> > > SA for analysis.
> > >
> > > I fully second that idea but I am wondering *what* text to push back:
> >
> Olivier Nicole writes:
> > This ticket in FuzzyOcr http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ticket/15 is
> > proposing to send the text resulting from from the OCR process back to
> > SA for analysis.
> >
> > I fully second that idea but I am wondering *what* text to push back:
> > depending on teh scanset
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By default FuzzyOcr will analize only one frame from animated GIFs.
>
> If the animation goes one word by frame: "Click", "Here", "Now",
> selecting only one frame will give no sensible result. It woul dbe
> better to concatenate all the frames into one single imag
Olivier Nicole writes:
> Hi,
>
> This ticket in FuzzyOcr http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ticket/15 is
> proposing to send the text resulting from from the OCR process back to
> SA for analysis.
>
> I fully second that idea but I am wondering *what* text to push back:
> depending on teh scanset bein
Shahzad Abid wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Shahzad Abid wrote:
>>
>>> Olivier Nicole wrote:
>>>
> I am getting FuzzyOCS related errors in my mail.log I have search the
> web but unable to find proper solution for this problem, details are
> given below;
>
>
Dear Shahzad,
The error message says:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm: Can't locate FuzzyOcr/Logging.pm in @INC
(@INC contains: /etc/mail/spamassassin
It means it is looking for a file with the full pathname being
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/Logging.pm
In the ls command you sent us, the
Matt Kettler wrote:
Shahzad Abid wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
I am getting FuzzyOCS related errors in my mail.log I have search the
web but unable to find proper solution for this problem, details are
given below;
[...]
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm line
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
This is a wild guess, but what do you have in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/ directory?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin/
And what is the output of:
ls -al /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# ls -l /etc/mail/spamass
Shahzad Abid wrote:
> Olivier Nicole wrote:
>>> I am getting FuzzyOCS related errors in my mail.log I have search the
>>> web but unable to find proper solution for this problem, details are
>>> given below;
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm line 24.
>>> [21809] warn:
>> This is a wild guess, but what do you have in
>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/ directory?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin/
And what is the output of:
ls -al /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/
Olivier Nicole wrote:
I am getting FuzzyOCS related errors in my mail.log I have search the
web but unable to find proper solution for this problem, details are
given below;
[...]
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm line 24.
[21809] warn: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/etc/mail/
Olivier Nicole wrote:
I am getting FuzzyOCS related errors in my mail.log I have search the
web but unable to find proper solution for this problem, details are
given below;
[...]
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm line 24.
[21809] warn: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/etc/mail/
> I am getting FuzzyOCS related errors in my mail.log I have search the
> web but unable to find proper solution for this problem, details are
> given below;
[...]
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm line 24.
> [21809] warn: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr
Martin Svensson wrote:
> Sorry for bumping this, but I still haven't found a solution. Any hints
> are most appreciated.
Isolate a sample email and send it to the FuzzyOcr list, or report it as a
possible problem in its bug tracker: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ .
[snip]
> Has anyone noticed
Sorry for bumping this, but I still haven't found a solution. Any hints are
most appreciated.
Thanks.
/martin
On 10/15/07, Martin Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've just installed Fuzzyocr 3.5.1 with SA 3.1.9 on RHEL 5 (Gifsicle 1.48)
> and I've noticed some issues with gif
Dears,
I would like to limit the maximum score a message would get by hitting
FuzzyOcr words.
I have v. 3.5.1 installed.
Do you know of any suitable setting? I put a glance at the source but I
didn't find anything suitable.
Thanks,
Giampaolo
You can limit the total score with this patch (ed
> Hi!
>
> This is my first post. I have installed SpamAsassin 3.2.2 and i want to
> use FuzzyOCR Plugin, but on the plugin's page i see: "Please note that
> the current stable release is not SA 3.2.x compatible" and i don't want
> to use not stable version.
> What can I do? The are more plugins li
René Berber wrote:
> John Thompson wrote:
>
>> I've gotten a number of image spams that don't trigger FuzzyOcr at all
>> for some reason, e.g. http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/DPO.gif
> [snip]
>> Using spamassassin-3.2.3, FuzzyOcr-3.4, gocr-0.44, ocrad-0.16 on
>> FreeBSD-6.2. If I use the FuzzyOcr sa
John Thompson wrote:
> I've gotten a number of image spams that don't trigger FuzzyOcr at all
> for some reason, e.g. http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/DPO.gif
[snip]
> Using spamassassin-3.2.3, FuzzyOcr-3.4, gocr-0.44, ocrad-0.16 on
> FreeBSD-6.2. If I use the FuzzyOcr sample image spams, it seems to
On 07/18/07 01:21, René Berber wrote:
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
In an older episode (Tuesday, 17. July 2007 21:43), René Berber wrote:
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
You can add a line to FuzzyOcr.pm :
use POSIX;
That line is already there.
Sorry, I should have said:
use POSIX qw(SIGTERM);
yes,
It depends on the versions you have, both FuzzyOcr and perl.
The "use POSIX" is what FO 3.5.1 currently has, and it works fine with
perl
5.8.7 and 5.8.8, but from my experience, it didn't work with 5.8.6 so I
needed
to add the "use POSIX qw(SIGTERM)" ... but don't make much of what I say,
the
SI
JT DeLys wrote:
> sorry, i'm a little confused ...
>
> iiuc, the fix applies -- at least -- to the NON-svn release.
>
> but does it ALSO apply to the svn co? is it needed there?
>
> currently, i have:
>
>svn up
>At revision 132.
>
> but, still have 'just'
>grep -i posix FuzzyO
Hi,
or you can update from SVN that module
sorry, i'm a little confused ...
iiuc, the fix applies -- at least -- to the NON-svn release.
but does it ALSO apply to the svn co? is it needed there?
currently, i have:
svn up
At revision 132.
but, still have 'just'
grep -i posix Fuzz
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> In an older episode (Tuesday, 17. July 2007 21:43), René Berber wrote:
>> Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
>
>>> 2. What can I do to solve that?
>> You can add a line to FuzzyOcr.pm :
>>
>> use POSIX;
>
> That line is already there.
Sorry, I should have said:
use POSIX qw(SIGTER
In an older episode (Tuesday, 17. July 2007 21:43), René Berber wrote:
> Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> > 2. What can I do to solve that?
>
> You can add a line to FuzzyOcr.pm :
>
> use POSIX;
That line is already there.
>
> or you can update from SVN that module
Thanks, I think I will test that.
w
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> in a test installation of FuzzyOcr 3.5.1 in SA 3.1.8 I get the following
> output when running spamassassin < some_message on the command line:
>
> Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_CREAT redefined at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/Exporter.pm line 65.
> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/i386-linux-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russell Galpin wrote:
> Hi There
>
> I'm running SA 3.2.1 with the latest version of FuzzyOCR (from svn) and I'm
> receiving the same error over and over again in my mail logs:
>
> Jun 25 17:25:56 mta1 spamd[629]: Use of uninitialized value in string e
Hello all,
I've just comitted some changes to our SVN that fixes the ugly
formatting problems that came up with SA 3.1.8 and higher.
The new version should display results with a proper formatting in the
SA report, without screwing up the FuzzyOcr logging output.
Thanks to Justin Mason for poi
I'd like to see a feature on FuzzyOCR to cap the points it adds. Sometimes
it really goes wildwhere it's a false positive and adds over 40 points. I'd
like to cap it at 8 or so.
You can use a hack in the mean time:
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/capFuzzy.txt
Gary V
Hello,
I'm getting the same results as yourself and have not come to a conclusion
to this as yet.
My logs show:
[21974] warn: FuzzyOcr: Timed out
[21974] warn: FuzzyOcr: /usr/local/bin/gifsicle: cannot extract image#3
[21974] error: FuzzyOcr: /usr/local/netpbm/bin/giftopnm: Returned [32512],
ski
The installation notes for Fedora Core (version 5 and 6) should say that the
rpm needed
is giflib-utils not libungif-utils. Can someone amend the wiki please? I don't
know how
to use a wiki (in fact I really don't like them).
Cheers
Bill
--
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
www.maidment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:51:59 -0400 (EDT), Frank Bures wrote:
>For no apparent reason I started to see the following error messages (huge
>amounts of them) when I run 'sa-learn' or 'spamassassin --lint'
>
>Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt (<)
>
> I'm running Spamassassin on OpenSuse 10.2 and have just installed
> FuzzyOCR.
>
> It appears to be working in that it scans/detects words in the supplied
> test files.
>
> I noticed "spamassassin --lint" gives:
>
> [25313] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for pamthreshold
> [25313] wa
Paul Hutchings wrote:
> I'm running Spamassassin on OpenSuse 10.2 and have just installed
> FuzzyOCR.
>
> It appears to be working in that it scans/detects words in the supplied
> test files.
>
> I noticed "spamassassin --lint" gives:
>
> [25313] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for pamth
Mário Gamito wrote:
[snip]
> [30747] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
> 'DCC_CHECK'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
> 'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined
> depend
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
What are the details of that score?
If you want more detail, save your complete message for instance as test.eml,
and run: spamassassin -x -t -D FuzzyOcr < test.eml
-
[30747] info: rules: meta
Mário Gamito wrote:
> I've just installed FuzzyOCR and it's really a great tool.
> Awesome.
>
> I think it just has a glitch (maybe may bad, that's why i'm asking).
> It gives very low scores to the messages.
>
> I sent this testing e-mail with this picture:
> http://www.gamito.org/teste.jpg
>
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
What does a "spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr [EMAIL PROTECTED] cur]# spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr <
1173546266.26462.mail.telbit.pt\,S\=82421\:2\,
[26671] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[26671] info: rules: meta
Well, start with carefully reading the documentation. It will give you better
understanding.
What does a "spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the
auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR
Hi,
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the
auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR doesn't run when a message reaches that score. This saves
resources. To debug, make the auto_diable scor 100
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR doesn't run when a message reaches that score. This saves resources. To debug, make the auto_diable scor 100 or so.
-Sietse
From: Mário
Arjan Schrijver wrote:
> I have a very strange problem with FuzzyOCR in combination with SA.
...
> $ spamassassin -D < spamtestmail.txt
>
> Everything works correctly when I run it this way. I get the debug output
> from SA and it shows that FuzzyOCR runs and detects the image spam.
> It also out
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
