Sorry this reply is a bit late, but the problem is a bug in FuzzyOCR. When a message has multiple images, it ends up appending to the text file instead of replacing it. The bug is in routine open_on_specific_fd in Misc.pm:
$fname =~ s/> *// and $flags |= O_CREAT|O_WRONLY; should be $fname =~ s/> *// and $flags |= O_CREAT|O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC; (and you have to add O_TRUNC to the import list at the top of the module too). I logged this as ticket 555 on the FuzzyOCR website. Having fixed that, I'm not sure that FuzzyOCR is helping much. Also I've lowered the FUZZY_OCR_WRONG_EXTENSION score as it was occasionally firing multiple times on non-spam. Dave Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I've had FuzzyOCR running for quite a while. Today I found a false > positive for it that is a bit strange. > > The message has seven images. FuzzyOCR claims to have found the word > "service" in five of them (and counted it 10 times for a score of 6.5). > However, I can only see the word in one of the images and only three of > the seven images have any text at all. Is there a problem here? > > Is FuzzyOCR still useful? It doesn't seem to hit a lot for me. > > %OFMAIL: 1.18 > %OFSPAM: 3.41 > %OFHAM: 0.26 > > -- > Bowie > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FuzzyOCR-tp19672684p20581027.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
