Mário Gamito wrote:
[snip]
> [30747] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
> 'DCC_CHECK'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
> 'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined
> dependency 'SARE_XMAIL_SUSP2'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined
> dependency 'SARE_HEAD_XAUTH_WARN'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has dependency
> 'X_AUTH_WARN_FAKED' with a zero score
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_TINY'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_OBFU_CIALIS has undefined dependency
> 'SARE_OBFU_CIALIS2'
[snip]
> 
> What are those "undefined dependencies" ?

As you can see, most are from SARE rules, they are only warnings not a real
problem, and they are literally what they say: an undefined dependency.

For instance SARE_OBFU_CIALIS, you probably have the file 70_sare_obfu0.cf in
/etc/mail/spamassassin, then you have something different than me since I can't
find a reference to SARE_OBFU_CIALIS2, perhaps you have an old version.

Try looking into the SARE files with: grep SARE_OBFU_CIALIS2 *.cf; better yet,
try updating your "Ruled Du Jour".
-- 
René Berber

Reply via email to