I found what is wrong.Thank u Karsten
The problem was format of the email files. There are two extra headers in
the beginning of the emails
FROM: and RCPT TO:.So I removed all these headers and now spamassassin is
doing its job which is excellent:)
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 03:54 -0800, cnone wrote:
> I scanned over 2000 mails and it gave me score over 5.0 for all of them. Most
> of the scores were 5.4.Is there a way to change default threshold? By the
Yes, there is. Mind having a look at your configuration? The default
local.cf ships with a gla
On 09.02.09 03:54, cnone wrote:
> I scanned over 2000 mails and it gave me score over 5.0 for all of them.
If they are not really spams, there is something broken in your
configuration apparently
> Most of the scores were 5.4.Is there a way to change default threshold? By
> the way if the score i
I scanned over 2000 mails and it gave me score over 5.0 for all of them. Most
of the scores were 5.4.Is there a way to change default threshold? By the
way if the score is very higher than 5.0 like 8.0,does that mean it has the
highest probability to be a spam?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
> > Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not
> > be accurate?
On 09.02.09 03:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one
> hundred percent accurately iden
Yes each file contains only one email.I have also mbox files containing
multiple messages but they dont have content section.They only have
headers.So I dont know how accurate results I will get.
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
>> Thank u very muc
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
> Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not
> be accurate?
By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one
hundred percent accurately identify spam. Whenever any program is
involved, there's alw
Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not
be accurate?
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 16:37 -0800, cnone wrote:
>> How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email
>> files)
>> under a directory and decide which is spam
I would use "formail -s" to go through the mbox file, and pipe the
mail through procmail w/ an appropriate recipe file to filter the mails as
you'd want.
SpamAssassin is happy to markup your mails, but has no filtering capabilities
since it doesn't deliver mail.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:37:30PM
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 16:37 -0800, cnone wrote:
> How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email files)
> under a directory and decide which is spam which is not and save the spams
> in a different dir?
$ man spamc
$ for f in *; do spamc -c < $f || mv $f spam/; done
Bewar
10 matches
Mail list logo
