On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
> Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not
> be accurate?
By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one
hundred percent accurately identify spam. Whenever any program is
involved, there's always a possibility for mis-classified mail. Only a
human can be more accurate.
As I hinted, the accuracy highly depends on your SA installation, and
even much more on your specific configuration and run-time data (like
Bayes).
> Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
Nope. There is only one. Seriously. (This is nabble, you know...)
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 16:37 -0800, cnone wrote:
> >> How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email files)
^^^^
> >> under a directory and decide which is spam which is not and save the spams
> >> in a different dir?
Ah, blarg. :/ Sorry, I mentally dropped the "mbox" once I read the
plural files, and assumed maildir.
As Theo already mentioned, if this are really mbox files possibly
containing more than a single email each, you will need to pipe the
files to 'formail -s' to call spamc with the resulting split emails.
Also, you will need more magic to "move" identified spam -- which
actually will not be a move, given mbox files. procmail is your friend
here.
My previously posted shell command will *not* work with mbox files
containing multiple messages. It will only work for single-email-per-
file maildirs.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
