> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote: > > Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will not > > be accurate?
On 09.02.09 03:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one > hundred percent accurately identify spam. Whenever any program is > involved, there's always a possibility for mis-classified mail. Only a > human can be more accurate. In addition, network rules like RAZOR, DCC, PYZOR, URIBL and some blacklists are time-dependt, not only they start hitting some time after spam starts spreading, but they also stop hitting some time after it stops. When checking older mail, you may not find it in those services. So late recipients may have problems similar to early recipients. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Silvester Stallone: Father of the RISC concept.
