Yes each file contains only one email.I have also mbox files containing
multiple messages but they dont have content section.They only have
headers.So I dont know how accurate results I will get.
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:39 -0800, cnone wrote:
>> Thank u very much.It works.By not accurate,you mean spam detection will
>> not
>> be accurate?
>
> By "accurate" I mean -- SA can do a best effort guess. SA can not one
> hundred percent accurately identify spam. Whenever any program is
> involved, there's always a possibility for mis-classified mail. Only a
> human can be more accurate.
>
> As I hinted, the accuracy highly depends on your SA installation, and
> even much more on your specific configuration and run-time data (like
> Bayes).
>
>
>> Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> Nope. There is only one. Seriously. (This is nabble, you know...)
>
>> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 16:37 -0800, cnone wrote:
>> >> How can I call spamc and loop through all mails(like 100 mbox email
>> files)
> ^^^^
>> >> under a directory and decide which is spam which is not and save the
>> spams
>> >> in a different dir?
>
> Ah, blarg. :/ Sorry, I mentally dropped the "mbox" once I read the
> plural files, and assumed maildir.
>
> As Theo already mentioned, if this are really mbox files possibly
> containing more than a single email each, you will need to pipe the
> files to 'formail -s' to call spamc with the resulting split emails.
> Also, you will need more magic to "move" identified spam -- which
> actually will not be a move, given mbox files. procmail is your friend
> here.
>
> My previously posted shell command will *not* work with mbox files
> containing multiple messages. It will only work for single-email-per-
> file maildirs.
>
>
> --
> char
> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8?
> c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Calling-spamc-and-looping-through-files-tp21905369p21906389.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
