>
> Am 14.03.2015 um 16:45 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> ...but as I mentioned before, training spam from mail to non-existent
> recipients may be even a good thing…
I would not train from mail to non-existent recipients, but would restrict to a
defined set of spamtraps (which may have bee
On 14.03.15 15:00, Filip Havlíček wrote:
I manage email through ISPConfig, I think wildcard for any domain is
not set.
seems you have relay_recipient_maps set, isn't your domain listed there?
note that postfix rejects non-existing recipients by default
(http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sm
I manage email through ISPConfig, I think wildcard for any domain is not
set.
Dne 13.3.2015 v 16:02 Matus UHLAR - fantomas napsal(a):
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 13.03.15 14:54, F
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 13.03.15 14:54, Filip Havlíček wrote:
there is my configuration:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf: http://pastebin.com/PM5jN8wi
/etc/postfix/main.cf: http://pa
Hi,
there is my configuration:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf: http://pastebin.com/PM5jN8wi
/etc/postfix/main.cf: http://pastebin.com/KWN7Ebyi
/etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user: http://pastebin.com/ijSaqhuJ
So, what I should modify? Thanks
Dne 4.3.2015 v 20:39 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 04.03.2015 um
Am 04.03.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 04.03.15 14:37, RW wrote:
Why send them through SpamAssassin
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 04.03.15 14:37, RW wrote:
Why send them through SpamAssassin in the first place?
He apparently wants to filter mail
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Filip Havlíček wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Reject invalid users at the MTA level during SMTP before the message even
hits SA.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://w
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:35:55 +0100
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
> addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Why send them through SpamAssassin in the first place?
> Table bayes_token grow up to 0,5GB right now, becau
Sorry for bad reply only for you.
How can I found out right path for config file: local.cf ? Maybe config
is loaded from other path.
I used MySQL structure from this file:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/sql/bayes_mysql.sql
Thanks
Dne 4.3.2015 v 14:43 Reindl Harald napsal(a)
don't reply offlist!
Am 04.03.2015 um 14:13 schrieb Filip Havlíček:
So you recommend set parameter *bayes_auto_learn* to value *0*? I had
truncate tables and try set bayes_auto_learn 0 in
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf but it does not work - new hundrends records
of unknown email addresses occured i
Am 04.03.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Filip Havlíček:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
Table bayes_token grow up to 0,5GB right now, because there are
thounsands of unknown email addresses like:
a...@hotmail.com
ablewi.
On 11/5/2014 2:12 PM, John Woods wrote:
I did skim bug 5503 earlier, but didn't understand it at first.
Knowing the history now, it makes a little more sense, although I'm
still fuzzy on why the value of "3" for the body and head points is
important.
Can disagree. I don't know the history
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, John Woods wrote:
As for Bayes strategies (and without starting a flamewar), we just
started implementing an IMAP folder in everyone's mailbox called "Learn As
Spam", that gets processed through "sa-learn --spam". It sounds like we may
need to leave auto-learning to SA's
Kevin,
I did skim bug 5503 earlier, but didn't understand it at first.
Knowing the history now, it makes a little more sense, although I'm
still fuzzy on why the value of "3" for the body and head points is
important.
It might be nice to have local.cf directives to allow admins to be
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:06:54 -0600
John Woods wrote:
> 1) How does SpamAssassin derive and sum the "body_only" and
> "head_only" points? It doesn't look like the body_only points
> correspond to any scores from individual tests.
Scoring uses one of four score sets, chosen according to whet
On 11/4/2014 6:06 PM, John Woods wrote:
Everyone,
We're having problems with auto learning on v3.4.0 that we aren't
having on v.3.3.2. The number of spam e-mails being auto-learned has
dropped significantly, and the amount of spam being let through (false
negatives) is higher as well.
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 07:27 -0800, smfabac wrote:
> I see that there is no official answer to the question. "what is the message
> size limit where sa-learn fails."
>
If you use something spamc rather than using sa_learn you can gain some
flexibility due to the places and hosts where you can run
Smfabac wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:27:19 -0800 (PST):
> The question "So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
> a
> size limit on the messages to be processed?" is a veiled request to the SA
> developers/maintainers that people may be interested in that information.
If yo
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> Smfabac wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:20:06 -0800 (PST):
>
>> So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
>> a size limit on the message to be processed?
>
> Why not check yourself?
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http:
Smfabac wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:20:06 -0800 (PST):
> So, does the documentation on sa-learn indicate that there is
> a size limit on the message to be processed?
Why not check yourself?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
>
>> Is there a message size limit for sa-learn?
>
> Yes, there is, and sadly sa-learn does not explicitly tell you a message
> has been skipped because it's too large.
>
> If there's a non-text attachment try deleteing it and re-le
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
$ sa-learn --showdots --ham --mbox notspam
Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
Still no luck.
Are we sure the notspam file is clean? Try trimming it down to just one or
two messages, and see how it goes
- C
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
Is there a message size limit for sa-learn?
Yes, there is, and sadly sa-learn does not explicitly tell you a message
has been skipped because it's too large.
If there's a non-text attachment try deleteing it and re-learning the
message.
--
John Hardin
On 12.02.10 09:17, smfabac wrote:
> On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the form:
>
> ^A^A^A^A
> mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
> ^A^A^A^A
> Next Message mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
mmdf, not mbox.
> And my not-spam file meets this requirement:
>
> ^A^A^
Charles Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
>> Now that we're all on the same page. How do I find out why sa-learn
>> is not processing the legal not-spam file? To re-cap, "sa-learn --spam
>> --mbox isspam" works but "sa-learn --ham --mbox not-spam" is not
>> working.
>
> We
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, smfabac wrote:
Now that we're all on the same page. How do I find out why sa-learn
is not processing the legal not-spam file? To re-cap, "sa-learn --spam
--mbox isspam" works but "sa-learn --ham --mbox not-spam" is not
working.
Well, I would expect if this suggestion were
RW-15 wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:51:12 +
> RW wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:54 -0800 (PST)
>> smfabac wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Mark,
>> >
>> > On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the
>> > form:
>> >
>> > ^A^A^A^A
>> > mail headers
>> > mail b
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:51:12 +
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:54 -0800 (PST)
> smfabac wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Mark,
> >
> > On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the
> > form:
> >
> > ^A^A^A^A
> > mail headers
> > mail body
> > ^A^A^A^A
> > ^A^A^A^A
> > Nex
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:54 -0800 (PST)
smfabac wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> On UNIX any file is a mbox file if it contains mail messages in the
> form:
>
> ^A^A^A^A
> mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
> ^A^A^A^A
> Next Message mail headers
> mail body
> ^A^A^A^A
I don't know what that is, but i
Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> tonjg wrote:
>> I'm trying to run:
>> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
>> but it fails with:
>> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
>> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the above command to
>> the directory containg
tonjg wrote:
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
> but it fails with:
> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the above command to
> the directory containg mbox it always fails with the '0
tonjg wrote:
>
> raq550 server
> OS: strongbolt2
> spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.5-1.el4
>
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
> but it fails with:
> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the
If what you presented in your message is actually the command you used, then it
might be looking for some input from the keyboard - you don't illustrate having
specified the particular file you want it to use following the '--mbox' option,
you have "--ham" in that position on the line. I have n
Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> If the argument is a single mbox file, precede it with a --mbox option,
> not with --dir .
thanks for your response but I've got a further problem now (I think). I'm
trying to do the same thing with the ham command# sa-learn --showdots --mbox
--ham but nothing's happeni
it's okay - I found the solution at:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html
the command needed --mbox to be included. I added this and the learning
worked.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/bayes-learning-%270-messages-found%27-tp27358517p27358559.html
S
On Thursday 28 January 2010 17:16:04 tonjg wrote:
> spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.5-1.el4
>
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to...mbox
> but it fails with:
> 'Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 messages examined)'
> my spam mail is in a file called mbox but when I run the a
On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:24:31 -0400
Micah Anderson wrote:
If I understand things properly, because I've got these
> setup in my trusted_networks, then these previous hops will be
> checked in RBLs, so the spam is more detectable.
That doesn't really help. If you think about it, tests that run on
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 03:23:38AM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I wonder why it is called "magic".
Because the data that is being dumped is from the metadata in the DB, which we
store using "magic" tokens, since they're tokens that can't possibly exist in
the
DB through normal means.
--
Ra
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> Matt Florido wrote:
>>> I'm not seeing Bayes participating in the scoring. Is
>>> this because it's new and my Bayes db hasn't been fully
>>> trained?
>>
>> Yes. You need 200 each ham and spam.
>
> You can use sa-learn to dump the database stats and see
> how many o
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Matt Florido wrote:
> > I'm not seeing Bayes participating in the scoring. Is this because it's
> > new and my Bayes db hasn't been fully trained?
>
> Yes. You need 200 each ham and spam.
You can use sa-learn to dump the database stats and see how many of
each have been
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:08:22AM -0700, Matt Florido wrote:
> feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply
> run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed
Yes. sa-learn removes markup before doing the processing.
> I'm not seeing Bayes part
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, mouss wrote:
- you are trusting your users to make the right decision. The
problem is that different people have different opinions of what
is spam and what is not. Things get even worst if one user isn't
honest...
That's a problem with *any* schem
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, mouss wrote:
> - you are trusting your users to make the right decision. The
> problem is that different people have different opinions of what
> is spam and what is not. Things get even worst if one user isn't
> honest...
That's a problem with *any* scheme for allowing the u
Owen Mehegan wrote:
To make it easier for my users to train my server's Bayes database, I
set up a user with the following procmail recipe in its .procmailrc:
:0
* < 256000
{
:0c: spamassassin.spamlock
| sa-learn --spam
:0: spamassassin.filelock
spam
}
The idea is for peopl
At 09:52 AM 6/20/2005, Robert Swan wrote:
I am getting an error when I run manual learning sa-learn ham . Has
anyone seen this before or have a clue how to fix it
debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
As it says, you need to install DB_File. This is going to be some
Hi Robert,
You need to install the DB_File perl module. Do the
following:
perl -eshell -MCPAN
install DB_File
Cheers,
Chris
From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2005 14:53To:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Bayes learning
error
I am getting an erro
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:24:48 -0500, "Lisa Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I changed ownership of the file in /etc/cron.daily from root to defang.
No, change that back to root! You don't want the defang user to be able
to change *anything* in /etc/cron.daily! Instead, change the script to
look
Lisa Casey wrote:
> So I should just drop the -C /etc/mail/spamassassin part in the
> script?
Yep. Unless you specifically want a different configuration/ruleset for
your sa-learn call (odd but not unheard-of) you don't need to tell SA
where to find its configuration.
> In /etc/mail/spamassassin
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Deugau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: Bayes learning
> Aside from the two "make sure you're running as the correct user"
> suggestions, I'd change your script a
Lisa Casey wrote:
> I'm still fairly new to Spamassassin. I have a question regarding
> Bayes learning in Spamassassin. I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.1 on
> Redhat Linux. I have one mailbox on this server that receives nothing
> but spam and quite a lot of it. I decided that would be a good
> mailb
Lisa Casey wrote:
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lisa Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Bayes learning
Make sure the user you are running the script as is the same user that
spamassassin ru
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lisa Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Bayes learning
> Make sure the user you are running the script as is the same user that
> spamassassin runs as a
Lisa Casey wrote:
Hi All,
I'm still fairly new to Spamassassin. I have a question regarding Bayes
learning in Spamassassin. I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.1 on Redhat Linux. I
have one mailbox on this server that receives nothing but spam and quite a
lot of it. I decided that would be a good mailbox
Make sure the user you are running the script as is the same user that
spamassassin runs as and that you are logged in as that same user when
you run "spamassassin --lint --debug". You're probably training a
different database file than the one that's getting used when you run
the --lint check.
O
55 matches
Mail list logo
